WP-CopyProtect WordPress Plugin

By Jonathan Bailey • Jul 30th, 2009 • Category: Articles, Products

thechetan-logo

WordPress users have long had plugins to extend their blogging platform in countless ways. And on Plagiarism Today we’ve talked about many plugins that work to protect your content including the Digital Fingerprint plugin and Copyfeed.

However, where most plugins have worked to protect your feed, a plugin by Chetan Gole entitled WP-CopyProtect wants to help you protect your content from those that would misuse it by visiting your site directly.

But while the plugin is very simple and easy to use, by the author’s own admission, it doesn’t do a great deal to stop content misuse and, in my opinion, is most likely a step backwards for most bloggers.

How it Works

WP-CopyProtect has two basic functions. The first is disabling right click on your site and the second is preventing text selection. To do this, it uses well-established (and widely hated) JavaScripts that the plugin will place into your site’s footer at the click of the mouse.

When you first install WP-CopyProtect, and visit the settings page, you’re given a screen with the option to enable or disable both right click text selection on your site. You can also select a specific warning that users will see when they try to right click on your site.

copyprotect-1

Once activated, the scripts do seem to work well enough as they are based upon well-established techniques. Though they can be defeated any number of ways, they do function as advertised.

copyprotect-2

However, if you enable the anti-text selection feature, the plugin adds a footer to your entire site that promotes the plugin. It seems to disappear if you turn off that particular feature, but there is no warning in the plugin itself that it does this and there doesn’t seem to be an easy way to either edit this footer, disable it or even style it.

copyprotect-3

Needless to say, I found this very annoying and frustrating. Especially since it provides links back to the original site that appear to be search-engine friendly, meaning that it could be viewed by Google as a form of spamming and hurt the blog’s PageRank.

This is extremely dangerous and, in my view, poor form to do so without warning or a means to remove it.

My Take

Using DRM on your site is a bad idea, period. These scripts will do little, if anything, to protect your content and will do a great deal to frustrate those who use your site legitimately.

Many, myself included, do a lot of navigation using the right click menu and there are many legitimate reasons to want to select text on a site. For every infringer that is hindered or thwarted, dozens of legitimate users will be hurt far worse.

The footer issue is also very troublesome to me. Though I am fine with plugin authors getting credit for their work, I may consider adding a page that lists the active plugins used on this site, adding a footer link without permission or any means of removal is poor form, especially considering how harmful it could be to users.

Despite all of this, I have to give Gole high marks for his honesty about his plugins limitations. He has the following statement both on the plugin’s page in the admin panel and a similar one on his own site.

This is just a basic copy protect plug-in, if someone want to copy your content he/she can go to source of the blog and can easily copy the stuff from there. Most copy cats use your blogs RSS feeds to steal the content. Always select “Summary” at “For each article in a feed, show” in WordPress admin panel “Reading Settings” so that even if someone try to copy your content from feeds he/she can not copy the whole post.

Gole also admits that he doesn’t use the plugin on his own site because he uses a CC license, which permits copying.

But even though Gole is honest about what his plugin’s limitations are, that doesn’t encourage me to recommend it, just further remind me why most people should stay away from it.

Bottom Line

I can’t think of many reasons why someone would want to use this particular plugin. There is almost no reason to use these scripts on your site and, if you do need them, it’s pretty trivial to search for them and paste them into your own HTML. It certainly isn’t much more difficult than using this plugin and there’s no footer to worry about.

All in all, though I want to encourage plugin developers to create tools that can help content creators track and prevent misuse, I think this was a misguided effort. Still, I have to go easy on the author because it is, according to him, his first plugin and it shows both an interest in this particular area as well as some potential.

On that note, there is a lot of promise for WordPress plugins in this area and that’s something I’m going to talk about tomorrow.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Tumblr
  • Fark

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Loading ... Loading ...

Short URL to this Post: http://copybyte.com/z/2o

Jonathan Bailey is The Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today, which he founded in 2005 as a way to help Webmasters going through content theft problems get accurate information and stay up to date on the rapidly-changing field. He is also a consultant to Webmasters and companies to help them devise practical content protection strategies and develop good copyright policies.
Email this author | All posts by Jonathan Bailey

  • Interesting. I had a client asking me about this back in June and I wasn't sure if a plugin existed for it yet. Footer credit aside (don't even get me started on those...especially ones that aren't credits but insert paid text links for the plugin author!!), I pointed out that she could easily copyright her work without preventing legitimate uses of the right-click. Besides, she was worried about scraper sites, which use the feed rather than copy and paste anyway.

    I'll keep the plugin in mind for determined clients, but I think I'll point them to this article first.
  • Glad you liked the post! If you do have to use it, it is worth noting that since the plugin is GPL, you can legally just edit out the footer as long as you make it clear in the source code that you did that.

    Not an ideal solution even then, but it's something.
  • One simple thing that kind of makes copying text annoying is when the highlighted text doesn't have the solid blue background (or similar).

    Many more sites i come across are just changing the font colour slightly when text is highlighted such that i can barely tell what is highlighted. It doesn't stop a Ctrl+A move but does frustrate a little.
  • That once again seems defeatist to legitimate users though. However, I don't think that's a plugin per say, most likely just a JavaScript trick. Which seems a bit silly because you can actually use the same trick to simply block selection if you wanted.

    Strange, but interesting.
  • Thanks for this review. The idea of copy-protecting a blog was intriguing to me, but your honest look at the pros and cons have convinced me that this plugin is probably not the best solution. I really hate adding layers of scripting to my blog.
  • Agreed, I'm actually in the process now of scaling back the layers I have some...
  • While I can understand your frustration when the notice appeared in your site's footer without expecting it, I believe that it is fully within a plugin author's right to put it there. Besides, it is easy to remove from the plugin if it really bothers you.
  • While I don't disagree that plugin developers deserve credit for their work, I think that if a plugin should disclose prominently how a site is going to impact your site, especially any changes that will be made for promotional purposes.

    Given that Google is prone to reducing the PR of sites that link (without using the nofollow tag) sites that link to another domain on every page, it would seem only fair to warn before the plugin is activated that the plugin will behave in that way.

    Considering that the promotion is at their footer and many people don't look at their own site's footer for days at a time, it could ben there for a VERY long time before I a blogger catches it. Yes, it is easy to deactivate the plugin, but only if the blogger is aware of the problem.

    I agree that the plugin author has the right to put it there, but they should disclose it before activation. Most plugins either don't include it, require the blogger to turn it on or at least provide a clear means to disable it. This plugin has none of those things and does not disclose its existence beforehand.
  • I suppose I see where you're coming from, I just meant it is easy to still use that feature and remove the actual code that produces the link. The author should disclose the link, but I think it probably causes less harm to your site than many of the popular plugins' performance problems.

    BTW - Love your comment form and the nice little arrows next to the info input fields below the textarea.
  • Very true about the performance issues. Another point to ponder though, what if every plugin author did this? Those would be some ugly footers...
blog comments powered by Disqus