<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orphan Works Bills Introduced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-125794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-125794</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we can do something to stop the Orphan works bill through the courts. Hopefully so but money and lobbying are very powerful and a lot of large companies have a strong vested interest in the version being proposed.There is a need for a version of the orphan works bill and Google among others are big supporters of the proposal. However everyone agrees they are going too far in their demands.They aren&#039;t listening to the creators objections and the extent of the bill being proposed plus Googles recent grabbing of things that are not theirs (tied down), makes me think that we might be partly to blame again. By using their search engine we are giving them power.So for the hell of it, if you are using Firefox as a browser, you can delete Google as a search engine (which will be noticed). It&#039;s like voting.Bing is owned by Microsoft who are also pushing the bill through. There are a list of search engines that you can install listed here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:4/cat:all?sort=name&#124;leo://plh/https%3A*3*3addons%2Emozilla%2Eorg*3en-US*3firefox*3browse*3type%3A4*3cat%3Aall%3Fsort%3Dname/AW&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:4/cat:all?sort=name&#124;leo://plh/https%3A*3*3addons%2Emozilla%2Eorg*3en-US*3firefox*3browse*3type%3A4*3cat%3Aall%3Fsort%3Dname/AW&lt;/a&gt; N5?_t=tracking_disc ]It&#039;s possible to delete both Google and Bing from your search engine selection which would definitely get google etc, to sit up and pay attention.Goodsearch is a nice alternative&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goodsearch.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.goodsearch.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9674&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/.....&lt;/a&gt;This is a passively dynamic way of sending a message. It doesn&#039;t cost anything, the search engines are easy to install and a change is as good as a rest. I&#039;ve been using Good search for a week and it&#039;s fine.CheersTomFeel free to pass this on. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we can do something to stop the Orphan works bill through the courts. Hopefully so but money and lobbying are very powerful and a lot of large companies have a strong vested interest in the version being proposed.There is a need for a version of the orphan works bill and Google among others are big supporters of the proposal. However everyone agrees they are going too far in their demands.They aren&#039;t listening to the creators objections and the extent of the bill being proposed plus Googles recent grabbing of things that are not theirs (tied down), makes me think that we might be partly to blame again. By using their search engine we are giving them power.So for the hell of it, if you are using Firefox as a browser, you can delete Google as a search engine (which will be noticed). It&#039;s like voting.Bing is owned by Microsoft who are also pushing the bill through. There are a list of search engines that you can install listed here: <a href="http://[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:4/cat:all?sort=name|leo://plh/https%3A*3*3addons%2Emozilla%2Eorg*3en-US*3firefox*3browse*3type%3A4*3cat%3Aall%3Fsort%3Dname/AW" rel="nofollow">[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:4/cat:all?sort=name|leo://plh/https%3A*3*3addons%2Emozilla%2Eorg*3en-US*3firefox*3browse*3type%3A4*3cat%3Aall%3Fsort%3Dname/AW</a> N5?_t=tracking_disc ]It&#039;s possible to delete both Google and Bing from your search engine selection which would definitely get google etc, to sit up and pay attention.Goodsearch is a nice alternative<a href="http://www.goodsearch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodsearch.com/</a><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9674" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/&#8230;..</a>This is a passively dynamic way of sending a message. It doesn&#039;t cost anything, the search engines are easy to install and a change is as good as a rest. I&#039;ve been using Good search for a week and it&#039;s fine.CheersTomFeel free to pass this on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VBalasubramani (VBal</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-124348</link>
		<dc:creator>VBalasubramani (VBal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-124348</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/plagiarismtoday&quot;&gt;@plagiarismtoday&lt;/a&gt; versions of just introduced orphan works (copyright) legislation &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/TdsE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/TdsE&lt;/a&gt; - chances of passage are [slim] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;<a href="http://twitter.com/plagiarismtoday&quot;&gt;@plagiarismtoday" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/plagiarismtoday&quot;&gt;@plagiarismtoday</a> versions of just introduced orphan works (copyright) legislation <a href="http://bit.ly/TdsE" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/TdsE</a> &#8211; chances of passage are [slim]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BaLaM</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-124093</link>
		<dc:creator>BaLaM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-124093</guid>
		<description>А интересно, сам автор читает комментарии к этому сообщению. Или мы тут сами для себя пишем? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>А интересно, сам автор читает комментарии к этому сообщению. Или мы тут сами для себя пишем? <img src='http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-131722</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-131722</guid>
		<description>I have to say that copyright infringers like Shepard Fairey will glow if this bill is passed. The man already steals from political artists who are no known widely in the US. If this bill passes he could steal from anyone and not have to worry about paying much if anything in royalties. I wish more people again the orphan works bill would have the courage to speak out again artists like Shepard Fairey and even Damien Hirst in order to make it clear that we will not support artists who violate the copyright of fellow artists or other individuals. I just don&#039;t understand it. If a kid on Facebook alters the work of someone else the kid will be given the third degree by other artists but if a popular artist does the same it is acceptable. You can&#039;t say that you stand against the orphan works bill while allowing these popular artists to walk all over everything we believe in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that copyright infringers like Shepard Fairey will glow if this bill is passed. The man already steals from political artists who are no known widely in the US. If this bill passes he could steal from anyone and not have to worry about paying much if anything in royalties. I wish more people again the orphan works bill would have the courage to speak out again artists like Shepard Fairey and even Damien Hirst in order to make it clear that we will not support artists who violate the copyright of fellow artists or other individuals. I just don&#039;t understand it. If a kid on Facebook alters the work of someone else the kid will be given the third degree by other artists but if a popular artist does the same it is acceptable. You can&#039;t say that you stand against the orphan works bill while allowing these popular artists to walk all over everything we believe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airbrush Tour &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Orphan Works Act - Bad For Artists.</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-123321</link>
		<dc:creator>Airbrush Tour &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Orphan Works Act - Bad For Artists.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-123321</guid>
		<description>[...] PlagiarismToday.com for more. Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlagiarismToday.com for more. Social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-123285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-123285</guid>
		<description>The honest answer is that I do not know. I have not heard what any of the candidates have said on this issue yet as it has not been a major issue on the trail and I don&#039;t think either have been involved directly up to this point. Please, if anyone knows, correct me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The honest answer is that I do not know. I have not heard what any of the candidates have said on this issue yet as it has not been a major issue on the trail and I don&#39;t think either have been involved directly up to this point. Please, if anyone knows, correct me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheekyM</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-123284</link>
		<dc:creator>CheekyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-123284</guid>
		<description>Do you think Obama is for the Orphan Works bill? I read a post about Shepard Fairey that hinted at the possibility. I put the link in the website space if you want to take a look. Shepard has violated current copyright law and Obama must have been aware of that when making him the official artist for his camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Obama is for the Orphan Works bill? I read a post about Shepard Fairey that hinted at the possibility. I put the link in the website space if you want to take a look. Shepard has violated current copyright law and Obama must have been aware of that when making him the official artist for his camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dena Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-114765</link>
		<dc:creator>Dena Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-114765</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-114705&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jonathan Bailey&lt;/a&gt; - 

