<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Shell Games</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Housekeeping: New Contact Form and MyBlogLog</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-69502</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Housekeeping: New Contact Form and MyBlogLog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-69502</guid> <description>[...] Let me know what you think of that feature. You can test it on any post with a decent amount of comments. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let me know what you think of that feature. You can test it on any post with a decent amount of comments. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weekend Roundup #11 &#187; Blogging News and Reviews // JaypeeOnline</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-68010</link> <dc:creator>Weekend Roundup #11 &#187; Blogging News and Reviews // JaypeeOnline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:28:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-68010</guid> <description>[...] Today has a very interesting article entitled - &#8220;Google&#8217;s Shell Games&#8220;. It talks about Google&#8217;s DMCA policy and the issues involved in filing a DMCA notice [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today has a very interesting article entitled &#8211; &#8220;Google&#8217;s Shell Games&#8220;. It talks about Google&#8217;s DMCA policy and the issues involved in filing a DMCA notice [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-67970</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-67970</guid> <description>Recliners: I think there is indeed a very strong sentiment against Google right now. One of the big problems though is the lack of a better competitor. Microsoft is viewed as being even worse, Yahoo! doesn&#039;t seem to return accurate results on may queries and Mahalo is years away from being viable.Who wants to found a new search engine?Maria: I&#039;ve noticed similar issues with FeedBurner since the transition as well. I used to promote them openly on this site but I have not done so since the transition. I&#039;ve been debating leaving them but know that would likely cost me many of my readers.The answer to your second question is that Google is paranoid, wanting to stop everyone from making money from them that isn&#039;t paying their cut. That is sure how it seems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recliners: I think there is indeed a very strong sentiment against Google right now. One of the big problems though is the lack of a better competitor. Microsoft is viewed as being even worse, Yahoo! doesn&#8217;t seem to return accurate results on may queries and Mahalo is years away from being viable.</p><p>Who wants to found a new search engine?</p><p>Maria: I&#8217;ve noticed similar issues with FeedBurner since the transition as well. I used to promote them openly on this site but I have not done so since the transition. I&#8217;ve been debating leaving them but know that would likely cost me many of my readers.</p><p>The answer to your second question is that Google is paranoid, wanting to stop everyone from making money from them that isn&#8217;t paying their cut. That is sure how it seems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-122608</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-122608</guid> <description>Recliners: I think there is indeed a very strong sentiment against Google right now. One of the big problems though is the lack of a better competitor. Microsoft is viewed as being even worse, Yahoo! doesn&#039;t seem to return accurate results on may queries and Mahalo is years away from being viable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who wants to found a new search engine?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maria: I&#039;ve noticed similar issues with FeedBurner since the transition as well. I used to promote them openly on this site but I have not done so since the transition. I&#039;ve been debating leaving them but know that would likely cost me many of my readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The answer to your second question is that Google is paranoid, wanting to stop everyone from making money from them that isn&#039;t paying their cut. That is sure how it seems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recliners: I think there is indeed a very strong sentiment against Google right now. One of the big problems though is the lack of a better competitor. Microsoft is viewed as being even worse, Yahoo! doesn&#8217;t seem to return accurate results on may queries and Mahalo is years away from being viable.</p><p>Who wants to found a new search engine?</p><p>Maria: I&#8217;ve noticed similar issues with FeedBurner since the transition as well. I used to promote them openly on this site but I have not done so since the transition. I&#8217;ve been debating leaving them but know that would likely cost me many of my readers.</p><p>The answer to your second question is that Google is paranoid, wanting to stop everyone from making money from them that isn&#8217;t paying their cut. That is sure how it seems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maria</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-67950</link> <dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:33:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-67950</guid> <description>A little side note here...I recently visited the support forums for FeedBurner, which was purchased by Google within the past year or so. In the old days, the forums were full of helpful information. Today, the response to someone else with the same problem I have was basically, this is a .htaccess problem, not a FeedBurner problem. We won&#039;t help.A similar (but not exactly the same) problem involving .htaccess for FeedBurner redirects had been tackled throughly by the FeedBurner staff in 2005, before the company was swallowed by Google.What do I read from this? Once Google takes over a company, support is optional.And I&#039;m sure everyone is aware of how Google allegedly dropped the Page Rank of Pay Per Post bloggers to 0? While I don&#039;t agree with Pay Per Post blogging, I&#039;m also wondering why Google is so anxious to go after PPP bloggers but not the sploggers who are infringing copyrights -- BREAKING THE LAW -- every day.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little side note here&#8230;</p><p>I recently visited the support forums for FeedBurner, which was purchased by Google within the past year or so. In the old days, the forums were full of helpful information. Today, the response to someone else with the same problem I have was basically, this is a .htaccess problem, not a FeedBurner problem. We won&#8217;t help.</p><p>A similar (but not exactly the same) problem involving .htaccess for FeedBurner redirects had been tackled throughly by the FeedBurner staff in 2005, before the company was swallowed by Google.</p><p>What do I read from this? Once Google takes over a company, support is optional.