Comments on: Useful Site: Who Is Hosting This http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-131009 Anonymous Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:12:00 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-131009 Looks interesting! Thanks for letting us know about it.I really love your blog well done , congrats regards, <a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow">share picture online</a> Looks interesting!

Thanks for letting us know about it.I really love your blog well done , congrats

regards,

share picture online

]]> By: 5 Anti-Spam, Anti-Plagiarism Bookmarklets - PlagiarismToday http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-123423 5 Anti-Spam, Anti-Plagiarism Bookmarklets - PlagiarismToday Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:47 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-123423 [...] I previously covered WhoIsHostingThis earlier this year, I didn’t mention its very useful bookmarklet, which allows you to click the link on any page [...] [...] I previously covered WhoIsHostingThis earlier this year, I didn’t mention its very useful bookmarklet, which allows you to click the link on any page [...]

]]> By: Frustration and Fighting Plagiarism - PlagiarismToday http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-99641 Frustration and Fighting Plagiarism - PlagiarismToday Wed, 07 May 2008 16:05:31 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-99641 [...] Networking is Hard: Assuming one can navigate copyright law and locate an infringement they are prepared to act upon, finding out who to write can be difficult. Determining the host of the site is no easy task in many cases and, though new tools have come forward to help with that, the accuracy can leave something to be desired. [...] [...] Networking is Hard: Assuming one can navigate copyright law and locate an infringement they are prepared to act upon, finding out who to write can be difficult. Determining the host of the site is no easy task in many cases and, though new tools have come forward to help with that, the accuracy can leave something to be desired. [...]

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-91393 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:45:24 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-91393 Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted. Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data. Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference. Thank you very much for your comment! Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted.

Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data.

Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference.

Thank you very much for your comment!

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-132921 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:45:24 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-132921 Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted.Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data.Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference.Thank you very much for your comment! Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted.Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data.Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference.Thank you very much for your comment!

]]> By: Jonathan Bailey http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-122355 Jonathan Bailey Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:45:24 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-122355 Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted.Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data.Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference.Thank you very much for your comment! Redivide: It depends on what Whois you're talking about. IP whois is much different, and more useful in this case, than domain whois. The latter, however, is more common. It only tells you the name of the person who registered the domain, not where the site is hosted.Regarding your second statement, that is your opinion. But there is a vast difference to most between the remix and mashup culture than widespread verbatim copying. One shows a great deal of creativity and unique thought, the other shows none. Regarding the difference between Techorati and spam blogs, the difference is more in how they treat the content they use. Technorati, Google and so forth only display small portions and make their living off adding the service of sorting and organizing such data.Spam blogs, on the other hand, regurgitate entire works and make their living trying to trick the aforementioned search engines. One adds a service to the Web, the other does not. Once again, big difference.Thank you very much for your comment!

]]> By: redivide http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-122354 redivide Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:11:56 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-122354 I always used whois and I'm pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed!<br><br>Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and <a href="http://technorati.com">technorati.com</a>, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone. I always used whois and I’m pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed!

Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and technorati.com, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone.

]]> By: redivide http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-91269 redivide Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:11:56 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-91269 I always used whois and I'm pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed! Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and technorati.com, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone. I always used whois and I'm pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed!

Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and technorati.com, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone.

]]> By: redivide http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-132759 redivide Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:11:56 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-132759 I always used whois and I'm pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed!Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and technorati.com, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone. I always used whois and I'm pretty sure that site does too. No other tools needed!Plagiarism and content theft do not have the same meaning for me anymore. Mashups are everywhere and the diference between a splog running a RSS import script and technorati.com, for example, seems to me to be an issue of respectability alone.

]]> By: Jeremy Steele http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/comment-page-1/#comment-122353 Jeremy Steele Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:27:35 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/02/22/useful-site-who-is-hosting-this/#comment-122353 Ah OK, good to know it gets transferred on. Ah OK, good to know it gets transferred on.

]]>