<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The AP/Shepherd Fairey Dispute</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: The Lawyer: Venkat on Copyright and More 1/2 :: Rasmus Rasmussen dot com</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-125592</link> <dc:creator>The Lawyer: Venkat on Copyright and More 1/2 :: Rasmus Rasmussen dot com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-125592</guid> <description>[...] into trouble.” This is just plain wrong, as illustrated by the recent dispute involving the AP/Fairey. Fair use is a very contextual determination, and if the stakes are high enough, will almost always [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into trouble.” This is just plain wrong, as illustrated by the recent dispute involving the AP/Fairey. Fair use is a very contextual determination, and if the stakes are high enough, will almost always [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-129011</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:53:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-129011</guid> <description>Can you provide a source for that? I&#039;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide a source for that? I&#39;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boris Roussimoff</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-129010</link> <dc:creator>Boris Roussimoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-129010</guid> <description>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#039;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#039;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#39;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#39;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-127974</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-127974</guid> <description>Can you provide a source for that? I&#039;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide a source for that? I&#39;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boris Roussimoff</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-127973</link> <dc:creator>Boris Roussimoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-127973</guid> <description>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#039;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#039;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#39;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#39;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-124739</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-124739</guid> <description>Can you provide a source for that? I&#039;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide a source for that? I&#39;d like to reference it if it can be verified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boris Roussimoff</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-124736</link> <dc:creator>Boris Roussimoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-124736</guid> <description>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#039;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#039;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairy has admitted to selling 4000 posters at $45 each, giving him a revenue of $180,000. His repeated claim of having made no money is based on his assertion that he put the money back into printing posters for free to be used for political purposes. That&#39;s not the same as earning no revenue. That&#39;s earning $180,000 and then spending it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MattJhsn (Matt Johnson)</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-124692</link> <dc:creator>MattJhsn (Matt Johnson)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-124692</guid> <description>AP sues the creator of the &quot;HOPE&quot; poster for infringement.   http://bit.ly/1CpyZk ,  a few more copies  http://bit.ly/18ihK7</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AP sues the creator of the &#8220;HOPE&#8221; poster for infringement. <a
href="http://bit.ly/1CpyZk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1CpyZk</a> ,  a few more copies <a
href="http://bit.ly/18ihK7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/18ihK7</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: February 12 roundup</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-124691</link> <dc:creator>February 12 roundup</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:42:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-124691</guid> <description>[...] Some thoughts on much-publicized tussle between Associated Press and Shepard Fairey over Obamacon photo [Plagiarism Today] [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some thoughts on much-publicized tussle between Associated Press and Shepard Fairey over Obamacon photo [Plagiarism Today] [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gib</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/06/the-apshepherd-fairey-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-124664</link> <dc:creator>Gib</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2741#comment-124664</guid> <description>Even though the image is transformative there still has to be obvious connection between the the old image and the new image in the mind of the viewer. The fact that neither the AP nor the photographer made the connection shows just how poor Fairey&#039;s fair use claim is. Transformative in copyright law does not mean that the image is pushed beyond recognition when compared to the original image. This has been shown in court more than the opposite. So I think Fairey will have a hard fair use case to make.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fairey may have donated the money to the campaign, but he still made profit from the image in order to obtain that donation money.  Last I checked the ObeyGiant site is not a non-profit nor Fairey&#039;s studio. Fairey is free to do what he wants with his money after earning it, but the fact is he made profit. The fact that he made it clear that money would go toward the campaign does not matter because he is not running a non-profit.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Reuters photograph was thought to be the photograph Fairey used before the Mannie Garcia info was made public. A gallery representing Fairey admitted to Garcia and the press that the origin of the poster is Garcia&#039;s photograph. Shepard Fairey has also finally said that it was indeed Garcia&#039;s photograph. I&#039;m sure the AP knows what they own or not. Their legal team is expansive.The AP supports copyright protection so my guess is that they are doing this to make a stand. You have to remember that copyright is designed to protect creators of original works. It is not a catch all protection for everyone else to use those works. Fair use is limited for a reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Garcia is known for being a creative photographer so that will work for the AP. Fairey should have used an image that was more widely known or he should have contacted the photographer and AP in the first place. Fairey is a professional illustrator working for major companies. He should know the rules when it comes to using images by others in his work. Working against him is the fact that he settled with the estate of Rene Mederos in 2007 for copyright infringement. That could come up. His ethics are also in question because he sent a cease and desist letter to an artist named Baxter Orr after or made a parody of Obey Giant which was a perfect example of fair use under both copyright and trademark law. Obey Giant is known the world over so it is a good choice to use for fair use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the image is transformative there still has to be obvious connection between the the old image and the new image in the mind of the viewer. The fact that neither the AP nor the photographer made the connection shows just how poor Fairey&#39;s fair use claim is. Transformative in copyright law does not mean that the image is pushed beyond recognition when compared to the original image. This has been shown in court more than the opposite. So I think Fairey will have a hard fair use case to make.</p><p>Fairey may have donated the money to the campaign, but he still made profit from the image in order to obtain that donation money.  Last I checked the ObeyGiant site is not a non-profit nor Fairey&#39;s studio. Fairey is free to do what he wants with his money after earning it, but the fact is he made profit. The fact that he made it clear that money would go toward the campaign does not matter because he is not running a non-profit.</p><p>The Reuters photograph was thought to be the photograph Fairey used before the Mannie Garcia info was made public. A gallery representing Fairey admitted to Garcia and the press that the origin of the poster is Garcia&#39;s photograph. Shepard Fairey has also finally said that it was indeed Garcia&#39;s photograph. I&#39;m sure the AP knows what they own or not. Their legal team is expansive.The AP supports copyright protection so my guess is that they are doing this to make a stand. You have to remember that copyright is designed to protect creators of original works. It is not a catch all protection for everyone else to use those works. Fair use is limited for a reason.</p><p>Garcia is known for being a creative photographer so that will work for the AP. Fairey should have used an image that was more widely known or he should have contacted the photographer and AP in the first place. Fairey is a professional illustrator working for major companies. He should know the rules when it comes to using images by others in his work. Working against him is the fact that he settled with the estate of Rene Mederos in 2007 for copyright infringement. That could come up. His ethics are also in question because he sent a cease and desist letter to an artist named Baxter Orr after or made a parody of Obey Giant which was a perfect example of fair use under both copyright and trademark law. Obey Giant is known the world over so it is a good choice to use for fair use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-21 19:27:44 -->