<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why To NOT Write Your Own License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Eppstein</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-136585</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eppstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-136585</guid>
		<description>@plagiarismtoday

Please note the key words &quot;have it checked by a good lawyer&quot;. Except  in the very simplistic case of a license reading &quot;This work may be  freely used by anybody provided correct attribution is given&quot;, which is a  no-brainer, a good IP lawyer is essential. However IMO the Creative  Commons licensing should be avoided so as to prevent giving support to  Lawrence Lessig&#039;s anti-copyright movement, for which it functions as an  opening wedge politically. Creative Commons also gives away rights in a  manner that makes it virtually impossible to rescind the license under  any circumstances at a later date.

 

Actually, I see very  few places where standard copyright would not be adequate, plus the  services of an attorney when negotiating licenses for publishers, record  companies, etc. And in those circumstances you should ALWAYS use a  lawyer and you pretty much always need to negotiate the license on an  individual basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@plagiarismtoday</p>
<p>Please note the key words &#8220;have it checked by a good lawyer&#8221;. Except  in the very simplistic case of a license reading &#8220;This work may be  freely used by anybody provided correct attribution is given&#8221;, which is a  no-brainer, a good IP lawyer is essential. However IMO the Creative  Commons licensing should be avoided so as to prevent giving support to  Lawrence Lessig&#8217;s anti-copyright movement, for which it functions as an  opening wedge politically. Creative Commons also gives away rights in a  manner that makes it virtually impossible to rescind the license under  any circumstances at a later date.</p>
<p>Actually, I see very  few places where standard copyright would not be adequate, plus the  services of an attorney when negotiating licenses for publishers, record  companies, etc. And in those circumstances you should ALWAYS use a  lawyer and you pretty much always need to negotiate the license on an  individual basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Eppstein</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-136584</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eppstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-136584</guid>
		<description>@plagiarismtoday Please note the key words &quot;have it checked by a good lawyer&quot;. Except in the very simplistic case of a license reading &quot;This work may be feely used by anybody provided correct attribution is given&quot;, which is a no-brainer, a good IP lawyer is essential. However IMO the Creative Commons licensing should be avoided so as to prevent giving support to Lawrence Lessig&#039;s anti-copyright movement, for which it functions as an opening wedge politically. Creative Commons also gives away rights in a manner that makes it virtually impossible to rescind the license under any circumstances at a later date.

 

Actually, I see very few places where standard copyright would not be adequate, plus the services of an attorney when negotiating licenses for publishers, record companies, etc. And in those circumstances you should ALWAYS use a lawyer and you pretty much always need to negotiate the license on an individual basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@plagiarismtoday Please note the key words &#8220;have it checked by a good lawyer&#8221;. Except in the very simplistic case of a license reading &#8220;This work may be feely used by anybody provided correct attribution is given&#8221;, which is a no-brainer, a good IP lawyer is essential. However IMO the Creative Commons licensing should be avoided so as to prevent giving support to Lawrence Lessig&#8217;s anti-copyright movement, for which it functions as an opening wedge politically. Creative Commons also gives away rights in a manner that makes it virtually impossible to rescind the license under any circumstances at a later date.</p>
<p>Actually, I see very few places where standard copyright would not be adequate, plus the services of an attorney when negotiating licenses for publishers, record companies, etc. And in those circumstances you should ALWAYS use a lawyer and you pretty much always need to negotiate the license on an individual basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plagiarismtoday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-136583</link>
		<dc:creator>plagiarismtoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-136583</guid>
		<description>@John Eppstein While it&#039;s true this was an exaggerated example, even people who are knowledgeable about the law can make mistakes. I find that the people who know a good deal about it are the ones who take the process most seriously and are the least likely to go it alone, something that I definitely still think is very smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Eppstein While it&#8217;s true this was an exaggerated example, even people who are knowledgeable about the law can make mistakes. I find that the people who know a good deal about it are the ones who take the process most seriously and are the least likely to go it alone, something that I definitely still think is very smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Eppstein</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-136572</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eppstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-136572</guid>
		<description>You title is a bit misleading, It should be &quot;Why you shouldn&#039;t write your own license if you&#039;re an idiot who doesn&#039;t know anything about the subject and you&#039;re not smart enough to have it checked by a good lawyer.

 

Most of that &quot;license&quot; isn&#039;t a license anyway and I don&#039;t see anything the writer of it was trying to do that isn&#039;t covered by standard copyright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You title is a bit misleading, It should be &#8220;Why you shouldn&#8217;t write your own license if you&#8217;re an idiot who doesn&#8217;t know anything about the subject and you&#8217;re not smart enough to have it checked by a good lawyer.</p>
<p>Most of that &#8220;license&#8221; isn&#8217;t a license anyway and I don&#8217;t see anything the writer of it was trying to do that isn&#8217;t covered by standard copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Licensing 101 for Bloggers &#124; The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-134712</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Licensing 101 for Bloggers &#124; The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-134712</guid>
		<description>[...] You can also attempt to write your own copyright license, though that path is very risky without the aid of an attorney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can also attempt to write your own copyright license, though that path is very risky without the aid of an attorney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Creative Commons a Rights Grab? &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-130126</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Creative Commons a Rights Grab? &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 02:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-130126</guid>
		<description>[...] for example. Some were even going so far as to dedicate their works to the public domain.These licenses are flat out dangerous as homebrew licenses by those without knowledge of copyright issues are, almost universally, flawed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for example. Some were even going so far as to dedicate their works to the public domain.These licenses are flat out dangerous as homebrew licenses by those without knowledge of copyright issues are, almost universally, flawed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Setting Yourself Up for Copyright Infringement &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-129831</link>
		<dc:creator>Setting Yourself Up for Copyright Infringement &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-129831</guid>
		<description>[...] Clear Licensing Terms: Trying to draft your own copyright notice usually ends in disaster. Use either all rights reserved, a Creative Commons License, a GPL license or another license that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clear Licensing Terms: Trying to draft your own copyright notice usually ends in disaster. Use either all rights reserved, a Creative Commons License, a GPL license or another license that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: POOP HEAD</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-129368</link>
		<dc:creator>POOP HEAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-129368</guid>
		<description>how the hell do I do this </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how the hell do I do this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1954</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-128853</link>
		<dc:creator>john1954</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-128853</guid>
		<description>Is there a good formula to determine how much to charge for unique content written by a market research publisher? By the word, page, etc.? What&#039;s the going rate for licensing content for use on another website? (In this case, articles about weight loss programs) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a good formula to determine how much to charge for unique content written by a market research publisher? By the word, page, etc.? What&#039;s the going rate for licensing content for use on another website? (In this case, articles about weight loss programs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Free Copyright Steps Every Blogger Should Take Today &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/05/28/why-to-not-write-your-own-license/comment-page-1/#comment-128392</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Free Copyright Steps Every Blogger Should Take Today &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3616#comment-128392</guid>
		<description>[...] If you want to allow certain uses of your work, add a Creative Commons or other appropriate license. Do not try to create your own license. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you want to allow certain uses of your work, add a Creative Commons or other appropriate license. Do not try to create your own license. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 20:44:35 -->
