<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plagiarism Todaydugg | Plagiarism Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/tag/dugg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Classic Articles: The Dugg Articles</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/06/23/classic-articles-the-dugg-articles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/06/23/classic-articles-the-dugg-articles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content-Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright-Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dugg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I will be MIA this week, we will be taking a look back at some of the older articles on the site, including, today, the articles that got Dugg (and Slashdotted).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><IMG SRC="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/images/digg-icon-20080619-163736.png" alt="Digg Icon" align="left" class="picleft"><em>Note: Since I will be gone most of this week to the <a href="http://www.plagiarismconference.co.uk/" title="International Plagiarism Conference">International Plagiarism Conference</a> and unable to post new material, I&#8217;m doing a short series highlight past posts from the various sites I write for. This post is the first in that series.</em></p>
<p>Since I started Plagiarism Today, I have had two articles reach the front page of <a href="http://digg.com/" title="Digg">Digg</a>. <a href="http://digg.com/search?s=plagiarismtoday.com&#038;submit=Search&#038;section=all&#038;type=url&#038;area=all&#038;sort=score" title="Digg Search Results">Though many more have been submitted</a>, only two have made it all the way to the top, thus causing the famous &#8220;Digg Effect&#8221;.<br />
<span id="more-1280"></span><br />
The first was entitled <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=386" title="What Porn Can Teach us About Piracy">What Porn Can Teach us About Piracy</a>. The article details what the adult entertainment industry was doing to combat piracy and how the online industry was thriving despite heavy piracy of its works. </p>
<p>While the article was accurate when it was written in December of 2006, new information makes this much more out of date, especially as it relates to the bricks and mortar adult industry. </p>
<p>The second one was entitled <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/01/the-dmca-on-social-news-sites/" title="The DMCA on Social News Sites">The DMCA on Social News Sites</a>. It detailed the the DMCA takedown policy of five of the most popular social news sites and was a precursor to <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/category/articles/dmca-seven/" title="The DMCA Seven Series">the &#8220;DMCA Seven&#8221; series</a>.</p>
<p>This story was submitted before but <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/05/02/digital-rights-management-tech-cx_ag_0502digg.html" title="Digg Revolt">famous Digg Revolt</a> but ended up being caught up in the backlash. The article required nearly 1000 Diggs to reach the front page as a result of the site&#8217;s algorithm changes during the conflict and only appeared after <a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=74" title="Digg This">Digg changed its stance</a>.</p>
<p>Also, the site also appeared on Slashdot once with a less-than-favorable review of the article entitled <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/" title="The New Plagiarism">The &#8220;New&#8221; Plagiarism</a>. Most of the criticisms were due to my poor headline choice and poor writing in the article. It was one of my least favorite articles when I posted it and I deserved the beating I took for it.</p>
<p>It was also the first time the site was taken down due to a traffic spike making it an all-around learning experience for me.</p>
<p>Finally, I want to thank the users of <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" title="StumbleUpon">StumbleUpon</a> who read this site. There have been far too many articles to count that have seen huge spikes through that service. It is clear that this site has a lot of enthusiastic StumbleUpon users among its ranks and, for that, I am very grateful.</p>
<p>Thank you all for your support and help in getting the word out about this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/06/23/classic-articles-the-dugg-articles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 03:27:01 -->
