<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Trend: Scraping Via Email</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Google Blogger CAPTCHA Cracked - PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96986</link> <dc:creator>Google Blogger CAPTCHA Cracked - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96986</guid> <description>[...] on the Blogger service. Now would be an excellent time for sites that offer email subscriptions to check for any @blogger.com accounts and everyone to consider taking feed protection steps such as installing Antileech, creating a feed [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Blogger service. Now would be an excellent time for sites that offer email subscriptions to check for any @blogger.com accounts and everyone to consider taking feed protection steps such as installing Antileech, creating a feed [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A Warning for Email List Admins - PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96915</link> <dc:creator>A Warning for Email List Admins - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96915</guid> <description>[...] I wrote an article about scraping via email. In it, I detailed how spam bloggers, especially those using Blogspot, would take an RSS feed, pass [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote an article about scraping via email. In it, I detailed how spam bloggers, especially those using Blogspot, would take an RSS feed, pass [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96907</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96907</guid> <description>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#039;m going to have more on this later this week!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#8217;m going to have more on this later this week!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121313</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121313</guid> <description>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#039;m going to have more on this later this week!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Glad you liked the post! I&#8217;m going to have more on this later this week!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Goldstein</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96903</link> <dc:creator>Jim Goldstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96903</guid> <description>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Goldstein</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121312</link> <dc:creator>Jim Goldstein</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121312</guid> <description>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. This sheds a little more light into splogs that I was otherwise unaware of.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96803</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:49:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96803</guid> <description>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here... Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.</p><p>I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (name.gibberish@blogger.com) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#8217;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#8217;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#8217;t a glowing red flag to you.</p><p>Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here&#8230; Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121311</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:49:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121311</guid> <description>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:name.gibberish@blogger.com&quot;&gt;name.gibberish@blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#039;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#039;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#039;t a glowing red flag to you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here... Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybele: Exactly. I mentioned it briefly in the post but the confirmation link has to be clicked from the block as it will be pulled down as a new post. The post has to then be deleted. All services, if they are going to reply with CANSPAM, have to do this.</p><p>I can help you with the Blogspot ones, look for anything with this format (<a
href="mailto:name.gibberish@blogger.com">name.gibberish@blogger.com</a>) and you should have someone trying to scrape via RSS. However, I doubt they&#8217;re going to be dumb enough to use FeedBurner, they&#8217;re going to use a third party service such as SendMeRSS where it isn&#8217;t a glowing red flag to you.</p><p>Then again, I might be overestimating the scrapers here&#8230; Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cybele</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-96792</link> <dc:creator>cybele</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-96792</guid> <description>Feedburner&#039;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#039;d do, pull the confirmation into a &quot;post&quot; and then click on it from there?Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search.(If the scrapers were smart they&#039;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedburner&#8217;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#8217;d do, pull the confirmation into a &#8220;post&#8221; and then click on it from there?</p><p>Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search.</p><p>(If the scrapers were smart they&#8217;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cybele</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/04/15/new-trend-scraping-via-email/comment-page-1/#comment-121310</link> <dc:creator>cybele</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=931#comment-121310</guid> <description>Feedburner&#039;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#039;d do, pull the confirmation into a &quot;post&quot; and then click on it from there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(If the scrapers were smart they&#039;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedburner&#8217;s subscribe by email makes the end user click through a confirmation. Is that what they&#8217;d do, pull the confirmation into a &#8220;post&#8221; and then click on it from there?</p><p>Feedburner allows me to see all of the subscribers. Perhaps if I knew the construction or domain of these email addresses I could do a periodic search.</p><p>(If the scrapers were smart they&#8217;d filter out that footer that allows you to unsub though.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-18 19:49:42 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      19
Cached queries:     6
Total query time:   0.020
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |    0.002 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2008' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='4' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='15' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'new-trend-scraping-via-email' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '931' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (931) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (931)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.007 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-28 16:47:24'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-23 14:07:27'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-21 18:26:55'
   13 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-21 18:26:55'
   14 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-21 17:20:36'
   15 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-21 17:20:36'
   16 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-16 05:49:02'
   17 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-16 05:49:02'
   18 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-15 20:39:23'
   19 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 931 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-04-15 20:39:23'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_5c79817bbea4d7f36f3265501d74ce9d
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.491s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:33 GMT
ETag:               "03208a0d623ae2d7dd68c8178e9cd41c"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->