<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Famous Plagiarists: Could it Happen Today?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Username</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137934</link>
		<dc:creator>Username</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137934</guid>
		<description>it happens today readily only the businesses or writers which do plagiarize have created methods to allow them to do so. Take Miss Oprah WInfrey as an example-go to her website www.oprah.com and act is you going to send a &quot;story&quot; or &quot;idea&quot; a &quot;suggestions&quot; even for her shows writers or staff to read as an incentive or directive for them to craft show concepts (which they get paid for) Oprah has a detailed disclaimer under her web submit form which states her business in so many words less copy, alter and use anything sent to them. They retain the privelege to not only alter information but create an excuse, remove liability, excuse themselves from having to pay for submissions and can alter material. This is the same woman whom preaches ethics and works closely in publishing.

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it happens today readily only the businesses or writers which do plagiarize have created methods to allow them to do so. Take Miss Oprah WInfrey as an example-go to her website <a href="http://www.oprah.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.oprah.com</a> and act is you going to send a &#8220;story&#8221; or &#8220;idea&#8221; a &#8220;suggestions&#8221; even for her shows writers or staff to read as an incentive or directive for them to craft show concepts (which they get paid for) Oprah has a detailed disclaimer under her web submit form which states her business in so many words less copy, alter and use anything sent to them. They retain the privelege to not only alter information but create an excuse, remove liability, excuse themselves from having to pay for submissions and can alter material. This is the same woman whom preaches ethics and works closely in publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plagiarismtoday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137932</link>
		<dc:creator>plagiarismtoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137932</guid>
		<description>First off, it was inappropriate to start a new thread in the comments. If you are unable to follow a standard protocol for conversation and keep the discussion civil, I will delete your thread.

 

However, please remember that Elliot famously quipped, &quot;=&quot;Good writers borrow, great writers steal&quot;. (Though variations of the quote circulate).

 

Here are some other sources that talk about Eliot&#039;s alleged plagiarism in varying degrees of detail:

 

The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss

 

Richard Posner, who wrote &quot;The Little Book on Plagiarism&quot; discussed it here: http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2002/04/posner.htm

 

And, perhaps most convincingly for me, Dr. John Lesko, one of the world&#039;s foremost authorities on plagiarism, wrote up TS Eliot in his site Famous Plagiarists. Unfortunately, the site is down and archive.org seems to be having trouble this second but the URL is here: http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.famousplagiarists.com/literature.htm

 

Even the article you linked to said, &quot;Perhaps the finest example of creative plagiarism is TS Eliot&#039;s long poem The Waste Land.&quot; While I agree that the intention of Eliot was one of creativity and not plagiarism, the simple fact is that, most likely, his actions would not be acceptable today.

 

I don&#039;t consider TS Eliot to be an evil stinking plagiarist, but to day that he didn&#039;t plagiarize is simply disingenuous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, it was inappropriate to start a new thread in the comments. If you are unable to follow a standard protocol for conversation and keep the discussion civil, I will delete your thread.</p>
<p>However, please remember that Elliot famously quipped, &#8220;=&#8221;Good writers borrow, great writers steal&#8221;. (Though variations of the quote circulate).</p>
<p>Here are some other sources that talk about Eliot&#8217;s alleged plagiarism in varying degrees of detail:</p>
<p>The Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss</a></p>
<p>Richard Posner, who wrote &#8220;The Little Book on Plagiarism&#8221; discussed it here: <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2002/04/posner.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2002/04/posner.htm</a></p>
<p>And, perhaps most convincingly for me, Dr. John Lesko, one of the world&#8217;s foremost authorities on plagiarism, wrote up TS Eliot in his site Famous Plagiarists. Unfortunately, the site is down and archive.org seems to be having trouble this second but the URL is here: <a href="http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.famousplagiarists.com/literature.htm" rel="nofollow">http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.famousplagiarists.com/literature.htm</a></p>
<p>Even the article you linked to said, &#8220;Perhaps the finest example of creative plagiarism is TS Eliot&#8217;s long poem The Waste Land.&#8221; While I agree that the intention of Eliot was one of creativity and not plagiarism, the simple fact is that, most likely, his actions would not be acceptable today.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t consider TS Eliot to be an evil stinking plagiarist, but to day that he didn&#8217;t plagiarize is simply disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137931</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137931</guid>
		<description>For anyone interested in a grown-up intelligent discussion on post-modernist writing, plagiarism, and collage, go to this blog.

http://readingthemaps.blogspot.com/2009/11/plagiarism-what-ihimaera-could-learn.html

 

I can&#039;t recall a single respected source who would claim that TS Eliot plagiarized. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone interested in a grown-up intelligent discussion on post-modernist writing, plagiarism, and collage, go to this blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://readingthemaps.blogspot.com/2009/11/plagiarism-what-ihimaera-could-learn.html" rel="nofollow">http://readingthemaps.blogspot.com/2009/11/plagiarism-what-ihimaera-could-learn.html</a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recall a single respected source who would claim that TS Eliot plagiarized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plagiarismtoday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137930</link>
		<dc:creator>plagiarismtoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137930</guid>
		<description>Please, take a moment to actually read the article, you&#039;ll see that this is a response to an article on Cracked.com. The source link is in this article and that article, in turn, has links to the proof. 

