<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BackType: Republishing Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hanum</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-128753</link>
		<dc:creator>hanum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-128753</guid>
		<description>best comment search engine which ever I found, cool. Nice info sharing, so informatif posting. Thank&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best comment search engine which ever I found, cool. Nice info sharing, so informatif posting. Thank&#39;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamPieniazek</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-128156</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamPieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-128156</guid>
		<description>How do you feel about the wordpress plugin for BackType that allows bloggers to import external comments about their post (say from reddit, Digg, and other blogs) and republish it on their site?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I see it as a valuable service for me and my readers and allows me to bring the conversation back to my blog (which is the original source of these comments). Is it plagiarism though or do bloggers have some right to repost comments about their article on their site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you feel about the wordpress plugin for BackType that allows bloggers to import external comments about their post (say from reddit, Digg, and other blogs) and republish it on their site?</p>
<p>Personally, I see it as a valuable service for me and my readers and allows me to bring the conversation back to my blog (which is the original source of these comments). Is it plagiarism though or do bloggers have some right to repost comments about their article on their site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamPieniazek</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-125671</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamPieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-125671</guid>
		<description>How do you feel about the wordpress plugin for BackType that allows bloggers to import external comments about their post (say from reddit, Digg, and other blogs) and republish it on their site?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I see it as a valuable service for me and my readers and allows me to bring the conversation back to my blog (which is the original source of these comments). Is it plagiarism though or do bloggers have some right to repost comments about their article on their site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you feel about the wordpress plugin for BackType that allows bloggers to import external comments about their post (say from reddit, Digg, and other blogs) and republish it on their site?</p>
<p>Personally, I see it as a valuable service for me and my readers and allows me to bring the conversation back to my blog (which is the original source of these comments). Is it plagiarism though or do bloggers have some right to repost comments about their article on their site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wholesale Clothing</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-124864</link>
		<dc:creator>Wholesale Clothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-124864</guid>
		<description>The post  really nice , i like it ,thanks for sharing,thanks for your post, i will keep read your blog everyday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post  really nice , i like it ,thanks for sharing,thanks for your post, i will keep read your blog everyday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-123325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-123325</guid>
		<description>My biggest beef, in all honesty, remains that there is no way for the commenter to opt out. It seems a bit backwards to require the Webmaster of all the sites a person comments on to blacklist the spider for someone to be removed. Something that is commenter-centric needs to have a commenter-centric opt out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not wholly comfortable with their displaying full comments, especially on longer works, I think it is an infringement and would be held as such, but I still see a lot of potential for this service. Let us hope they find a way to balance the issues with the benefits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you very much for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest beef, in all honesty, remains that there is no way for the commenter to opt out. It seems a bit backwards to require the Webmaster of all the sites a person comments on to blacklist the spider for someone to be removed. Something that is commenter-centric needs to have a commenter-centric opt out.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not wholly comfortable with their displaying full comments, especially on longer works, I think it is an infringement and would be held as such, but I still see a lot of potential for this service. Let us hope they find a way to balance the issues with the benefits.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keren Dagan</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-123316</link>
		<dc:creator>Keren Dagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/09/11/backtype-republishing-comments/#comment-123316</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not with you here:( &lt;br&gt;My comment is not a blog post. I can claim it on backtype. It has link to my blog. I have no problem if it is copied or indexed by search engines. And I want to read the full comments without the need to navigate to the target post.&lt;br&gt;In my mind, the value of this service exceed this little vice.&lt;br&gt;I do agree with you that there should be a clear and easy option to opt out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll read your answer on backtype (fully):)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I&#39;m not with you here:( <br />My comment is not a blog post. I can claim it on backtype. It has link to my blog. I have no problem if it is copied or indexed by search engines. And I want to read the full comments without the need to navigate to the target post.<br />In my mind, the value of this service exceed this little vice.<br />I do agree with you that there should be a clear and easy option to opt out. </p>
<p>I&#39;ll read your answer on backtype (fully):)</p>
<p>Keren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      15
Cached queries:     0
Total query time:   0.010
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2008' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='9' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='11' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'backtype-republishing-comments' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '1711' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (1711) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (1711)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-11-04 03:47:12'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-06-01 22:32:27'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-06-01 21:32:27'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-02-24 15:03:25'
   14 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-09-29 19:34:42'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 1711 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-09-28 02:50:50'
-->