<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Facebook TOS Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quora</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-137057</link>
		<dc:creator>Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-137057</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How can a contemporary artist utilize the notion of &#039;open source&#039; without losing authorship?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Open source is usually not unconditionally open. For example, Creative Commons has a 2x3 matrix of degrees of open-ness (http://creativecommons.org/choose). While all creative commons licenses require that the author is given proper attribution, those ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How can a contemporary artist utilize the notion of &#8216;open source&#8217; without losing authorship?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Open source is usually not unconditionally open. For example, Creative Commons has a 2&#215;3 matrix of degrees of open-ness (<a href="http://creativecommons.org/choose" rel="nofollow">http://creativecommons.org/choose</a>). While all creative commons licenses require that the author is given proper attribution, those &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An about-Face &#124; Tommy Donovan.com</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-132491</link>
		<dc:creator>An about-Face &#124; Tommy Donovan.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-132491</guid>
		<description>[...] So most of us woke up this morning to the &#8220;news&#8221; that Facebook reversed their recent controversial policy about owning your content on there, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So most of us woke up this morning to the &#8220;news&#8221; that Facebook reversed their recent controversial policy about owning your content on there, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Eclectic Mind &#187; Interesting Links, February 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-132464</link>
		<dc:creator>An Eclectic Mind &#187; Interesting Links, February 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-132464</guid>
		<description>[...] The Facebook TOS Controversy &#8211; Yet ANOTHER take on the Facebook TOS controversy. On PlagiarismToday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Facebook TOS Controversy &#8211; Yet ANOTHER take on the Facebook TOS controversy. On PlagiarismToday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFF Announces TOS Tracker &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-125702</link>
		<dc:creator>EFF Announces TOS Tracker &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-125702</guid>
		<description>[...] the Facebook TOS controversy in February revealed, changes to the TOS can be dangerous to user privacy, security and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Facebook TOS controversy in February revealed, changes to the TOS can be dangerous to user privacy, security and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sanger</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-128017</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-128017</guid>
		<description>Jonathan - Another TOS controversy is brewing with Seesmic , the popular video sharing site.Here&#039;s part of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://seesmic.com/docs/TOS.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TOS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;quote&gt;While you own all of your own User-Generated Content, you hereby grant us, our licensees of the Applications and business partners a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, perpetual and irrevocable right and license to use and exploit your User-Generated Content &lt;b&gt;for any purpose&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/quote&gt;it gets worse, extending to &quot; videos, photographs, images or likenesses of you, or in which you may be included with others.&quot;Perhaps this is best in a separate thread. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan &#8211; Another TOS controversy is brewing with Seesmic , the popular video sharing site.Here&#039;s part of their <a href="http://seesmic.com/docs/TOS.html" rel="nofollow">TOS</a>&lt;quote&gt;While you own all of your own User-Generated Content, you hereby grant us, our licensees of the Applications and business partners a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, perpetual and irrevocable right and license to use and exploit your User-Generated Content <b>for any purpose</b>.&lt;/quote&gt;it gets worse, extending to &quot; videos, photographs, images or likenesses of you, or in which you may be included with others.&quot;Perhaps this is best in a separate thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidsanger</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-125485</link>
		<dc:creator>davidsanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-125485</guid>
		<description>Jonathan - Another TOS controversy is brewing with Seesmic , the popular video sharing site.Here&#039;s part of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://seesmic.com/docs/TOS.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TOS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;quote&gt;While you own all of your own User-Generated Content, you hereby grant us, our licensees of the Applications and business partners a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, perpetual and irrevocable right and license to use and exploit your User-Generated Content &lt;b&gt;for any purpose&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/quote&gt;it gets worse, extending to &quot; videos, photographs, images or likenesses of you, or in which you may be included with others.&quot;Perhaps this is best in a separate thread. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan &#8211; Another TOS controversy is brewing with Seesmic , the popular video sharing site.Here&#039;s part of their <a href="http://seesmic.com/docs/TOS.html" rel="nofollow">TOS</a>&lt;quote&gt;While you own all of your own User-Generated Content, you hereby grant us, our licensees of the Applications and business partners a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, perpetual and irrevocable right and license to use and exploit your User-Generated Content <b>for any purpose</b>.&lt;/quote&gt;it gets worse, extending to &quot; videos, photographs, images or likenesses of you, or in which you may be included with others.&quot;Perhaps this is best in a separate thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The price to pay &#171; tonestandard</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-125145</link>
		<dc:creator>The price to pay &#171; tonestandard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-125145</guid>
		<description>[...] your readers coming from? The online diary was an avatar, a digital representative of a person, and much like Facebook discovered, the personal and mercantile make a controversial mix. Even the terminology gave it away: these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your readers coming from? The online diary was an avatar, a digital representative of a person, and much like Facebook discovered, the personal and mercantile make a controversial mix. Even the terminology gave it away: these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-124906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-124906</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Looking into this as a column for next week! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Looking into this as a column for next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook gets democracy &#8212; Jen Reeves - New Media Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-124890</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook gets democracy &#8212; Jen Reeves - New Media Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-124890</guid>
		<description>[...] a huge revolt against Facebook&#8217;s Terms of Service the company announced it plans to go about things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a huge revolt against Facebook&#8217;s Terms of Service the company announced it plans to go about things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyagerfan5761</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/17/the-facebook-tos-controversy/comment-page-2/#comment-124881</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyagerfan5761</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2857#comment-124881</guid>
		<description>Responding to your call for TOS Showdown contenders, I immediately thought of photo-sharing sites. Flickr, Picasa Web Albums, Webshots, Photobucket, Zooomr, and even Facebook/MySpace (since they have photo apps) would be good for comparison, I think.Sorry it took so long; I read this post in Google Reader Mobile and Disqus doesn&#039;t work in Pocket IE (WM2003SE). Then I was out of town until late last night. So this is the first opportunity I&#039;ve had to comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to your call for TOS Showdown contenders, I immediately thought of photo-sharing sites. Flickr, Picasa Web Albums, Webshots, Photobucket, Zooomr, and even Facebook/MySpace (since they have photo apps) would be good for comparison, I think.Sorry it took so long; I read this post in Google Reader Mobile and Disqus doesn&#039;t work in Pocket IE (WM2003SE). Then I was out of town until late last night. So this is the first opportunity I&#039;ve had to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 17:15:43 -->
