<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracer: 3 Weeks Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-125143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3114#comment-125143</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback on the backlink issue. I&#039;m not sure what the difference would be there though. Granted, a lot of my copying comes from people wanting to use stock letters and it makes sense they&#039;d remove the backlinks there, but I&#039;m unsure how different content types would affect this.Clearly this is something I&#039;m going to have to look at closer... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback on the backlink issue. I&#039;m not sure what the difference would be there though. Granted, a lot of my copying comes from people wanting to use stock letters and it makes sense they&#039;d remove the backlinks there, but I&#039;m unsure how different content types would affect this.Clearly this is something I&#039;m going to have to look at closer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-125142</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3114#comment-125142</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jonathan for the feedback.  This is exactly the kind of information we are looking for in the Tynt Tracer Beta so that we can refine the product before final release.  We are seeing some of our beta sites seeing quite a bit of link back traffic, and others much less.  It seems to depend on the kind of information being presented on the site, and the type of visitor the site attracts.Please keep the feedback coming!Derek </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jonathan for the feedback.  This is exactly the kind of information we are looking for in the Tynt Tracer Beta so that we can refine the product before final release.  We are seeing some of our beta sites seeing quite a bit of link back traffic, and others much less.  It seems to depend on the kind of information being presented on the site, and the type of visitor the site attracts.Please keep the feedback coming!Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-125132</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3114#comment-125132</guid>
		<description>While I agree that it does help separate those who are well-intended from those that are true plagiarists, I have to say that I am a bit squeamish about messing with people&#039;s copy and paste function. Any time you do something that causes someone&#039;s computer to have an unpredictable behavior, people get upset.In that regard, it&#039;s a trade off, but based on my stats I&#039;m not seeing it making a lot of difference... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that it does help separate those who are well-intended from those that are true plagiarists, I have to say that I am a bit squeamish about messing with people&#039;s copy and paste function. Any time you do something that causes someone&#039;s computer to have an unpredictable behavior, people get upset.In that regard, it&#039;s a trade off, but based on my stats I&#039;m not seeing it making a lot of difference&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/tracer-3-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-125128</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3114#comment-125128</guid>
		<description>I like the attribution feature.  When people do copy text from your site, it serves as a nice reminder that they should attribute the text and include a link back to the original article.  It also helps to separate the innocent people who are highlight quality content from the malicious thieves who just want to claim content as their own. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the attribution feature.  When people do copy text from your site, it serves as a nice reminder that they should attribute the text and include a link back to the original article.  It also helps to separate the innocent people who are highlight quality content from the malicious thieves who just want to claim content as their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 15:10:06 -->
