Stupid Plagiarist Tricks

By Jonathan Bailey • Jan 7th, 2009 • Category: Articles
facepalm120907.jpg
Creative Commons License photo credit: joelogon

Plagiarists are not typically known for being the brightest nor the hardest-working people on the planet. If they were, they wouldn’t be plagiarizing. But for every reasonably intelligent person that makes a mistake and gets caught up in a plagiarism tiff, there are dozens, if not hundreds of morons blundering their way through copy and paste 101.

But while I don’t assume I’m dealing with Mensa candidates when I’m handling plagiarism cases, there have been a few that really raised the bar on stupidity.

So here are three of my “favorite” plagiarism cases from the 700 plus I’ve handled involving my own work. I’m obviously not going to mention any sites or names, but all of the stories are accurate retellings (memory and evidence allowing) of actual idiot plagiarists.

The 10-Year-Old Poet

The second case of plagiarism I dealt with introduced me to just how asinine some plagiarists could be and almost put me off to dealing with plagiarists directly at all.

I had noticed that some of my poems were on a journal hosted a LiveJournal-like site. I attempted to contact the admins since the individual had no email address on his journal but apparently something went amiss. After waiting a few days, I left a comment on one of the posts and then watched as all Hell broke loose.

He claimed not just to have written the items be posted, but every single one of the works on my site, over 100 of them. I then confronted him with the fact that my site, at that time, had been up for well over six years, something easily proved in the Web Archive, including many of the poems he had copied. He didn’t deny the time frame and continue to claim he had written the works, even though his profile said he was about to turn seventeen. This meant that he would have been only ten years old at the time the first poems went up.

The logic train pulled further away from the station as he later began to make claims of somehow telepathically delivering the works to me and began to pen vulgar fantasies about how he would beat me in court by being too “sexy” to prosecute.

After a brief mention on my site, it quickly erupted into a flame war with my readers inundating his comments. However, even that was for naught. Even after being called out and facing overwhelming evidence, he actually increased his posting pace, adding two or three of my poems every day.

Eventually the admins did step in, after I sent a second email, and the journal was suspended. The case was resolved but I’ve never been able to forget that someone actually claimed to be a 10-year-old poet with magical telepathic powers to get out of a plagiarism accusation.

Mitigating Circumstances: If I were to defend this individual I would plead insanity. I often wonder if this person had mental problems far beyond his love for copying mediocre poetry.

A Friend’s Betrayal

In 2004/2005 I had an online friend that was helping me settle into New Orleans a bit. She was right across the border in Mississippi and new the city’s literary scene pretty well. Having just moved into town a bit over a year prior, I was still getting my feet wet some and needed the help.

She knew well my battles with plagiarists, by that point I had written about them many times before on my site, and I even demonstrated the power of my detection tools to her, showing her plagiarist links that had only gone up the day before.

So I was incredibly surprised when one of the Google Alerts I received pointed me to a site run by a woman who was eerily familiar. She was from the same town as my friend, roughly the same age and had a very similar screen name. Despite that, I didn’t put the pieces together right away, but when I clicked a link to her Myspace profile, it all fit.

To make matters worse, this woman had included all of her personal information in an informal resume, including real name, address and phone number (all of which I had previously) and had even linked to my site from her Myspace page. Yet, on this personal Web page, there were 12 of my works, all under her name.

I tried to call but got no answer. I then sent a hostile email about the matter and consulted with my attorney about what to do. He advised me to sue and I hurriedly registered my work with the Copyright Office in preparation. Eventually, I heard back from her,after several weeks of waiting, and she flatly denied being the one who posted the works.

The only problem, other than the mountain of personal information that I could easily verify, was that the week before she had emailed me asking if I had removed three works. I hadn’t, they had just changed categories, and I directed her to the correct place. Those three works were the most recently plagiarized.

In the end, Hurricane Katrina put an end to the lawsuit preparations. When it hit and both of our cities were severely damaged, everyone involved felt there were more pressing issues. Furthermore, it was unlikely she remained in the same location, making it very difficult to file the suit.

