<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Trend: Scraping Via Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitesh Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-133529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitesh Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-133529</guid>
		<description>Scrapping email is actually very fast. Considering that you gather more than thousands of active email addresses or those still in use, then it is all worth your extra time. This will actually get the job done way faster. Besides, you will not be able to gather as many emails as what you get from scraping of email addresses. 
for more info : &lt;a href=&quot;http://webextraction.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://webextraction.wordpress.com/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrapping email is actually very fast. Considering that you gather more than thousands of active email addresses or those still in use, then it is all worth your extra time. This will actually get the job done way faster. Besides, you will not be able to gather as many emails as what you get from scraping of email addresses.<br />
for more info : <a href="http://webextraction.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://webextraction.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Blogger CAPTCHA Cracked - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96986</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Blogger CAPTCHA Cracked - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96986</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Blogger service. Now would be an excellent time for sites that offer email subscriptions to check for any @blogger.com accounts and everyone to consider taking feed protection steps such as installing Antileech, creating a feed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Blogger service. Now would be an excellent time for sites that offer email subscriptions to check for any @blogger.com accounts and everyone to consider taking feed protection steps such as installing Antileech, creating a feed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Warning for Email List Admins - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96915</link>
		<dc:creator>A Warning for Email List Admins - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96915</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote an article about scraping via email. In it, I detailed how spam bloggers, especially those using Blogspot, would take an RSS feed, pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote an article about scraping via email. In it, I detailed how spam bloggers, especially those using Blogspot, would take an RSS feed, pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96907</guid>
		<description>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#039;m going to have more on this later this week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#8217;m going to have more on this later this week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121313</guid>
		<description>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#039;m going to have more on this later this week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#8217;m going to have more on this later this week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121312</guid>
		<description>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121311</guid>
		<description>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:name.gibberish@blogger.com&quot;&gt;name.gibberish@blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here... Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.</p>
<p>I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (<a href="mailto:name.gibberish@blogger.com">name.gibberish@blogger.com</a>) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#8217;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#8217;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#8217;t a glowing red flag to you.</p>
<p>Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here&#8230; Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-132991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-132991</guid>
		<description>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here... Wouldn&#039;t be the first time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here&#8230; Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96803</guid>
		<description>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this. 
 
I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you. 
 
Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here... Wouldn&#039;t be the first time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.</p>
<p>I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.</p>
<p>Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here&#8230; Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybele</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121310</link>
		<dc:creator>cybele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121310</guid>
		<description>Feedburner&#039;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#039;d do, pull the confirmation into a &quot;post&quot; and then click on it from there?Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search. (If the scrapers were smart they&#039;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedburner&#039;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#039;d do, pull the confirmation into a &quot;post&quot; and then click on it from there?Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search. (If the scrapers were smart they&#039;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 17:04:24 -->
