<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Now For Non-RSS Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/28/google-reader-now-for-non-rss-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/28/google-reader-now-for-non-rss-sites/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Whitlock</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/28/google-reader-now-for-non-rss-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-129391</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Whitlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=5450#comment-129391</guid>
		<description>a tool that will be used mostly for good.. the tool itself is amoral of course :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a tool that will be used mostly for good.. the tool itself is amoral of course <img src='http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/28/google-reader-now-for-non-rss-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-129385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=5450#comment-129385</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would say Google should work on those issues regardless of this feature. They are major problems within the search engine itself, not just Google Reader... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would say Google should work on those issues regardless of this feature. They are major problems within the search engine itself, not just Google Reader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/28/google-reader-now-for-non-rss-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-129381</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=5450#comment-129381</guid>
		<description>I think this feature could be useful.  However, before it should be implemented, Google should 1) find a more accurate method of determining the original source of an article and 2) always rank the original source above the duplicates.  I for one am tired of Google diminishing the value of my site whenever people steal my content.  I also am quite tired of having my entire site thrown on the junk heap whenever people take my content and post it all over the internet.  Google has turned into Microsoft in that it keeps creating new products without fixing the bugs in its old ones. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this feature could be useful.  However, before it should be implemented, Google should 1) find a more accurate method of determining the original source of an article and 2) always rank the original source above the duplicates.  I for one am tired of Google diminishing the value of my site whenever people steal my content.  I also am quite tired of having my entire site thrown on the junk heap whenever people take my content and post it all over the internet.  Google has turned into Microsoft in that it keeps creating new products without fixing the bugs in its old ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 21:08:29 -->