The site, however, was quickly shut down.

Still, I find it stunning not only that someone who I considered a friend could betray me knowing full and well what I could do in this area, but that her best defense was “Not me” despite her literally telling everyone it was.

Mitigating Circumstances: Looking back on this individual, I see that almost everything about her was a lie. Though she had good information, everything about her was either a lie or an exaggeration. I usually pride myself on being a good judge of character, but this time I got fooled. I have come to believe this person was a compulsive liar, just not a very smart one. I, as with the first one, wonder if this is due to some kind of serious mental issue.

No Plagiarism: That’s the Policy

I am often alerted to plagiarism issues not by Google Alerts, but via concerned readers and fans. One such case involved a stranger who asked me to confirm if I had written everything on my site. When I replied in the affirmative, he informed me that he had seen almost a dozen works on a forum he visits.

When I checked it out, I was surprised to find that this was no ordinary forum plagiarist. It was the administrator of the community, which in turn was part of a larger community/social networking site.

To make matters worse, I was literally stepping into the matter mid-fray. The plagiarist was already being bombarded with hostile questions and a forum topic about the posts had already received many dozens of replies. Even the plagiarists girlfriend, who was apparently a part of the forum, was part of the discussion (especially interesting since had claimed to write one for her).

To make matters worse for him, he had apparently made all of his posts “sticky” putting them at the top of the forum. That made it very easy for me to locate. However, as I began to look up information on how to contact the higher ups at the site, the admin-turned-plagiarist started lashing back, locking the thread in question and removing the sticky from the posts. This, in turn, buried them under dozens of pages of other people’s writing.

Fortunately, that was nothing that a “site:” search in Google couldn’t resolve (still no idea why I did not get a Google Alert for these items) and I was able to get the site admins to remove all of the posts. As I left the plagiarist to patch up things with his community and his girlfriend, I noticed he had posted a terms of service for people posting his site, I took a quick peek and found that the second item began with the words “NO PLAGIARISM” (caps his).

I was tempted to enter the fray on this one, but thought better of it. Leaving this one behind.

Mitigating Circumstances: I’ve got nothing. Hypocrite and jerk are not mitigating circumstances.

Your Turn

Have you had any dealing with stupid plagiarists? If so I’d love to hear your thoughts, leave a comment below and share your stories.

I look forward to hearing your stories!

Note: The guy in the image is not a plagiarist, just someone I imagine expressing a natural reaction when confronted with high levels of human stupidity.



Jonathan Bailey is The Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today, which he founded in 2005 as a way to help Webmasters going through content theft problems get accurate information and stay up to date on the rapidly-changing field. He is also a consultant to Webmasters and companies to help them devise practical content protection strategies and develop good copyright policies.
Email this author | All posts by Jonathan Bailey

  • Jim
    Great post Jonathan. My example is more like capitalizing on someone's enthusiasm. In college I wrote a great tagline for a fictional Mexican restaurant chain. It was so good, that I actually contacted one (in Dallas) with a nice introductory letter and a mild appeal to do some freelance copywriting work for them. This was a few years before email was the routine way to communicate (though websites were coming into their own), so the correspondence was via USPS mail. Anyway, a few weeks after sending my note, I received a response letter from the company thanking me for my letter, and explaining how they were already contracted with an agency of record and could not outsource any work to me. A few weeks after that, I decided to check out their site to see if I could figure out who their agency was. That's when I saw my tagline as their main splash page headline. I considered litigation, but was flat broke at the time and their letter was written in such a way that it didn't mention my contribution at all. Live and learn.
  • I've dealt with plagiarists before, however, working for a very large and well-known company, I am usually able to deter them with the threat of those lawyers as much of my work is cross-posted on my personal blog. It's nice to have that back-up!
  • Wow! Great stories Jonathan!

    Reminds me of the time when a lady contacted the leaders of one of the About.com sites to say they had wrongly attributed an article to me, since she said it was written by her. When she was informed that, no, the article was in fact mine, she proceeded to tell them that I had copied her article and took credit for it.

