<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Public Domain Trend</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Frank C. Tannehill</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-129363</link> <dc:creator>Frank C. Tannehill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-129363</guid> <description>I don&#039;t understand why these sites would do such a thing. They had copyright for their content for so long and now they&#039;re giving it all away. What&#039;s the trick? Is it a method to make their &lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.123-reg.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;domain&lt;/a&gt; more popular?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand why these sites would do such a thing. They had copyright for their content for so long and now they&#39;re giving it all away. What&#39;s the trick? Is it a method to make their <a
rel="follow" href="http://www.123-reg.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">domain</a> more popular?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Creative Commons Releases CCo: The Zero Copyright Public Domain License</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-125759</link> <dc:creator>Creative Commons Releases CCo: The Zero Copyright Public Domain License</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-125759</guid> <description>[...] The problem is that there hasn’t exactly been a rush to use the public domain dedication system and it hasn’t been the legal issues that has kept others at bay. Those that have used CC licenses have favored other licenses overwhelmingly and those that have wished to license their work in the public domain have usually just done so without the aid of CC. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem is that there hasn’t exactly been a rush to use the public domain dedication system and it hasn’t been the legal issues that has kept others at bay. Those that have used CC licenses have favored other licenses overwhelmingly and those that have wished to license their work in the public domain have usually just done so without the aid of CC. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CC0: Waiving Copyrights &#124; PlagiarismToday</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-124878</link> <dc:creator>CC0: Waiving Copyrights &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-124878</guid> <description>[...] The problem is that there hasn&#8217;t exactly been a rush to use the public domain dedication system and it hasn&#8217;t been the legal issues that has kept others at bay. Those that have used CC licenses have favored other licenses overwhelmingly and those that have wished to license their work in the public domain have usually just done so without the aid of CC. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem is that there hasn&#8217;t exactly been a rush to use the public domain dedication system and it hasn&#8217;t been the legal issues that has kept others at bay. Those that have used CC licenses have favored other licenses overwhelmingly and those that have wished to license their work in the public domain have usually just done so without the aid of CC. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-84101</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:30:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-84101</guid> <description>Trent: I owe you a deep apology. Defensio ate your comment and I was in my spam folder today cleaning out some things when I saw it. This is my fault for not checking that folder regularly.I know I&#039;m too late with this but I wanted to say that, while I understand the desire to help and remove as many restrictions as possible, I also do that here with PT, though not to the same degree, by allowing and even encouraging plagiarism, you open the door for scam artists to shams to build a false reputation on your work and use that reputation to defraud others. Your desire to help people might have put them in danger of being lied to and deceived.I don&#039;t see attribution as being that great of a requirement. There is no burden, that I see, when being asked to state where something is from. That knowledge enables readers to not only reward the original author, but research that person and perhaps discover even more works that can help them.Knowledge is power, I agree with that. But sometimes, to a reader, the knowledge of who wrote a work is as important as what is contained inside.That is just my experience, I still respect your decision and wish you the best of luck with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent: I owe you a deep apology. Defensio ate your comment and I was in my spam folder today cleaning out some things when I saw it. This is my fault for not checking that folder regularly.</p><p>I know I&#8217;m too late with this but I wanted to say that, while I understand the desire to help and remove as many restrictions as possible, I also do that here with PT, though not to the same degree, by allowing and even encouraging plagiarism, you open the door for scam artists to shams to build a false reputation on your work and use that reputation to defraud others. Your desire to help people might have put them in danger of being lied to and deceived.</p><p>I don&#8217;t see attribution as being that great of a requirement. There is no burden, that I see, when being asked to state where something is from. That knowledge enables readers to not only reward the original author, but research that person and perhaps discover even more works that can help them.</p><p>Knowledge is power, I agree with that. But sometimes, to a reader, the knowledge of who wrote a work is as important as what is contained inside.