Comments on: Getting Paid for Being Copied http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Adbrite & Fair Syndication Consortium Announce Cooperation | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-127015 Adbrite & Fair Syndication Consortium Announce Cooperation | PlagiarismToday Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:02:34 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-127015 [...] Consortium, previously covered here, seeks to help publishers monetize their content as it is used on other sites by tracking their [...] [...] Consortium, previously covered here, seeks to help publishers monetize their content as it is used on other sites by tracking their [...]

]]> By: Why To NOT Write Your Own License | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125628 Why To NOT Write Your Own License | PlagiarismToday Thu, 28 May 2009 19:19:45 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125628 [...] Though this seems straightforward enough, the word “Costly” links to an excellent article by Lorelle VanFossen on the Blog Herald about the Fair Syndication Consortium, which I have also written about here. [...] [...] Though this seems straightforward enough, the word “Costly” links to an excellent article by Lorelle VanFossen on the Blog Herald about the Fair Syndication Consortium, which I have also written about here. [...]

]]> By: Jonathan Baileyhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-128970 Jonathan Bailey Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:46:20 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-128970 Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.<br><br>Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions... Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.

Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions…

]]> By: Jonathan Baileyhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-127942 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:46:20 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-127942 Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.<br><br>Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions... Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.

Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions…

]]> By: Jonathan Baileyhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125381 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:46:20 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125381 Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.<br><br>Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions... Actually, it's not my chart, it's Attributor's and the FSC's, I guess I should have made that more clear lest it become an accidental plagiarism. I think the reason that they separated it out though is because they are run by two different groups with different policies.

Anyway, we'll have to see where this idea goes, right now there are so many unanswered questions…

]]> By: Voyagerfan5761http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125358 Voyagerfan5761 Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:59:36 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125358 This sounds like an interesting new approach. I might not have actually filed that DMCA you helped me with a while back if I could have instead gotten in on the AdSense revenue from that spam site. (wink, wink)<br><br>Just a note on your chart: DoubleClick is owned by Google now, so technically there should be either just a single wedge for "Google" or some sort of color coordination between (adjacent) AdSense and DoubleClick wedges. This sounds like an interesting new approach. I might not have actually filed that DMCA you helped me with a while back if I could have instead gotten in on the AdSense revenue from that spam site. (wink, wink)

Just a note on your chart: DoubleClick is owned by Google now, so technically there should be either just a single wedge for “Google” or some sort of color coordination between (adjacent) AdSense and DoubleClick wedges.

]]> By: JanisMiller (JanisMiller)http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125373 JanisMiller (JanisMiller) Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:39:43 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125373 Reading "Getting Paid for Being Copied" <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/PlagiarismToday">@PlagiarismToday</a> http://tinyurl.com/cuk76o Reading “Getting Paid for Being Copied” @PlagiarismToday http://tinyurl.com/cuk76o

]]> By: Jonathan Baileyhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125355 Jonathan Bailey Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:56:42 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125355 There are a lot of issues with this but I think the overall idea is very solid. I hope they're able to make it work... There are a lot of issues with this but I think the overall idea is very solid. I hope they're able to make it work…

]]> By: alonehttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125354 alone Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:54:00 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125354 Wow. This is awesome. Now the publishers and authors can have a good sleep without ever thinking articles will be plagiarized. But there's must be some people trying to do fraud. I hope this brilliant step will reduce plagiarism at least for the long term result. Wow. This is awesome. Now the publishers and authors can have a good sleep without ever thinking articles will be plagiarized. But there's must be some people trying to do fraud. I hope this brilliant step will reduce plagiarism at least for the long term result.

]]> By: Year of Original Content: Make Money From Copyright Thieves | BLOGCHINA.MEhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/04/22/getting-paid-for-being-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-125352 Year of Original Content: Make Money From Copyright Thieves | BLOGCHINA.ME Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:50:23 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3291#comment-125352 [...] Bailey calls it “getting paid for being copied.” He says: Content monitoring company Attributor, announced a new initiative yesterday, [...] [...] Bailey calls it “getting paid for being copied.” He says: Content monitoring company Attributor, announced a new initiative yesterday, [...]

]]>