Comments on: Proposal: Feed Republishing List http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jim Goldstein http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-96902 Jim Goldstein Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:16:48 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-96902 I think this is a good idea as long as you're not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop's web site http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-content-theft/ I think this is a good idea as long as you’re not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop’s web site

http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-content-theft/

]]> By: Jim Goldstein http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-121297 Jim Goldstein Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:16:48 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-121297 I think this is a good idea as long as you're not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop's web site<br><br><a href="http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-content-theft/">http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equal...</a> I think this is a good idea as long as you’re not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop’s web site

http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equal…

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-121298 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:26:34 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-121298 Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on.Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote! Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on.Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote!

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-132916 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:26:34 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-132916 Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on.Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote! Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on.Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote!

]]> By: Jim Goldstein http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-133005 Jim Goldstein Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:16:48 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-133005 I think this is a good idea as long as you're not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop's web site<a href="http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-content-theft/" rel="nofollow">http://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-...</a> I think this is a good idea as long as you're not giving them links on your blog. no reason to help them out with search engine optimization with a link from a highly trafficed web sites. The last interesting case I heard in relation to this was via Raoul Pop's web sitehttp://www.raoulpop.com/2008/04/12/shyftr-equals-…

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-96906 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:26:34 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-96906 Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on. Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote! Jim: Thanks for the input and, if I do do this, rest assured I won't be giving any search engine juice to the scrapers. I'm going to work with my SEO buddies to make sure that doesn't happen, perhaps using a redirect system or something else to ensure that no search engine ranking is passed on.

Thanks for the link. I think I talked about it some in last week's Blog Herald column, my brain is fried so I can't remember, it was a great post that Raoul wrote!

]]> By: Voyagerfan5761 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-96879 Voyagerfan5761 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:36:04 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-96879 As they say, "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however..." (Or whatever the words are.) Joan makes a good point. I too think this would be a good idea, kind of like the spam domain lists we have now for email. User participation might be harder to get, though. As they say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however…” (Or whatever the words are.) Joan makes a good point. I too think this would be a good idea, kind of like the spam domain lists we have now for email. User participation might be harder to get, though.

]]> By: Voyagerfan5761 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-121295 Voyagerfan5761 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:36:04 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-121295 As they say, "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however..." (Or whatever the words are.) Joan makes a good point. I too think this would be a good idea, kind of like the spam domain lists we have now for email. User participation might be harder to get, though. As they say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however…” (Or whatever the words are.) Joan makes a good point. I too think this would be a good idea, kind of like the spam domain lists we have now for email. User participation might be harder to get, though.

]]> By: Spamboy http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-121294 Spamboy Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:35:08 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-121294 Since it is something that may require a high-degree of maintenance, perhaps placing it on the Wordpress Codex might not be a bad location (barring that it meets criteria to go there). Since it is something that may require a high-degree of maintenance, perhaps placing it on the WordPress Codex might not be a bad location (barring that it meets criteria to go there).

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/18/feature-proposal-feed-republishing-list/comment-page-1/#comment-121296 Jonathan Bailey Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:39:20 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=948#comment-121296 Joan: I see where you're headed with that. The problem is that I'm not sure how many of these sites there are. Is the number in the hundreds, dozens or just a handful. I'm personally aware of about six but these types of sites don't get discovered that regularly and usually result in a big stink when they do. It might be something to experiment with and see if it is practical and then kill off or transfer elsewhere if it isn't.Spamboy: I like that idea. Since the Codex is licensed for it, I can use the text both here and there so both WP users and PT readers can manipulate and contribute. This is something that would probably be best served by not being centralized. I might talk to some of my friends in the WP community about that.Voyagerfan: Thanks for the input, it might be interesting to see what happens though if we put this page in multiple locations and see if it can be crowdsourced, I think there is a possibility of it working, we'll just have to see. Joan: I see where you're headed with that. The problem is that I'm not sure how many of these sites there are. Is the number in the hundreds, dozens or just a handful. I'm personally aware of about six but these types of sites don't get discovered that regularly and usually result in a big stink when they do. It might be something to experiment with and see if it is practical and then kill off or transfer elsewhere if it isn't.Spamboy: I like that idea. Since the Codex is licensed for it, I can use the text both here and there so both WP users and PT readers can manipulate and contribute. This is something that would probably be best served by not being centralized. I might talk to some of my friends in the WP community about that.Voyagerfan: Thanks for the input, it might be interesting to see what happens though if we put this page in multiple locations and see if it can be crowdsourced, I think there is a possibility of it working, we'll just have to see.

]]>