<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spread of Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-112032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-112032</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-110674&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dr. Mike Wendell&lt;/a&gt; -
I&#039;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#039;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#039;ve never said that there is no spam on WordPress.com, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot. 

I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-110674" rel="nofollow">@Dr. Mike Wendell</a> -<br />
I&#8217;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#8217;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#8217;ve never said that there is no spam on WordPress.com, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot. </p>
<p>I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-121668</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-121668</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-110674&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dr. Mike Wendell&lt;/a&gt; -&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#039;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#039;ve never said that there is no spam on &lt;a href=&quot;http://WordPress.com&quot;&gt;WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt;, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-110674" rel="nofollow">@Dr. Mike Wendell</a> -<br />I&#8217;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#8217;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#8217;ve never said that there is no spam on <a href="http://WordPress.com">WordPress.com</a>, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot. </p>
<p>I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-133188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-133188</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-110674&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dr. Mike Wendell&lt;/a&gt; - 
I&#039;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#039;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#039;ve never said that there is no spam on WordPress.com, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot.  
 
I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-110674" rel="nofollow">@Dr. Mike Wendell</a> &#8211;<br />
I&#039;ve read and replied to your original post so I don&#039;t have much to say. However, those were the honest results of my test. I&#039;ve never said that there is no spam on WordPress.com, just that it is far lower than on other sites, such as Blogspot.  </p>
<p>I doubt that there is a way to run a free blogging service without having a spam problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mike Wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-121667</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-121667</guid>
		<description>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#039;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that &lt;a href=&quot;http://cj.com&quot;&gt;cj.com&lt;/a&gt; use, etc.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#039;re all still online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#8217;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that <a href="http://cj.com">cj.com</a> use, etc.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#8217;re all still online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mike Wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-133144</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-133144</guid>
		<description>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#039;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that cj.com use, etc.)I&#039;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#039;re all still online. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#039;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that cj.com use, etc.)I&#039;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#039;re all still online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mike Wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-110674</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-110674</guid>
		<description>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#039;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that cj.com use, etc.) 
 
I&#039;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#039;re all still online. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 1 questionable on wordpress.com?  That seems low to me.  I found just under 100 on Sunday in about an hour using Goolge&#039;s blogsearch and a few common terms typical of splogs.  (ie Make money fast, the domains that cj.com use, etc.)</p>
<p>I&#039;ve reported them but as of right now, they&#039;re all still online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-121666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-121666</guid>
		<description>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#039;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#039;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#039;s defaults, will go a long way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google Groups is insane. I&#039;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com&quot;&gt;groups.google.com&lt;/a&gt;. I haven&#039;t seen anything legitimate there in months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://co.mments.com&quot;&gt;co.mments.com&lt;/a&gt; myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#8217;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it.</p>
<p>There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#8217;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#8217;t see that happening any time soon. </p>
<p>But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#8217;s defaults, will go a long way.</p>
<p>Google Groups is insane. I&#8217;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from <a href="http://groups.google.com">groups.google.com</a>. I haven&#8217;t seen anything legitimate there in months.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use <a href="http://co.mments.com">co.mments.com</a> myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-93920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-93920</guid>
		<description>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#039;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it. 
 
There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#039;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon.  
 
But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#039;s defaults, will go a long way. 
 
Google Groups is insane. I&#039;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from groups.google.com. I haven&#039;t seen anything legitimate there in months. 
 
Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use co.mments.com myself... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#039;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it.</p>
<p>There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#039;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon. </p>
<p>But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#039;s defaults, will go a long way.</p>
<p>Google Groups is insane. I&#039;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from groups.google.com. I haven&#039;t seen anything legitimate there in months.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use co.mments.com myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-132740</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-132740</guid>
		<description>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#039;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it.There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#039;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon. But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#039;s defaults, will go a long way.Google Groups is insane. I&#039;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from groups.google.com. I haven&#039;t seen anything legitimate there in months.Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use co.mments.com myself... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyagerfan: To pass on some immortal advice from my father, just take the compliment and run, lets not argue numbers! I have no idea what is considered popular anymore. I&#039;m certain many readers of this site have blogs that are far more popular than it.There are a lot of things Google could to to make this problem easier, but at this point it&#039;s going to require a major shift in how Blogspot operates to have any major impact. I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon. But yes, a real domain name, a real WP/MovableType install and a good professional layout, rather than one of Blogger&#039;s defaults, will go a long way.Google Groups is insane. I&#039;ve hit a point that I just ignore anything from groups.google.com. I haven&#039;t seen anything legitimate there in months.Out of curiosity, which comment tracker were you using? I use co.mments.com myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyagerfan5761</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-93856</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyagerfan5761</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/03/04/the-spread-of-spam/#comment-93856</guid>
		<description>Spreading butter around is usually a good thing because it gives a more uniform taste to your toast. Spreading spam around just makes the world a more annoying place to Internet.  I am happy to be considered one of those &quot;few blogs that are hosted on Blogspot&quot; you consider legitimate. (Does 1,400 visits a month count as popular? I&#039;m not so sure...  But I appreciate the compliment. :-) )

If Google were to spend more time actively looking for splogs, or make it easier to flag a blog as spam (the navbar, with its button, is altogether too easy to hide), or even tighten the ToS so splogs are less legitimate under the rules of the hosting site... The world would probably be a better place for it.

All the more reason to get myself a real domain name, I guess.  If I do that, I can start putting other services on it as well; custom domains seem to be the latest trend in free amenities.

Google Groups does seem to have a large amount of spam going on, too.  It&#039;s gotten to the point of being ridiculous.

PS:
Yes, I know it&#039;s been days since the last comment, but the comment tracker I use has apparently been slacking on its checks lately... Grr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spreading butter around is usually a good thing because it gives a more uniform taste to your toast. Spreading spam around just makes the world a more annoying place to Internet.  I am happy to be considered one of those &#8220;few blogs that are hosted on Blogspot&#8221; you consider legitimate. (Does 1,400 visits a month count as popular? I&#8217;m not so sure&#8230;  But I appreciate the compliment. <img src='http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>If Google were to spend more time actively looking for splogs, or make it easier to flag a blog as spam (the navbar, with its button, is altogether too easy to hide), or even tighten the ToS so splogs are less legitimate under the rules of the hosting site&#8230; The world would probably be a better place for it.</p>
<p>All the more reason to get myself a real domain name, I guess.  If I do that, I can start putting other services on it as well; custom domains seem to be the latest trend in free amenities.</p>
<p>Google Groups does seem to have a large amount of spam going on, too.  It&#8217;s gotten to the point of being ridiculous.</p>
<p>PS:<br />
Yes, I know it&#8217;s been days since the last comment, but the comment tracker I use has apparently been slacking on its checks lately&#8230; Grr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/19 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 657/663 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-12 23:53:00 -->