Dear Jonathan, 

Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).

I am not sure who you are referring to in the &quot;mainstream media&quot; or how they will &quot;lose&quot;.

Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.

Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.  
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm
&quot;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&quot;

The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#039;s bottle so those who&#039;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.

Artists&#039; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.

There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  

People in Congress are taking note!

It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#039;t already) and offer them up for a buck.

I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.

I highly recommend you 
1. Read the bills and the archives at 
http://www.illustratorspartnership.org

2. Sign the petition &quot;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&quot;
http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html

3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121 
tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written

4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress
the best letters are at: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/

We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.

Best regards,
Dena Matthews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-114705' rel="nofollow">@Jonathan Bailey</a> &#8211; </p>
<p>Dear Jonathan, </p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).</p>
<p>I am not sure who you are referring to in the &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; or how they will &#8220;lose&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.</p>
<p>Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.<br />
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm" rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm</a><br />
&#8220;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#8217;s bottle so those who&#8217;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.</p>
<p>Artists&#8217; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.</p>
<p>There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  </p>
<p>People in Congress are taking note!</p>
<p>It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#8217;t already) and offer them up for a buck.</p>
<p>I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.</p>
<p>I highly recommend you<br />
1. Read the bills and the archives at<br />
<a href="http://www.illustratorspartnership.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.illustratorspartnership.org</a></p>
<p>2. Sign the petition &#8220;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html</a></p>
<p>3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121<br />
tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written</p>
<p>4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress<br />
the best letters are at: <a href="http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/</a></p>
<p>We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Dena Matthews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dena Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-121245</link>
		<dc:creator>Dena Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-121245</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114705&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jonathan Bailey&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear Jonathan, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not sure who you are referring to in the &quot;mainstream media&quot; or how they will &quot;lose&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm&quot;&gt;http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activit...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#039;s bottle so those who&#039;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Artists&#039; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People in Congress are taking note!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#039;t already) and offer them up for a buck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I highly recommend you &lt;br&gt;1. Read the bills and the archives at &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illustratorspartnership.org&quot;&gt;http://www.illustratorspartnership.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Sign the petition &quot;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html&quot;&gt;http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121 &lt;br&gt;tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress&lt;br&gt;the best letters are at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/&quot;&gt;http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best regards,&lt;br&gt;Dena Matthews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-114705" rel="nofollow">@Jonathan Bailey</a> &#8211; </p>
<p>Dear Jonathan, </p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).</p>
<p>I am not sure who you are referring to in the &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; or how they will &#8220;lose&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.</p>
<p>Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.  <br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activit&#8230;</a><br />&#8220;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#8217;s bottle so those who&#8217;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.</p>
<p>Artists&#8217; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.</p>
<p>There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  </p>
<p>People in Congress are taking note!</p>
<p>It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#8217;t already) and offer them up for a buck.</p>
<p>I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.</p>
<p>I highly recommend you <br />1. Read the bills and the archives at <br /><a href="http://www.illustratorspartnership.org">http://www.illustratorspartnership.org</a></p>
<p>2. Sign the petition &#8220;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&#8221;<br /><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html">http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition&#8230;</a></p>
<p>3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121 <br />tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written</p>
<p>4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress<br />the best letters are at: <a href="http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/">http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/</a></p>
<p>We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />Dena Matthews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dena Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/25/orphan-works-bills-introduced/comment-page-1/#comment-133049</link>
		<dc:creator>Dena Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=977#comment-133049</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114705&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jonathan Bailey&lt;/a&gt; - Dear Jonathan, Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).I am not sure who you are referring to in the &quot;mainstream media&quot; or how they will &quot;lose&quot;.Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm&quot;&gt;http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activitie...&lt;/a&gt; 
&quot;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&quot;The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#039;s bottle so those who&#039;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.Artists&#039; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  People in Congress are taking note!It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#039;t already) and offer them up for a buck.I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.I highly recommend you  
1. Read the bills and the archives at  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illustratorspartnership.org&quot;&gt;http://www.illustratorspartnership.org&lt;/a&gt; 
 
