<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plagiarism TodayFeatured Articles | Plagiarism Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/category/articles/featured-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Classic Post: Analysis on The Lane Hartwell &#8220;Bubble&#8221; Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/16/classic-post-analysis-on-the-lane-hartwell-bubble-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/16/classic-post-analysis-on-the-lane-hartwell-bubble-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content-Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright-Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lane hartwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takedown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the richter scales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=4798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2007, photographer Lane Hartwell and the parody group The Richter Scales found themselves on opposite sides of a now-famous copyright dispute. But how have things changed since?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/richter-logo-300x94.jpg" alt="richter-logo" title="richter-logo" width="300" height="94" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4801" /></p>
<p><em>Note: <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/14/limited-posting-through-october/">Due to a limited posting schedule during the month of October</a> on days where I can not write regular post, I am taking time out to highlight some of the older posts that have become pillars of the site.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/18/analysis-on-the-lane-hartwell-bubble-controversy/">Original Post</a></p>
<p>In December 2007, something of a perfect copyright storm emerged. <a href="http://www.richterscales.com/">The Richter Scale</a>s, an a cappella group well-known in tech circles for its parodies of the industry, released a song entitled &#8220;Here Comes Another Bubble&#8221;, set to the tune of &#8220;We Didn&#8217;t Start the Fire&#8221; by Joel. It was an instant viral video on the Web, racking up millions of view on YouTube and other sites.</p>
<p>However, the video used photographs and other images from various sources, none of which were attributed. One of the photos, a picture Owen Thomas, was taken by famous freelance photographer <a href="http://fetching.net/">Lane Hartwell</a>, who is known to be very aggressive in enforcing her copyright.</p>
<p>She approached the band with objections about the unattributed use of her work. Though the band provided attribution in the video notes on YouTube, Hartwell wasn&#8217;t happy with the compromise and eventually filed a DMCA takedown notice against the video, which resulted in the work being removed. </p>
<p>What followed was a controversy that deeply divided the Web. Many felt Hartwell had overreacted, filing a takedown against what was in all likelihood <a href="http://lawgeek.typepad.com/lawgeek/2007/12/copyright-fair.html">a fair use of her work</a>. Others felt it was the band at fault for not providing attribution to any of the work used in the first place or, even better, seeking out appropriately-licensed material.</p>
<p>The controversy seemed to reach out to all corners of the Web and continued until the band released a new version of the video, with Hartwell&#8217;s image removed and a proper credit roll for the film.<span id="more-4798"></span></p>
<h4>Looking Back</h4>
<p>A recent comment to the post drew my attention back to it. It was a case that seemed to fall off the radar almost as fast as it came up. Even though it was a major Web storm for a period, it seemed to die off rather quickly and, at first glance, it appear that it hasn&#8217;t had any real lasting impact.</p>
<p>Part of the reason for that is that this really was a perfect storm. An extremely viral video with absolutely no attribution but heavy use of images from other sources, a photographer who is very aggressive in protecting her work and a flawed takedown system that did not allow for the item in question to be removed without deleting the entire work it was within. It doesn&#8217;t seem that we&#8217;ve had such a storm since then and it may be unlikely we will.</p>
<p>Part of the reason is that YouTube has since revamped its takedown policy, though most of the changes have focused on audio and it does seem that more YouTube users are becoming aware of the need to attribute where they get their content from, even when they intend to make a fair use of it. It seems most people are wiser about these issues, possibly in part because of this.</p>
<p>The other reason though is that this particular incident was so avoidable. Either side, could have taken steps to head off this explosion but both seemed determined to press their case as far as they could, perhaps not fully appreciating where it could lead. Granted, it made both household names in tech circles, I seriously doubt that either are grateful for the headaches and firestorm.</p>
<p>But if there is a lasting impact of this, I hope it is that it brought these issues to the forefront and both remixers and copyright holders learn from it. However, if the <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/09/16/creative-commons-debuts-study-on-noncommercial-use/">recent study by Creative Commons is any clue</a>, things may be better but there is still a long way to go, considering that 15% of remixers say that they &#8220;rarely&#8221; or &#8220;never&#8221; give attribution.</p>
<p>There is clearly still danger here. Hopefully though we can avoid another blow up like this one.</p>
<h4>The Video</h4>