    Little did she know that the site admin was a friend of mine who requested to use the article from me years before she said she wrote it, but I also, like you, had the proof of it being online at that time.

    I contacted her to explain that it's weird for the theif to accuse the victim of stealing, and she stuck to her story until I showed her the proof. It was then I figured out she had hired a ghost-writer off elance to write articles for her, and they simply yanked mine. No apology from her though, no admitting fault, she said it was a mis-communication...

    oye!
  • I've dealt with plagiarists but only in a situation where I was a moderator on a fiction site and had to step in on behalf of a third party.
    I think your blog is a very useful resource, as I often come across other writers with questions related to this worrisome issue. Will bookmark it to share the next time someone asks me.
    I'm sure at some point I'll be needing to refer to it as well, since some of my works are publicly posted on my site.
    Keep up the good work!
  • That second case is awful. :(

    The third with the girlfriend and him having wrote the poem for her... lol. That's good. :)

    Nice post.

    Patrick
  • Oh, that's a good one. I suppose that belongs in the "Well, he'll never visit our Website" file. Probably really wasn't worth suing over but it is a real "facepalm" moment. I have to wonder if they seriously thought they would never get caught...
  • Plagiarists do have a nice tendency to fold under any kind of serious legal scrutiny. There are definitely advantages to being part of a large company with on-staff attorneys. Sounds like a good place to be to me!
  • The ghostwriter thing is always ugly. I've seen that on many occasions. If you go to an elance site, you get what you pay for usually I'm afraid. Still, the least she could have done is apologized for it and explained what had happened.

    Of course, I've always found this idea of ghostwriting kind of strange in and of itself. I write something for someone and they get to take credit for it. Then, when someone copies it they can storm up to that person and call them a plagiarist.

    I'm not wholly opposed to ghostwriting, but something sounds a little funny here...
  • Keep up the good work helping others with their cases and, if there is anything I can do to help you or anyone who approaches you, let me know!
  • I got over the second case a long time ago. It's over and the person got most of what they deserved. I'm at piece with it. The third though, is hilarious. I've got dozens more though, maybe a follow up post later.
  • As you know, plagiarism is an ongoing concern for me. I find that tracking down and fighting back against plagiarists is extremely time consuming and non-productive. But I feel a real NEED to fight back. I think there would be a lot of work for someone who does this professionally and had a legal team behind him/her to rattle the big swords. Sadly, unless such a person was affordable, people like me probably wouldn't be able to hire them. Sometimes, it just isn't worth the effort, no matter what your gut instinct tells you.

    Thanks again for all you do here. Keep up the good fight.
  • Back in the early days of individuals posting my blog stuff on their own sites, they usually hotlinked the images.

    So I'd swap out the images. Sometimes a roiling ball of maggots on an open wound with text that says "Only Maggots Steal" or a picture of The Golden Girls DVD Set with the text that said "When You Hotlink You're No Longer In Control." (But I stopped doing the latter because I realized I didn't have rights to the image but the maggots were public domain from the US gov.)

    Now I block hotlinking so it's not so easy to do that.

    I argue sometimes with photo stealers who insist that they took the pictures, but pointing them to my Flickr page for the photo with the full EXIF data usually shuts them up.
  • I've been using Numly for some proof of authoring. Costs me $60.00 a year, I think it's worth it.

