<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Republishing Email: The Great Debate</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-129041</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1845#comment-129041</guid> <description>I&#039;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#039;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The choice is up to the reader.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#39;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#39;s.</p><p>The choice is up to the reader.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-128070</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1845#comment-128070</guid> <description>I&#039;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#039;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The choice is up to the reader.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#39;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#39;s.</p><p>The choice is up to the reader.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-123355</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1845#comment-123355</guid> <description>I&#039;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#039;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The choice is up to the reader.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not going to discuss the philosophy or even how I feel about copyrighted emails, I just want to note that, under current copyright law, there is no doubt that emails qualify for copyright protection. There is little dispute of that fact. The point of this article was to show a legal debate and the complexities around the issue, not to make a philosophical statement. It can be used to protect one&#39;s own writing in email format or to stay out of trouble when seeking to republish someone else&#39;s.</p><p>The choice is up to the reader.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A Little Early October Weekend Link Love&#160;&#124;&#160;Freelance Writing Jobs</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-123350</link> <dc:creator>A Little Early October Weekend Link Love&#160;&#124;&#160;Freelance Writing Jobs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1845#comment-123350</guid> <description>[...] Republishing Email: The Great Debate at Plagiarism Today [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Republishing Email: The Great Debate at Plagiarism Today [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wow</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/10/02/republishing-email-the-great-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-123342</link> <dc:creator>Wow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:08:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1845#comment-123342</guid> <description>You have got to be kidding me. First 1&#039;s and 0&#039;s now you want to copyright my EMAIL? This is already out of hand. These copyright happy people don&#039;t realize what they are doing to the creativity of our world and culture. Just remember for every action there is a positive and negative. Positive in your eyes might be Copyrighting Emails. Negative is, well pirates.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have got to be kidding me. First 1&#39;s and 0&#39;s now you want to copyright my EMAIL? This is already out of hand. These copyright happy people don&#39;t realize what they are doing to the creativity of our world and culture. Just remember for every action there is a positive and negative. Positive in your eyes might be Copyrighting Emails. Negative is, well pirates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-21 00:17:05 -->