 

If you have any further questions, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, take a moment to actually read the article, you&#8217;ll see that this is a response to an article on Cracked.com. The source link is in this article and that article, in turn, has links to the proof. </p>
<p>If you have any further questions, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137929</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137929</guid>
		<description>Typical type of article by a blogger. A lot of accusations which you just throw out as &quot;true&quot; but don&#039;t bother to actually build a factual case for. I am sure you will say that it is up to the reader to &quot;look it up&quot; but that is a lazy, trivial approach to scholarship. If you do not have the time to write a thesis backed up with clear examples as to exactly why &quot;The Wasteland&quot; is a plagiarized poem, then don&#039;t write anything at all...oh yeah, nothing at all is what this article amounts to. besides, there isn;t half as much plagiearism as &quot;webmaster&quot; claim.  More often than not, there contributions are to trite to deserve protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical type of article by a blogger. A lot of accusations which you just throw out as &#8220;true&#8221; but don&#8217;t bother to actually build a factual case for. I am sure you will say that it is up to the reader to &#8220;look it up&#8221; but that is a lazy, trivial approach to scholarship. If you do not have the time to write a thesis backed up with clear examples as to exactly why &#8220;The Wasteland&#8221; is a plagiarized poem, then don&#8217;t write anything at all&#8230;oh yeah, nothing at all is what this article amounts to. besides, there isn;t half as much plagiearism as &#8220;webmaster&#8221; claim.  More often than not, there contributions are to trite to deserve protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plagiarism = Purloining: Discernment of the Original &#124; centerforics.org</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-137601</link>
		<dc:creator>Plagiarism = Purloining: Discernment of the Original &#124; centerforics.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-137601</guid>
		<description>[...] verbal exchange of ideas started. Shakespeare was accused of plagiarism, and there are other famous cases of reported plagiarism. There is plagiarism in music as well. Plagiarism has been a pervasive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verbal exchange of ideas started. Shakespeare was accused of plagiarism, and there are other famous cases of reported plagiarism. There is plagiarism in music as well. Plagiarism has been a pervasive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catching Dead Plagiarists: Is it Worth It? &#124; Plagiarism Today</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-136464</link>
		<dc:creator>Catching Dead Plagiarists: Is it Worth It? &#124; Plagiarism Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-136464</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t more research done on the issue of plagiarism but, in this case, the issue may be moot. As we discussed previously, we are already aware of a lot of plagiarist authors from the past, including many famous ones. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t more research done on the issue of plagiarism but, in this case, the issue may be moot. As we discussed previously, we are already aware of a lot of plagiarist authors from the past, including many famous ones. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Username</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-136146</link>
		<dc:creator>Username</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-136146</guid>
		<description>Beware of Oprah Winfrey, she is a shifty individual and her website disclaimer @ www.oprah.com under the submit/contact form for years stated she and her staff can alter any words submitted, change stories and times without being &quot;obliged&quot; to pay the general public or submitter. Her other notes regarding intellectual property apply less as the only method to send information is through that web portal. Notice her list of celebrity clients constantly need new and exciting idea&#039;s to keep their profit making careers going. The cover of charity and &quot;doing good&quot; along with health advise has benefitted her and them into billionaires. No reputable publisher takes credit or removes liability. Its no longer plagiarism when people gain revenue from your work, plans or idea&#039;s, its then a profit making scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of Oprah Winfrey, she is a shifty individual and her website disclaimer @ <a href="http://www.oprah.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.oprah.com</a> under the submit/contact form for years stated she and her staff can alter any words submitted, change stories and times without being &#8220;obliged&#8221; to pay the general public or submitter. Her other notes regarding intellectual property apply less as the only method to send information is through that web portal. Notice her list of celebrity clients constantly need new and exciting idea&#8217;s to keep their profit making careers going. The cover of charity and &#8220;doing good&#8221; along with health advise has benefitted her and them into billionaires. No reputable publisher takes credit or removes liability. Its no longer plagiarism when people gain revenue from your work, plans or idea&#8217;s, its then a profit making scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-125165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-125165</guid>
		<description>Strangely, a similar thought ran across my mind as well, but it wasn&#039;t the Weather Channel, I was thinking of traditional cable news. Sad day and age isn&#039;t it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely, a similar thought ran across my mind as well, but it wasn&#039;t the Weather Channel, I was thinking of traditional cable news. Sad day and age isn&#039;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/31/famous-plagiarists-could-it-happen-today/comment-page-1/#comment-125164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3131#comment-125164</guid>
		<description>It is surprising but if you visit the Famous Plagiarists site you&#039;ll see that a lot of great writers were implicated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is surprising but if you visit the Famous Plagiarists site you&#039;ll see that a lot of great writers were implicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 19:58:09 -->