    One moron actually copied my post WITH THE NUMLY BARCODE. Duh - that was pretty dumb..
  • I don't know if it falls into the category of stupid plagiarist or brilliant plagiarist as the author eventually used her plagiarized works in order to get a book deal... http://www.fanhistory.com/wiki/Cassandra_Claire... has most of the details. There were all sorts of excuses for the plagiarism when it was discovered, including that she was playing a game of spot the quote with her readers, that she had always footnoted the references (which she had never done that completely), that she had permission from the author (which she got before or after the plagiarism actually happened and depended on the telling) and that because it wasn't fan fiction, the plagiarism didn't count. The author in question was a journalist which explains that last defense. She was also supported by Internet (real life too) lawyer who specialized in entertainment law who said it wasn't plagiarism and threatened to sue people who implied that. (So it wasn't a surprise later when her lawyer was revealed to be a plagiarist. She defended herself as having done a pastiche.) The author then cribbed passages from her fan fiction verbatim into her professional works. So yeah, not sure if it is a case of stupid or brilliant because she helped use this all to help get herself that book deal.
  • That is, in many ways, the service I do attempt to provide, including the part where I work with attorneys to deal with cases that need a more serious tact. The problem is that going to attorneys is always expensive and there is no way to easily bring that down to a level that one would consider readily affordable to most people.

    I do try to keep my rates extremely low so I can help more people, but there are things beyond my control. For this reason, I've also been looking at partnering with pro bono groups and others that might be able to help at a significantly reduced cost. I'll be posting more on this as I'm able to make it work.
  • The hotlinking issue is a tough one. Changing the image out can raise issues on its own, especially if you use something that might be "offensive" or "libelous". I've seen cases where such swap outs resulted in more hostility toward the victim than the plagiarist, as crazy as that sounds.

    Blocking Hotlinking is probably a good idea.

    Regarding the EXIF data, I'm always surprised how many would-be image infringers forget that such data exists and make claims easily disproved by their own metadata. Truly a "facepalm" moment.
  • That is pretty funny. It never ceases to amaze me stupid would-be plagiarists are. Glad to hear that you're enjoying Numly!
  • A plagiarist lawyer, that one is pretty good too. I suppose even plagiarists get to run with their own kind. Of course, in my experience, such "lawyers" turn out to be anything but. I've seen a lot of blowhards in my day but have had no big problems.

    One has to be careful who they call a plagiarist, but there is no law against calling a spade a spade either.

    Still, I agree it's hard to call this a case of a stupid plagiarist, she did seem to do quite well with it in the end...
  • Our blog Bent Society has been plagiarised by The Independent Newspaper in the UK and by the UK Sunday Times. Here is link to the facts: http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/search/labe...

    And here is a link to the debate and research we are conducting into this case and the wider issue of media plagiarising blogs: http://onlinejournalismresearch.ning.com/forum/...

    What do people think about journalists stealing without referencing their sources?
  • I'm sorry to hear about your recent plagiarism problems, obviously I think nothing good about any plagiarism, whether it is ia journalist or another blogger.

    I hope that you're able to find some resolution on these matters and that justice is done. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know.
  • I also have used Numly for a couple of years. I originally used the WordPress plugin, but I don't think that has been updated or supported for a long time. I was manually attaching the Numly generated information to my posts for a while, but find that I have not been doing it for the past few months. Just too cumbersome to remember to do for every post. I think I will be discontinuing using Numly. Too bad as it is a good service, just needs to be more easily incorporated into WordPress.

    Jonathan - Do you still use Numly? I don't see it here.
  • This has happened to me indirectly and to other bloggers I know. I have written about things that have later been taken up in daily newspapers and once even on radio. They are usually careful enough to not copy exactly so I question whether it is really plagiarism. Often newspapers will monitor blogs for content that seems like it deserves a wider audience. I am not sure there is anything worng with that. Sometimes I am even glad to see something picked up by the "mainstream" media from a blog and get wider publicity.
  • Well my little story is not about online plagiarism, however, might be of interest. Part of my work involves art direction, on two occassions during a job search several years ago i was told by the prospective employers that my work was not mine, as it turns out there had been more than one person showing my work and claiming it as theirs, in one case, getting them the job. Having to defend myself against accusations of plagiarism, when i was in fact the one plagiarised was mind numbing. Online is another matter altogether, unfortunately, what i have found is that the methods for plagiarism are becoming increasingly sophisitcated, i have lost track of the number of Wordpress plugins i have found that steal content and rewrite it. Its a sad state of affairs, and in the end for what, so that some people can make 20 dollars a month from running a hundred websites with stolen information. Not sure whther to laugh or cry. In any zase, i wish you all the best in your endeavours, and can only hope that methods may be implemented which prevent this type of thing from happening.
  • No, I don't. The reason being that the plugin causes problems with 2.7 and I had to remove it. Fortunately though, I JUST received word (yesterday actually) that a new author has taken up the plugin. I'll have more on that soon. My advice to you would be to hold tight for a week or two and see if anything comes of this. If it does, it could make Numly better than ever.

