<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Blog Searching Fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Blog Search, Why The Spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94309</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Blog Search, Why The Spam?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94309</guid>
		<description>[...] Bailey posted an insightful article the other day on his blog, Plagiarism Today, about why blog search services have failed. In the post he raises an interesting point about Google. While Google has done an OK job at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bailey posted an insightful article the other day on his blog, Plagiarism Today, about why blog search services have failed. In the post he raises an interesting point about Google. While Google has done an OK job at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94299</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, that bug has been fixed. It appears to be a bug in the original theme itself so I will have to report it. For some reason the comment link was missing the permalink tag. Strange. Anyway, it&#039;s fixed now and should work. Only the third bug I found in the theme since I started with it so still VERY solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, that bug has been fixed. It appears to be a bug in the original theme itself so I will have to report it. For some reason the comment link was missing the permalink tag. Strange. Anyway, it&#8217;s fixed now and should work. Only the third bug I found in the theme since I started with it so still VERY solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-121572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-121572</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, that bug has been fixed. It appears to be a bug in the original theme itself so I will have to report it. For some reason the comment link was missing the permalink tag. Strange. Anyway, it&#039;s fixed now and should work. Only the third bug I found in the theme since I started with it so still VERY solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, that bug has been fixed. It appears to be a bug in the original theme itself so I will have to report it. For some reason the comment link was missing the permalink tag. Strange. Anyway, it&#8217;s fixed now and should work. Only the third bug I found in the theme since I started with it so still VERY solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94272</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I was just writing up a post for tomorrow about Google blog search and spam and went to grab the link for a comment above and noticed you got a bug. The comment links goto the root url for Plagiarism Today, not the current post. For example: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I was just writing up a post for tomorrow about Google blog search and spam and went to grab the link for a comment above and noticed you got a bug. The comment links goto the root url for Plagiarism Today, not the current post. For example: <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266" rel="nofollow">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-121571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-121571</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I was just writing up a post for tomorrow about Google blog search and spam and went to grab the link for a comment above and noticed you got a bug. The comment links goto the root url for Plagiarism Today, not the current post. For example: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266&quot;&gt;http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I was just writing up a post for tomorrow about Google blog search and spam and went to grab the link for a comment above and noticed you got a bug. The comment links goto the root url for Plagiarism Today, not the current post. For example: <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/#comment-94266</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94266</guid>
		<description>And THAT&#039;S where all my bug reports on Firefox have gone... 

Seriously, I think you&#039;re probably right on this one. Sad, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And THAT&#8217;S where all my bug reports on Firefox have gone&#8230; </p>
<p>Seriously, I think you&#8217;re probably right on this one. Sad, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-121570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-121570</guid>
		<description>And THAT&#039;S where all my bug reports on Firefox have gone... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, I think you&#039;re probably right on this one. Sad, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And THAT&#8217;S where all my bug reports on Firefox have gone&#8230; </p>
<p>Seriously, I think you&#8217;re probably right on this one. Sad, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94184</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t surprise me if it does nothing. I know many small (and even large) software companies delete many bug reports if it can&#039;t be easily fixed, wouldn&#039;t surprise me if google did that with most spam reports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if it does nothing. I know many small (and even large) software companies delete many bug reports if it can&#8217;t be easily fixed, wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if google did that with most spam reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-121569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-121569</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t surprise me if it does nothing. I know many small (and even large) software companies delete many bug reports if it can&#039;t be easily fixed, wouldn&#039;t surprise me if google did that with most spam reports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if it does nothing. I know many small (and even large) software companies delete many bug reports if it can&#8217;t be easily fixed, wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if google did that with most spam reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-94133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/07/why-blog-searching-fails/#comment-94133</guid>
		<description>It was embarrassing as heck to realize I&#039;d missed that but it is there. The strange thing is though that I&#039;m not convinced that spam report form really works that well either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was embarrassing as heck to realize I&#8217;d missed that but it is there. The strange thing is though that I&#8217;m not convinced that spam report form really works that well either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      19
Cached queries:     0
Total query time:   0.074
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2008' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='3' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='7' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'why-blog-searching-fails' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.063 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '839' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (839) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (839)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key = '_pprredirect_url'
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 13:55:20'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 13:16:41'
   12 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 13:16:41'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 04:35:36'
   14 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 04:35:36'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 02:53:11'
   16 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-12 02:53:11'
   17 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-11 21:17:03'
   18 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-11 21:17:03'
   19 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 839 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-03-11 14:15:20'
-->