<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Count: Permanent Twilight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/3-count-permanent-twilight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/3-count-permanent-twilight/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/3-count-permanent-twilight/comment-page-1/#comment-125131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3112#comment-125131</guid>
		<description>I certainly don&#039;t condone hacking and hope that this person is brought to justice, however, it seems unlikely at this point.That being said though it really does hamper the reputation of a security firm when their own servers are breached and they then are unable to prevent it from being easily downloaded on bittorrent, despite that being their primary function.In the end, it was probably the reputation damage and other factors that really sank the company. They had been attacked in and out of court and were endangering active cases. It seems like the hacker was just the most public blow. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly don&#039;t condone hacking and hope that this person is brought to justice, however, it seems unlikely at this point.That being said though it really does hamper the reputation of a security firm when their own servers are breached and they then are unable to prevent it from being easily downloaded on bittorrent, despite that being their primary function.In the end, it was probably the reputation damage and other factors that really sank the company. They had been attacked in and out of court and were endangering active cases. It seems like the hacker was just the most public blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/03/27/3-count-permanent-twilight/comment-page-1/#comment-125130</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=3112#comment-125130</guid>
		<description>Forget for a minute that MediaDefender was working on such a complicated issue that rankles many.  It is disturbing that a hacker can break into a company&#039;s systems, cost it $1 million, put it out of business, and get away scot-free. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget for a minute that MediaDefender was working on such a complicated issue that rankles many.  It is disturbing that a hacker can break into a company&#039;s systems, cost it $1 million, put it out of business, and get away scot-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 16:22:22 -->