</p><p>That is just my experience, I still respect your decision and wish you the best of luck with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-120775</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-120775</guid> <description>Trent: I owe you a deep apology. Defensio ate your comment and I was in my spam folder today cleaning out some things when I saw it. This is my fault for not checking that folder regularly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know I&#039;m too late with this but I wanted to say that, while I understand the desire to help and remove as many restrictions as possible, I also do that here with PT, though not to the same degree, by allowing and even encouraging plagiarism, you open the door for scam artists to shams to build a false reputation on your work and use that reputation to defraud others. Your desire to help people might have put them in danger of being lied to and deceived.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t see attribution as being that great of a requirement. There is no burden, that I see, when being asked to state where something is from. That knowledge enables readers to not only reward the original author, but research that person and perhaps discover even more works that can help them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowledge is power, I agree with that. But sometimes, to a reader, the knowledge of who wrote a work is as important as what is contained inside. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is just my experience, I still respect your decision and wish you the best of luck with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent: I owe you a deep apology. Defensio ate your comment and I was in my spam folder today cleaning out some things when I saw it. This is my fault for not checking that folder regularly.</p><p>I know I&#8217;m too late with this but I wanted to say that, while I understand the desire to help and remove as many restrictions as possible, I also do that here with PT, though not to the same degree, by allowing and even encouraging plagiarism, you open the door for scam artists to shams to build a false reputation on your work and use that reputation to defraud others. Your desire to help people might have put them in danger of being lied to and deceived.</p><p>I don&#8217;t see attribution as being that great of a requirement. There is no burden, that I see, when being asked to state where something is from. That knowledge enables readers to not only reward the original author, but research that person and perhaps discover even more works that can help them.</p><p>Knowledge is power, I agree with that. But sometimes, to a reader, the knowledge of who wrote a work is as important as what is contained inside.</p><p>That is just my experience, I still respect your decision and wish you the best of luck with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-78936</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-78936</guid> <description>Jana: Though I have no doubt that there is room for improvement with Zen Habits, as with everything else in the world,in my experience it has been that people do as little as possible when using other people&#039;s work. Will some work to rewrite and improve the text? Probably as it is a novelty at the moment.However, most people who copy the work will have no interest in improving the work or doing any work of their own. I&#039;ve allowed derivatives of PT articles for as long as I can remember right now but nearly all reused copies, legit or otherwise, are verbatim.Though there is a lot of talk about mashups and remixing, it seems few people are actually doing it, especially with text. Most copying is verbatim and much of it is plagiarized.Perhaps I don&#039;t share their faith in humanity, but I&#039;ve seen too much evidence to the contrary.Thank you for the addition! I greatly appreciate the comment!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jana: Though I have no doubt that there is room for improvement with Zen Habits, as with everything else in the world,</p><p>in my experience it has been that people do as little as possible when using other people&#8217;s work. Will some work to rewrite and improve the text? Probably as it is a novelty at the moment.</p><p>However, most people who copy the work will have no interest in improving the work or doing any work of their own. I&#8217;ve allowed derivatives of PT articles for as long as I can remember right now but nearly all reused copies, legit or otherwise, are verbatim.</p><p>Though there is a lot of talk about mashups and remixing, it seems few people are actually doing it, especially with text. Most copying is verbatim and much of it is plagiarized.</p><p>Perhaps I don&#8217;t share their faith in humanity, but I&#8217;ve seen too much evidence to the contrary.</p><p>Thank you for the addition! I greatly appreciate the comment!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-120774</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-120774</guid> <description>Jana: Though I have no doubt that there is room for improvement with Zen Habits, as with everything else in the world, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;in my experience it has been that people do as little as possible when using other people&#039;s work. Will some work to rewrite and improve the text? Probably as it is a novelty at the moment. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, most people who copy the work will have no interest in improving the work or doing any work of their own. I&#039;ve allowed derivatives of PT articles for as long as I can remember right now but nearly all reused copies, legit or otherwise, are verbatim.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though there is a lot of talk about mashups and remixing, it seems few people are actually doing it, especially with text. Most copying is verbatim and much of it is plagiarized. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps I don&#039;t share their faith in humanity, but I&#039;ve seen too much evidence to the contrary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for the addition! I greatly appreciate the comment!