<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AVGN Loses, Regains YouTube Account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: irate gamer</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-130716</link>
		<dc:creator>irate gamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-130716</guid>
		<description>he sucks i wipe my ass with him. bangalang</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he sucks i wipe my ass with him. bangalang</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-129173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-129173</guid>
		<description>Well, if you use U.S.-based services, such as YouTube, or U.S.-based search engines, such as Google, you are just as subject to the DMCA as any U.S. citizen. That&#039;s the nature of the law... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you use U.S.-based services, such as YouTube, or U.S.-based search engines, such as Google, you are just as subject to the DMCA as any U.S. citizen. That&#039;s the nature of the law&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icarid</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-124885</link>
		<dc:creator>icarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-124885</guid>
		<description>and this is why we don&#039;t have to the DMCA in  Canada (though i am waiting for our government to blatantly sell us out with a renamed bill c-61 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and this is why we don&#039;t have to the DMCA in  Canada (though i am waiting for our government to blatantly sell us out with a renamed bill c-61</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-121419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-121419</guid>
		<description>Justin: I am just username plagiarismtoday there. I only have two videos up there right now. One I did for this site and one for my haunted house. More will be coming soon though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin: I am just username plagiarismtoday there. I only have two videos up there right now. One I did for this site and one for my haunted house. More will be coming soon though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-106732</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-106732</guid>
		<description>OH really? Got a link to your channel? I&#039;d like to see some of your videos if you have any. I might even sign up myself! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH really? Got a link to your channel? I&#8217;d like to see some of your videos if you have any. I might even sign up myself! <img src='http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-121417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-121417</guid>
		<description>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes.Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true.It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes.Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true.It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-133102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-133102</guid>
		<description>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes.Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true.It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes.Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true.It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-106570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-106570</guid>
		<description>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes. 
 
Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true. 
 
It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin: The flagging system is interesting. On most hosts, you can not have a work removed for copyright infringement without a DMCA notice from the copyright holder. YouTube seems to allow group think to take over and let anyone report copyright infringement. From what I understand, if enough users flag something as infringing, they will remove it regardless of whether or not a DMCA notice is filed. This is completely counter to how U.S. law is supposed to work and that is supposed to help avoid these kinds of mistakes.</p>
<p>Granted, the Nerd was the victim of an actual DMCA, but that&#039;s not the point. I agree with you that far more content is removed erroneously due to flagging and YouTube &quot;wars&quot;. Sad, but true.</p>
<p>It is far too easy to get banned from YouTube though, one of the reasons I post videos to blip.tv instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-106266</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-106266</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mistakes&quot; like that are made all the time. I mean, you have no idea how people have been suspended from Youtube for speaking their mind. Let me be specific here. If you piss off enough people on Youtube, they&#039;ll flag your videos for copyright infringement. Here&#039;s the kicker, most of the people who make controversial videos has some copyright material on at least one of their videos. That&#039;s enough to get somebody suspended. ON the other hand, you do have people who are suspended for copyright infringement, when they have no copyrighted material on it. It&#039;s bullshit. If for some reason, somebody wants to get their channel suspended, all they have to do is tell Muslim jokes, and debate the religion of Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mistakes&#8221; like that are made all the time. I mean, you have no idea how people have been suspended from Youtube for speaking their mind. Let me be specific here. If you piss off enough people on Youtube, they&#8217;ll flag your videos for copyright infringement. Here&#8217;s the kicker, most of the people who make controversial videos has some copyright material on at least one of their videos. That&#8217;s enough to get somebody suspended. ON the other hand, you do have people who are suspended for copyright infringement, when they have no copyrighted material on it. It&#8217;s bullshit. If for some reason, somebody wants to get their channel suspended, all they have to do is tell Muslim jokes, and debate the religion of Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/05/21/avgn-loses-regains-youtube-account/comment-page-1/#comment-103733</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=1071#comment-103733</guid>
		<description>Yeah, totally! hehe. :) Big fan. I&#039;ve seen every video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, totally! hehe. <img src='http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Big fan. I&#8217;ve seen every video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 20:56:48 -->
