Comments on: USCO Electronic Registration Goes Live http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: Problems Within the Electronic Copyright Office « Copywrong http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-137841 Problems Within the Electronic Copyright Office « Copywrong Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:13:37 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-137841 [...] the U.S. Copyright Office’s Electronic Copyright Office (ECO) system went online in July of 2008, it was supposed to revolutionize and modernize the way the USCO did [...] [...] the U.S. Copyright Office’s Electronic Copyright Office (ECO) system went online in July of 2008, it was supposed to revolutionize and modernize the way the USCO did [...]

]]> By: Copyright Fees Increase August 1st | Grind EFX http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-127022 Copyright Fees Increase August 1st | Grind EFX Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:40:47 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-127022 [...] electronic process is not perfect - early reviews detailed some of the problems with it, and the Washington Times noted that it suffers from delays. [...] [...] electronic process is not perfect – early reviews detailed some of the problems with it, and the Washington Times noted that it suffers from delays. [...]

]]> By: The Future of the Copyright Office | PlagiarismToday http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-125610 The Future of the Copyright Office | PlagiarismToday Tue, 26 May 2009 18:34:12 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-125610 [...] the U.S. Copyright Office’s Electronic Copyright Office (ECO) system went online in July of 2008, it was supposed to revolutionize and modernize the way the USCO did [...] [...] the U.S. Copyright Office’s Electronic Copyright Office (ECO) system went online in July of 2008, it was supposed to revolutionize and modernize the way the USCO did [...]

]]> By: Tech Blog http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-129034 Tech Blog Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:51:57 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-129034 Its a great idea to make it all online, it will make things a lot quicker and easier. Its a great idea to make it all online, it will make things a lot quicker and easier.

]]> By: Consumer Electronics http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-128087 Consumer Electronics Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:51:57 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-128087 Its a great idea to make it all online, it will make things a lot quicker and easier. Its a great idea to make it all online, it will make things a lot quicker and easier.

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-121098 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:02:31 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-121098 They actually did it quite sneakily. I didn't get the announcement, I must not be subscribed to that list anymore, but if you visit their page about the ECO system here: <a href="http://www.copyright.gov/eco/index.html">http://www.copyright.gov/eco/index.html</a> You can see at the bottom that it was revised on the 21st of June. It seems likely that they made the changes, tested it "live" for a few days and then made the announcement.<br><br>Regardless, if we are to believe the datestamp on the site, which should be accurate, the changes were made on the 21st, not the 1st. Still, it is a case of splitting hairs. How and when they chose to roll it out is not as important as the fact they did...<br><br>Thank you for the information though. I'll have to make sure my email is on that list! They actually did it quite sneakily. I didn’t get the announcement, I must not be subscribed to that list anymore, but if you visit their page about the ECO system here: http://www.copyright.gov/eco/index.html You can see at the bottom that it was revised on the 21st of June. It seems likely that they made the changes, tested it “live” for a few days and then made the announcement.

Regardless, if we are to believe the datestamp on the site, which should be accurate, the changes were made on the 21st, not the 1st. Still, it is a case of splitting hairs. How and when they chose to roll it out is not as important as the fact they did…

Thank you for the information though. I’ll have to make sure my email is on that list!

]]> By: lauren f http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-121097 lauren f Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:20:31 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-121097 Note--eCO registration actually went live on July 1, 2008, not June 21. If you subscribed to the Copyright newsnet email, an announcement did go out on June 30, but I can't say whether they publicized this anywhere else. Note–eCO registration actually went live on July 1, 2008, not June 21. If you subscribed to the Copyright newsnet email, an announcement did go out on June 30, but I can’t say whether they publicized this anywhere else.

]]> By: Linkroll: Links to Ideas Worth Knowing | UsefulArts.us http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/07/03/usco-electronic-registration-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-120560 Linkroll: Links to Ideas Worth Knowing | UsefulArts.us Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:05:04 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1291#comment-120560 [...] Electronic Copyright Registration Goes Live: Our friend Jonathan Bailey describes the US Copyright Offices new online filing system as “severely flawed.” Still, it’s a first step, and one hopes for improvement. [...] [...] Electronic Copyright Registration Goes Live: Our friend Jonathan Bailey describes the US Copyright Offices new online filing system as “severely flawed.” Still, it’s a first step, and one hopes for improvement. [...]

]]>