<p>With credits, of course&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I6IQ_FOCE6I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I6IQ_FOCE6I&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/16/classic-post-analysis-on-the-lane-hartwell-bubble-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Featured Articles: Stopping Internet Plagiarism</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/27/featured-articles-stopping-internet-plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/27/featured-articles-stopping-internet-plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though placed on the sidebar to the right and containing some of the most important articles on the site, The &#34;Stopping Internet Plagiarism&#34; series, often times gets overlooked. As understandable as that is given the placement and titles of the works, the SIP articles are practical must-reads for anyone interested in the issue of plagiarism...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though placed on the sidebar to the right and containing some of the most important articles on the site, The &quot;Stopping Internet Plagiarism&quot; series, often times gets overlooked. </p>
<p>As understandable as that is given the placement and titles of the works, the SIP articles are practical must-reads for anyone interested in the issue of plagiarism online.</p>
<p>The articles are as follows:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=18">Stopping Internet Plagiarism</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=19"> 1. How to Find Plagiarism</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=23"> 2. Contacting a Plagiarist</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=55"> 3. Finding the Host</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=61"> 4. Contacting the Host</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=93"> 5. When All Else Fails</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=152"> 6. The Long Haul</a></p>
<p>Though at least a few of the articles are due for an update sometime soon, the overall principles and ideas remain valid and the series one of the cornerstones of this site.&nbsp; </p>
<p>[tags]Plagiarism, Content Theft, Copyright Infringement, DMCA[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/27/featured-articles-stopping-internet-plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Featured Articles: The DMCA</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/20/featured-articles-the-dmca/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/20/featured-articles-the-dmca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the topics that&#8217;s come up repeatedly since I started work on Plagiarism Today has been the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The controversial law set forth the requirements for a copyright holder to submit a complaint to a host and get any infringing materials removed. There have been several critical articles dealing with...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the topics that&#8217;s come up repeatedly since I started work on Plagiarism Today has been the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The controversial law set forth the requirements for a copyright holder to submit a complaint to a host and get any infringing materials removed.</p>
<p>There have been several critical articles dealing with the DMCA including:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=105">How to Write an Effective DMCA Notice</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=130">Study Chronicles DMCA Abuses</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=163">The Requirement of a DMCA Notice</a></p>
<p>These are just some of the articles that can be found in the <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?cat=3">DMCA category</a> of the site that offer important information on submitting DMCA notices and making sure that they are acted upon. </p>
<p>[tags]Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement, Content Theft, DMCA[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/20/featured-articles-the-dmca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Featured Article: My First Plagiarism Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/13/featured-article-my-first-plagiarism-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/13/featured-article-my-first-plagiarism-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, I&#8217;d like to again welcome all of the new readers to Plagiarism Today. I&#8217;m very glad that you are here and hope that you will participate in the conversation. I look forward to hearing what you have to say. While most entries on PT do not build on anything in the past, there...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I&#8217;d like to again welcome all of the new readers to Plagiarism Today. I&#8217;m very glad that you are here and hope that you will participate in the conversation. I look forward to hearing what you have to say.</p>
<p>While most entries on PT do not build on anything in the past, there are some entries which have become cornerstones for many current articles. So, to help ensure everyone is on the same page, I&#8217;ve decided to take advantage of Saturdays updates, where very little is happening anyway, to post featured article pieces discussing some of those older entries.</p>
<p><span id="more-241"></span>This weeks featured article is: <strong>My First Plagiarism Battle</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=65">My First Plagiarism Battle (Part One)</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=73">My First Plagiarism Battle (Part Two)</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=81">My First Plagiarism Battle (Part Three)</a><br /><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=90">My First Plagiarism Battle (Epilogue)</a></p>
<p>These articles tell the story of how I discovered that I was being plagiarized and how I handled my first case of it. It&#8217;s a textbook case in how NOT to handle plagiarism and has become a story I reference back to somewhat regularly, including on the <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=221">About the Author page</a>.</p>
<p>Long story short, if you&#8217;re interested in learning how I got involved in this fight, this is the story to read. </p>
<p>[tags]Plagiarism, Content Theft, Copyright Infringement, Copyright[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/13/featured-article-my-first-plagiarism-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 15:51:46 -->
