<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Copyscape Tops Plagiarism Checker Testing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Review: Copyscape Batch Search &#124; PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-129581</link> <dc:creator>Review: Copyscape Batch Search &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:27:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-129581</guid> <description>[...] Still, if you have a use for this service, I would not shy away from it. At five cents per search it is a very solid deal overall and Copyscape has always performed well in plagiarism detection, even taking top honors recently in a head-to-head competition. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Still, if you have a use for this service, I would not shy away from it. At five cents per search it is a very solid deal overall and Copyscape has always performed well in plagiarism detection, even taking top honors recently in a head-to-head competition. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: max191</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-128539</link> <dc:creator>max191</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:17:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-128539</guid> <description>Really great information in your blog. Please write more so that we can get more updates in your blog. Thanks a lot!&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;dofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;weber grill recipes&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great information in your blog. Please write more so that we can get more updates in your blog. Thanks a lot!<br
/>regards<br
/><a
rel="dofollow" href="http://www.charcoalgrillsite.com" rel="nofollow">weber grill recipes</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vector</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-128407</link> <dc:creator>Vector</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-128407</guid> <description>After reading this article &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1486856&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t trust any plagiarisms</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this article <a
href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1486856" rel="nofollow"></a><a
href="http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t.." rel="nofollow">http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t..</a>.<br
/>I don&#39;t trust any plagiarisms</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 1st International Plagiarism Detection Competition &#124; PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-125498</link> <dc:creator>1st International Plagiarism Detection Competition &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-125498</guid> <description>[...] This is not the first time a broard-array of plagiarism detection suites have been put to the test. In November of last year, Dr. Debora Weber-Wulff, a professor at the University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, announced the results of her second round of testing and gave the top prize to Copyscape. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is not the first time a broard-array of plagiarism detection suites have been put to the test. In November of last year, Dr. Debora Weber-Wulff, a professor at the University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, announced the results of her second round of testing and gave the top prize to Copyscape. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Plagium: A Copyscape Alternative &#124; PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-125462</link> <dc:creator>Plagium: A Copyscape Alternative &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-125462</guid> <description>[...] reputation has been very well earned. They recently took top honors in a round of plagiarism checker testing services, which put them against several much more expensive [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reputation has been very well earned. They recently took top honors in a round of plagiarism checker testing services, which put them against several much more expensive [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geri</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-125136</link> <dc:creator>Geri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-125136</guid> <description>Hey guys,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can anyone help me whenever I put the URL of my new article in my blog..and I pass it trough copyscape I can see around8 to 10 results that show that have some words as the ones on my website. However when I open each link additionally to see what words were exactly copied there are no words...but just  meta tags, or keywords or &lt;title...html...&gt; and stuff like this. it is full with all these. I write my content so I know is unique but still copyscape shows that it matches somebody&#039;s else wordpress theme meta tags or keywords ...and it is weird. Is there anything I can do?Maybe I have not included some script in my wordpress or what?Please help me I do not want Google spiders to think I have similar content to somebody&#039;s else even if it is not words.&lt;br&gt;thank you a lot&lt;br&gt;Geri</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p><p>Can anyone help me whenever I put the URL of my new article in my blog..and I pass it trough copyscape I can see around8 to 10 results that show that have some words as the ones on my website. However when I open each link additionally to see what words were exactly copied there are no words&#8230;but just  meta tags, or keywords or &lt;title&#8230;html&#8230;&gt; and stuff like this. it is full with all these. I write my content so I know is unique but still copyscape shows that it matches somebody&#39;s else wordpress theme meta tags or keywords &#8230;and it is weird. Is there anything I can do?Maybe I have not included some script in my wordpress or what?Please help me I do not want Google spiders to think I have similar content to somebody&#39;s else even if it is not words.<br
/>thank you a lot<br
/>Geri</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: free slots</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-124965</link> <dc:creator>free slots</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:49:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-124965</guid> <description>CopyScape is the ultimate resource for checking copy over the Internet. I&#039;ve used their site to find people that were using my content without my permission. I recommend that anyone concerned with copyright&lt;br&gt;infringement put the CopyScape seal on their web site to stop others from taking their content.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CopyScape is the ultimate resource for checking copy over the Internet. I&#39;ve used their site to find people that were using my content without my permission. I recommend that anyone concerned with copyright<br
/>infringement put the CopyScape seal on their web site to stop others from taking their content.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeffrey Smith</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-123696</link> <dc:creator>Jeffrey Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:12:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-123696</guid> <description>Try the plagiarismdetect.com system. It is the best alternative to all plagiarism detection systems and it is absolutely FREE!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try the plagiarismdetect.com system. It is the best alternative to all plagiarism detection systems and it is absolutely FREE!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nortypig &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyscape Gets First Place</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-123461</link> <dc:creator>nortypig &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Copyscape Gets First Place</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:20:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-123461</guid> <description>[...] Bailey at PlagiarismToday writes that plagiarism detector software Copyscape placed first in a recent comparative test of it&#8217;s [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bailey at PlagiarismToday writes that plagiarism detector software Copyscape placed first in a recent comparative test of it&#8217;s [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/11/04/copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-123460</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:50:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=2035#comment-123460</guid> <description>I&#039;m glad that you thought the advice to be sound. I&#039;ve been using different systems long enough to know that no one is 100% and likely never will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sadly, it seems that this industry has attracted some less than honest players to the field. We both remember well the iPlagiarismCheck debacle and to have them bought out by another company using the name (though apparently the new company is at least somewhat more legit), is a clear warning sign of trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not really sure why dishonest companies are attracted to this industry. It is far from easy money and the market, especially on the academic side, is relatively thin. There is a great deal of need for these services and money to be made, but it requires hard work and dedication, something a potential scammer would likely lack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless, I&#039;m glad for your tests, mainly because they expose the truly bad companies and highlight those that are at least working to get the best results possible. Thank you very much for all that you do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad that you thought the advice to be sound. I&#39;ve been using different systems long enough to know that no one is 100% and likely never will be.</p><p>Sadly, it seems that this industry has attracted some less than honest players to the field. We both remember well the iPlagiarismCheck debacle and to have them bought out by another company using the name (though apparently the new company is at least somewhat more legit), is a clear warning sign of trouble.</p><p>I&#39;m not really sure why dishonest companies are attracted to this industry. It is far from easy money and the market, especially on the academic side, is relatively thin. There is a great deal of need for these services and money to be made, but it requires hard work and dedication, something a potential scammer would likely lack.</p><p>Regardless, I&#39;m glad for your tests, mainly because they expose the truly bad companies and highlight those that are at least working to get the best results possible. Thank you very much for all that you do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-18 19:49:42 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      19
Cached queries:     2
Total query time:   0.016
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |    0.001 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2008' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='11' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='4' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'copyscape-tops-plagiarism-checker-testing' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '2035' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (2035) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (2035)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2010-02-18 19:27:17'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-10-01 14:17:40'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-09-06 21:05:32'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-05-13 17:28:02'
   14 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-05-07 19:05:36'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-03-28 10:42:19'
   16 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-03-09 02:49:49'
   17 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-12-01 12:12:48'
   18 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-11-04 23:20:42'
   19 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 2035 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-11-04 20:50:02'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_828b4d400a8dbe638e937c2d03c057ec
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.530s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 GMT
ETag:               "c2f9cd86c24cda3b43d77e39b7d48669"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->