    I'll keep everyone posted!
  • I'm sorry to hear about the first case. I have to wonder if you ever tracked down who it was that was doing that? However, I don't find it altogether surprising, I hear about such "portfolio" plagiarism pretty regularly. Fortunately, people who do it usually don't last long at the jobs they get, the reason being that they're frauds from the outset.

    I agree that the online situation is pretty grim. We, content creators, are under attack from a lot of different sides including, as you put it, synonymized plagiarism, truncated plagiarism and other spam techniques. I've had a lot of luck in shutting down spam blog networks by attacking the revenue stream, but even my victories are but drops in a bucket.

    It's going to take a coordinated push from multiple sides (ISPs, copyright holders, etc.) to make any real change.
  • Thanks for the commiserations, unfortunately whether they last at their jobs or not does not in any way compensate the damage they cause, and yes i did track down the culprits however i found myself still in the situation where i had to defend myself. Your expereinces with the female 'friend' and the 10 year old poet are all too common. Plagiarism such as what you mention by the likes of Coldplay has and always will be the norm. Such a sad state of affairs really.

    It does console that you have been able to shut down spam blog networks, however i am afraid that a coordinated push is most likely impossible due to the fact that the ISPs are actually benefitting. It reminds me a great deal of the situation with music and movies, where the creators of the pieces are suffering, and i have often thought about this situation when i ran a record company. The problem is not limited to the actual file sharing programs or their users, it is in fact promoted by the purveyors of hardware, utilising as they do references to the possibiity of downloading copyrighted material as a selling point. Its irony of the highest order that maunfacturers such as Apple, after promoting their wares using these techniques have stepped in and created alternative download networks whereby they are benefiting from the situation directly, replacing the record companies and distribution networks with their newer model.
  • Here's another dumbass plagiarist for your collection.

    Some years ago, I was creative director for a sizeable Toronto agency, interviewing applicant writers. One guy was "particularly proud of" one ad series in his portfolio.

    "So was I, when I wrote them", I said... and pointed to the framed copies on the office wall behind him.

    He at least had the good grace to blush and leave quietly.
  • Ok, that is priceless. I have to admit, that one is good. As I see it, that is stupid on at least two different levels. First, he either didn't know who he was interviewing with or didn't know who actually wrote the ads in question (something you should probably look up when plagiarizing) and second he thought he could get away with plagiarism in the advertising world. I suppose it is possible, but in my experience advertisers usually know at least which company produced which ads, or can trivially look it up. It would have been easy to disprove even without him having the misfortune of running into the original author.

    Thank you for the story and congrats on running at least one plagiarist out the door!
  • AFAIK, the lawyer really is one, and the plagiarized and/or poorly cited parts didn't make it into the published book. (There are plenty of fanfic bits in it, but they do seem to be her own work.) Plagiarism is certainly a huge problem on the internet, but so are personal vendettas like the one Laura has against the people mentioned there, other fan-run wikis, the Organization for Transformative Works (which I'm involved with), anyone internet famous who doesn't want to be friends with her, etc. Considering she's added blatantly false info about me to her wiki before, I'd take anything there with a grain of salt.

    I love your blog though. I'll definitely be checking out your other posts.

    --Franzi
  • MikeRT
    The best retaliation I have ever seen was done when a critic of Radley Balko of The Agitator fame stole some of his content and linked the images back to theagitator.com. Balko changed the images to "Obama dildos."
blog comments powered by Disqus