<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: RSS in the Mainstream Media</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Freelance Writing Jobs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekend Link Love for December 8th, 2007</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70654</link> <dc:creator>Freelance Writing Jobs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekend Link Love for December 8th, 2007</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70654</guid> <description>[...] RSS in the Mainstream Media at Plagiarism Today. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RSS in the Mainstream Media at Plagiarism Today. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70630</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70630</guid> <description>Murali: I am not sure what I would do with RSS readers. I&#039;m more interested in the content distribution end and not the reading end. How you choose to read the feed is up to you!RS: I have to say that it was the changes at the NYT that motivated me, in part, to do this study. I realized that there were some big changes going on and I couldn&#039;t simply write off MSM any more. I&#039;m glad I did it, I learned a lot!Speaking of which, the BBC is weird. But at least they are working on it.I&#039;m not sure if it was NIH syndrome that stung them so much as just the dinosaur nature of these monolithic companies. They adapt slowly to any new tech, even if they did invent it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murali: I am not sure what I would do with RSS readers. I&#8217;m more interested in the content distribution end and not the reading end. How you choose to read the feed is up to you!</p><p>RS: I have to say that it was the changes at the NYT that motivated me, in part, to do this study. I realized that there were some big changes going on and I couldn&#8217;t simply write off MSM any more. I&#8217;m glad I did it, I learned a lot!</p><p>Speaking of which, the BBC is weird. But at least they are working on it.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure if it was NIH syndrome that stung them so much as just the dinosaur nature of these monolithic companies. They adapt slowly to any new tech, even if they did invent it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-122338</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:38:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-122338</guid> <description>Murali: I am not sure what I would do with RSS readers. I&#039;m more interested in the content distribution end and not the reading end. How you choose to read the feed is up to you!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RS: I have to say that it was the changes at the NYT that motivated me, in part, to do this study. I realized that there were some big changes going on and I couldn&#039;t simply write off MSM any more. I&#039;m glad I did it, I learned a lot!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speaking of which, the BBC is weird. But at least they are working on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not sure if it was NIH syndrome that stung them so much as just the dinosaur nature of these monolithic companies. They adapt slowly to any new tech, even if they did invent it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murali: I am not sure what I would do with RSS readers. I&#8217;m more interested in the content distribution end and not the reading end. How you choose to read the feed is up to you!</p><p>RS: I have to say that it was the changes at the NYT that motivated me, in part, to do this study. I realized that there were some big changes going on and I couldn&#8217;t simply write off MSM any more. I&#8217;m glad I did it, I learned a lot!</p><p>Speaking of which, the BBC is weird. But at least they are working on it.</p><p>I&#8217;m not sure if it was NIH syndrome that stung them so much as just the dinosaur nature of these monolithic companies. They adapt slowly to any new tech, even if they did invent it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Recording Studio</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70605</link> <dc:creator>Recording Studio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70605</guid> <description>I get NYT news summary and if you click to read the full story on any of the titles, you will see advertisements on the pages displayed.NYT even went one step further.  To read their OP-ED articles, till a few weeks ago you had to pay and be a subscriber.  They have done away with that requirement now and those pages are also readable.BBC is a public sector operation with some peculiar approach to their business.Your conclusion that the mainstream media are waking up and we can expect a lot more from them however, is very valid.  They are just getting over their NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrom.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get NYT news summary and if you click to read the full story on any of the titles, you will see advertisements on the pages displayed.</p><p>NYT even went one step further.  To read their OP-ED articles, till a few weeks ago you had to pay and be a subscriber.  They have done away with that requirement now and those pages are also readable.</p><p>BBC is a public sector operation with some peculiar approach to their business.</p><p>Your conclusion that the mainstream media are waking up and we can expect a lot more from them however, is very valid.  They are just getting over their NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrom.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Recording Studio</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-122337</link> <dc:creator>Recording Studio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:26:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-122337</guid> <description>I get NYT news summary and if you click to read the full story on any of the titles, you will see advertisements on the pages displayed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NYT even went one step further.  To read their OP-ED articles, till a few weeks ago you had to pay and be a subscriber.  They have done away with that requirement now and those pages are also readable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BBC is a public sector operation with some peculiar approach to their business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your conclusion that the mainstream media are waking up and we can expect a lot more from them however, is very valid.  They are just getting over their NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrom.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get NYT news summary and if you click to read the full story on any of the titles, you will see advertisements on the pages displayed.</p><p>NYT even went one step further.  To read their OP-ED articles, till a few weeks ago you had to pay and be a subscriber.  They have done away with that requirement now and those pages are also readable.</p><p>BBC is a public sector operation with some peculiar approach to their business.</p><p>Your conclusion that the mainstream media are waking up and we can expect a lot more from them however, is very valid.  They are just getting over their NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrom.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Murali</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70595</link> <dc:creator>Murali</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70595</guid> <description>Good compilation. Can I expect a post on RSS readers too with your ranking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good compilation. Can I expect a post on RSS readers too with your ranking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Murali</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-122336</link> <dc:creator>Murali</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-122336</guid> <description>Good compilation. Can I expect a post on RSS readers too with your ranking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good compilation. Can I expect a post on RSS readers too with your ranking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70580</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70580</guid> <description>Jake: That kind of brings me to a point I totally forgot in my analysis, that none of the feeds were monetized in any way. There was no advertising, no paid content, nothing. It was completely free. I suspect that they won&#039;t give away their content for free and, until they can find a way to effective monetize RSS feeds, I guess we&#039;ll be seeing partial feeds too.But I do know what you mean, I had planned on subscribing to it as well..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake: That kind of brings me to a point I totally forgot in my analysis, that none of the feeds were monetized in any way. There was no advertising, no paid content, nothing. It was completely free. I suspect that they won&#8217;t give away their content for free and, until they can find a way to effective monetize RSS feeds, I guess we&#8217;ll be seeing partial feeds too.</p><p>But I do know what you mean, I had planned on subscribing to it as well..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-122335</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-122335</guid> <description>Jake: That kind of brings me to a point I totally forgot in my analysis, that none of the feeds were monetized in any way. There was no advertising, no paid content, nothing. It was completely free. I suspect that they won&#039;t give away their content for free and, until they can find a way to effective monetize RSS feeds, I guess we&#039;ll be seeing partial feeds too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I do know what you mean, I had planned on subscribing to it as well..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake: That kind of brings me to a point I totally forgot in my analysis, that none of the feeds were monetized in any way. There was no advertising, no paid content, nothing. It was completely free. I suspect that they won&#8217;t give away their content for free and, until they can find a way to effective monetize RSS feeds, I guess we&#8217;ll be seeing partial feeds too.</p><p>But I do know what you mean, I had planned on subscribing to it as well..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jake</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-70574</link> <dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:58:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/12/06/rss-in-the-mainstream-media/#comment-70574</guid> <description>The first time I read this article, I was scanning and looking for the one that had full feeds. I was going to go subscribe to it for sure. It&#039;s somewhat annoying that none of these do... why is it that mainstream media has to be so dang scared of full feeds? Partial feeds just aren&#039;t very productive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I read this article, I was scanning and looking for the one that had full feeds. I was going to go subscribe to it for sure. It&#8217;s somewhat annoying that none of these do&#8230; why is it that mainstream media has to be so dang scared of full feeds? Partial feeds just aren&#8217;t very productive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-20 06:32:14 -->