<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shakespeare, Plagiarism Detection and Authorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Economía Digital: 360º &#187; Reflexiones sobre el concepto de copyright (III)</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/comment-page-1/#comment-138086</link>
		<dc:creator>Economía Digital: 360º &#187; Reflexiones sobre el concepto de copyright (III)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=4817#comment-138086</guid>
		<description>[...] Baste recordar las acusaciones de plagio que ya en vida persiguieron a William Shakespeare [24] (J. Bailey, 2009) o la copia de “Mona Lisa” que recientemente fue descubierta en el Museo del Prado (M. Bailey, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baste recordar las acusaciones de plagio que ya en vida persiguieron a William Shakespeare [24] (J. Bailey, 2009) o la copia de “Mona Lisa” que recientemente fue descubierta en el Museo del Prado (M. Bailey, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manheim</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/comment-page-1/#comment-132406</link>
		<dc:creator>Manheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=4817#comment-132406</guid>
		<description>I would think that this means someone was likely copying from Shakespeare to create a similar style play; how similar are his other plays? Couldn&#039;t you do a similar analysis of Shakespeare&#039;s other work to see if a similar level of overlap is found? I would think that this could turn out to be, if anything, too similar. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that this means someone was likely copying from Shakespeare to create a similar style play; how similar are his other plays? Couldn&#039;t you do a similar analysis of Shakespeare&#039;s other work to see if a similar level of overlap is found? I would think that this could turn out to be, if anything, too similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pak</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/comment-page-1/#comment-128994</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=4817#comment-128994</guid>
		<description>Great article as always!I liked the concept of &quot;even if the conclusion may be correct, the method may be flawed&quot;.  This is a very important distinction, as, depending up application, I can easily see how such software could render a false positive.   For example, if multiple authors were reporting on a single news event, or even journalists on a speech...the phrases and descriptions used could be very similar, due to the nature of the work.Thanks for making the final tie-in to school papers as well.Good read.~ Dpak </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article as always!I liked the concept of &quot;even if the conclusion may be correct, the method may be flawed&quot;.  This is a very important distinction, as, depending up application, I can easily see how such software could render a false positive.   For example, if multiple authors were reporting on a single news event, or even journalists on a speech&#8230;the phrases and descriptions used could be very similar, due to the nature of the work.Thanks for making the final tie-in to school papers as well.Good read.~ Dpak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Such Things Only Happen in Books &#124; Theater</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/10/21/shakespeare-plagiarism-detection-and-authorship/comment-page-1/#comment-128689</link>
		<dc:creator>Such Things Only Happen in Books &#124; Theater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=4817#comment-128689</guid>
		<description>[...] Shakespeare, Plagiarism Detection and Authorship (plagiarismtoday.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shakespeare, Plagiarism Detection and Authorship (plagiarismtoday.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 22:39:47 -->