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jana: Though I have no doubt that there is room for improvement with Zen Habits, as with everything else in the world,</p><p>in my experience it has been that people do as little as possible when using other people&#8217;s work. Will some work to rewrite and improve the text? Probably as it is a novelty at the moment.</p><p>However, most people who copy the work will have no interest in improving the work or doing any work of their own. I&#8217;ve allowed derivatives of PT articles for as long as I can remember right now but nearly all reused copies, legit or otherwise, are verbatim.</p><p>Though there is a lot of talk about mashups and remixing, it seems few people are actually doing it, especially with text. Most copying is verbatim and much of it is plagiarized.</p><p>Perhaps I don&#8217;t share their faith in humanity, but I&#8217;ve seen too much evidence to the contrary.</p><p>Thank you for the addition! I greatly appreciate the comment!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jana</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-78249</link> <dc:creator>jana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-78249</guid> <description>only one minor observation, re &quot;The same as trademark protection helps consumers be sure they received a genuine product, copyright protection helps them ensure they have the genuine author and are getting the best experience possible.&quot; - but they seem to think that actually altering their articles might be a good thing, ie that somebody might use them as part of something better than they could be able to write. i have no idea whatsoever if that will happen, just wanted to add it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only one minor observation, re &#8220;The same as trademark protection helps consumers be sure they received a genuine product, copyright protection helps them ensure they have the genuine author and are getting the best experience possible.&#8221; &#8211; but they seem to think that actually altering their articles might be a good thing, ie that somebody might use them as part of something better than they could be able to write. i have no idea whatsoever if that will happen, just wanted to add it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jana</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-120773</link> <dc:creator>jana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-120773</guid> <description>only one minor observation, re &quot;The same as trademark protection helps consumers be sure they received a genuine product, copyright protection helps them ensure they have the genuine author and are getting the best experience possible.&quot; - but they seem to think that actually altering their articles might be a good thing, ie that somebody might use them as part of something better than they could be able to write. i have no idea whatsoever if that will happen, just wanted to add it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only one minor observation, re &#8220;The same as trademark protection helps consumers be sure they received a genuine product, copyright protection helps them ensure they have the genuine author and are getting the best experience possible.&#8221; &#8211; but they seem to think that actually altering their articles might be a good thing, ie that somebody might use them as part of something better than they could be able to write. i have no idea whatsoever if that will happen, just wanted to add it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/comment-page-1/#comment-77422</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:08:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2008/01/09/the-public-domain-trend/#comment-77422</guid> <description>RS: With your first observation, clearly the editor of the site and author of the work would be the one responsible for pushing it through. It is their rights and if they intend to never enforce them then it is completely safe for others to infringe them at will.The point though isn&#039;t so much to say that there is a danger in using the content as it is to show that the dedication to the public domain is not and can not be complete. It also means that they have an &quot;out&quot; in case they change their mind.As far as your second observation goes, I don&#039;t think that is the sentiment. Reading the articles they truly believe that they are doing what is in the best interest of their readers. I feel that they are mistaken and have some experience with that, but I believe that is the angle they are coming from.Then again, I could be wrong and they could be hiding their true motives, I have no way of knowing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RS: With your first observation, clearly the editor of the site and author of the work would be the one responsible for pushing it through. It is their rights and if they intend to never enforce them then it is completely safe for others to infringe them at will.</p><p>The point though isn&#8217;t so much to say that there is a danger in using the content as it is to show that the dedication to the public domain is not and can not be complete. It also means that they have an &#8220;out&#8221; in case they change their mind.</p><p>As far as your second observation goes, I don&#8217;t think that is the sentiment. Reading the articles they truly believe that they are doing what is in the best interest of their readers. I feel that they are mistaken and have some experience with that, but I believe that is the angle they are coming from.</p><p>Then again, I could be wrong and they could be hiding their true motives, I have no way of knowing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/19 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-21 23:03:53 -->