2. Sign the petition &quot;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&quot; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html&quot;&gt;http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.h...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121  
tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress 
the best letters are at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/&quot;&gt;http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/&lt;/a&gt; 
 
We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.Best regards, 
Dena Matthews </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-114705" rel="nofollow">@Jonathan Bailey</a> &#8211; Dear Jonathan, Thank you for taking the time to consider my perspective (and that of thousands of rightsholders).I am not sure who you are referring to in the &quot;mainstream media&quot; or how they will &quot;lose&quot;.Rightsholders take no issue with certified archives, libraries and museums (the ones that hold dusty old books, prints, sculptures, photos, etc. that have been vetted in their collection and not procured by the black market) to make works available for public display for the purpose of cultural heritage preservation.Sending a clear message to the US, on June 4, 2008, members of the European Union signed a Memorandum of Understanding (basically a law, for all intents and purposes) that is a true Orphan Works legislation.  </p>
<p>&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm" rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/hleg/hleg_meetings/index_en.htm</a><br />
&#8220;&gt;<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activitie..." rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activitie&#8230;</a><br />
&quot;It will help cultural institutions to digitise books, films and music whose authors are unknown, making them available to the public online.&quot;The bills before Congress are a bait and switch.  They claim to be helping dusty, old, esteemed places- you know, the ones with the tall, white pillars-  but what they really do is crack open the genie&#039;s bottle so those who&#039;ve already snapped up the domain names for orphan works and vacuumed the internet for every image that every existed there can package it up and make a buck.Artists&#039; rights groups that I am associated with have been working on suggested amendments though they are not publicly disclosed at this time.  Once they are made public, I would be happy to share that with your readers.There is no impetus to rush a massive piece of copyright reform stealthily through Congress.  This must be slowed down and carefully studied.  The Copyright Office never performed a market impact study on those who manage their copyrights.  What about the victims of Katrina?  Many will never be able to participate in the registries- they have lost their works, their studios, their homes and sadly, many lost their lives.  Many victims are unlocatable.  Is that any reason to victimize them all over again?  People in Congress are taking note!It is not inevitable that this bill will pass this session.  Rightsholders are making an impact and garnering support for our views.  You are right though, that this problem is not going away.  The giant corporations (the digital libraries, archives and museums of the 21st century) want to get us pesky copyright holders out of the way so they can digitize our collections (if they haven&#039;t already) and offer them up for a buck.I hope I have shed some more light on the hidden problems that were crafted into The [Shawn Bentley] Orphan Works Act of 2008.I highly recommend you </p>
<p>1. Read the bills and the archives at </p>
<p>&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://www.illustratorspartnership.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.illustratorspartnership.org</a><br />
&#8220;&gt;<a href="http://www.illustratorspartnership.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.illustratorspartnership.org</a></p>
<p>2. Sign the petition &quot;A Million People Against the Orphan Works Bill&quot;</p>
<p>&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.html</a><br />
&#8220;&gt;<a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.h..." rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/Stop2913/petition.h&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>3. Call the capitol hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121 </p>
<p>tell your members of Congress why you oppose the bills as written4. Personalize and send faxes and emails to your members of Congress</p>
<p>the best letters are at: &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/</a><br />
&#8220;&gt;<a href="http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/</a></p>
<p>We CAN make a difference against huge corporations spending countless dollars on this matter.  The politicians will listen if enough constituents make some noise. So, please, I urge you all to act now.Best regards,</p>
<p>Dena Matthews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 17:19:44 -->