</p><p>And I&#8217;m sure everyone is aware of how Google allegedly dropped the Page Rank of Pay Per Post bloggers to 0? While I don&#8217;t agree with Pay Per Post blogging, I&#8217;m also wondering why Google is so anxious to go after PPP bloggers but not the sploggers who are infringing copyrights &#8212; BREAKING THE LAW &#8212; every day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maria</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-122607</link> <dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-122607</guid> <description>A little side note here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recently visited the support forums for FeedBurner, which was purchased by Google within the past year or so. In the old days, the forums were full of helpful information. Today, the response to someone else with the same problem I have was basically, this is a .htaccess problem, not a FeedBurner problem. We won&#039;t help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A similar (but not exactly the same) problem involving .htaccess for FeedBurner redirects had been tackled throughly by the FeedBurner staff in 2005, before the company was swallowed by Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do I read from this? Once Google takes over a company, support is optional.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I&#039;m sure everyone is aware of how Google allegedly dropped the Page Rank of Pay Per Post bloggers to 0? While I don&#039;t agree with Pay Per Post blogging, I&#039;m also wondering why Google is so anxious to go after PPP bloggers but not the sploggers who are infringing copyrights -- BREAKING THE LAW -- every day.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little side note here&#8230;</p><p>I recently visited the support forums for FeedBurner, which was purchased by Google within the past year or so. In the old days, the forums were full of helpful information. Today, the response to someone else with the same problem I have was basically, this is a .htaccess problem, not a FeedBurner problem. We won&#8217;t help.</p><p>A similar (but not exactly the same) problem involving .htaccess for FeedBurner redirects had been tackled throughly by the FeedBurner staff in 2005, before the company was swallowed by Google.</p><p>What do I read from this? Once Google takes over a company, support is optional.</p><p>And I&#8217;m sure everyone is aware of how Google allegedly dropped the Page Rank of Pay Per Post bloggers to 0? While I don&#8217;t agree with Pay Per Post blogging, I&#8217;m also wondering why Google is so anxious to go after PPP bloggers but not the sploggers who are infringing copyrights &#8212; BREAKING THE LAW &#8212; every day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Recliners</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-67906</link> <dc:creator>Recliners</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-67906</guid> <description>Seems to me that Google is way too bothered with their bottom line and only their bottom line right now! They are being all big brother with bloggers banning paid links and coming down on text link ads, while at the same time not much bothered with the very people they should be working toward protecting. Methinks there is a very strong bugged-with-Google sentiment all across the internet right now. NETIZENS OF THE WORLD UNITE??!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Google is way too bothered with their bottom line and only their bottom line right now! They are being all big brother with bloggers banning paid links and coming down on text link ads, while at the same time not much bothered with the very people they should be working toward protecting. Methinks there is a very strong bugged-with-Google sentiment all across the internet right now. NETIZENS OF THE WORLD UNITE??!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Recliners</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-122606</link> <dc:creator>Recliners</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-122606</guid> <description>Seems to me that Google is way too bothered with their bottom line and only their bottom line right now! They are being all big brother with bloggers banning paid links and coming down on text link ads, while at the same time not much bothered with the very people they should be working toward protecting. Methinks there is a very strong bugged-with-Google sentiment all across the internet right now. NETIZENS OF THE WORLD UNITE??!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Google is way too bothered with their bottom line and only their bottom line right now! They are being all big brother with bloggers banning paid links and coming down on text link ads, while at the same time not much bothered with the very people they should be working toward protecting. Methinks there is a very strong bugged-with-Google sentiment all across the internet right now. NETIZENS OF THE WORLD UNITE??!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-67863</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-67863</guid> <description>Andy: Thank you for the compliments and for the add! Greatly appreciated! I didn&#039;t talk about how U.S.-centric their Adsense policy is and I probably should have. Sending a fax or a postal mail is bad enough if you live in the country, it&#039;d be ten time worse if you lived across an ocean.There is a workaround and a way to send an email using a PDF with a scanned signature, but it is a pain to say the least. That, and I don&#039;t know the email for Adsense, just for Google and Blogspot.Still, one could try the other account amac at google dot com.RS: As true as that is, one thing I&#039;ve learned from watching the financial markets is that it is all quarter to quarter. When a company is in a growth cycle like Google, they tend to obsess over keeping the growth going and making next quarter&#039;s results better than the last.That leads to some stupid decisions if one asks me.I&#039;m sure if Google did what was actually in the shareholder&#039;s best interest, the shareholders would bail on them as the stocks slid in the short run.People are fickle that way.Thanks for the compliments!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: Thank you for the compliments and for the add! Greatly appreciated! I didn&#8217;t talk about how U.S.-centric their Adsense policy is and I probably should have. Sending a fax or a postal mail is bad enough if you live in the country, it&#8217;d be ten time worse if you lived across an ocean.</p><p>There is a workaround and a way to send an email using a PDF with a scanned signature, but it is a pain to say the least. That, and I don&#8217;t know the email for Adsense, just for Google and Blogspot.</p><p>Still, one could try the other account amac at google dot com.</p><p>RS: As true as that is, one thing I&#8217;ve learned from watching the financial markets is that it is all quarter to quarter. When a company is in a growth cycle like Google, they tend to obsess over keeping the growth going and making next quarter&#8217;s results better than the last.</p><p>That leads to some stupid decisions if one asks me.</p><p>I&#8217;m sure if Google did what was actually in the shareholder&#8217;s best interest, the shareholders would bail on them as the stocks slid in the short run.</p><p>People are fickle that way.</p><p>Thanks for the compliments!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/comment-page-1/#comment-122605</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/11/16/googles-shell-games/#comment-122605</guid> <description>Andy: Thank you for the compliments and for the add! Greatly appreciated! I didn&#039;t talk about how U.S.-centric their Adsense policy is and I probably should have. Sending a fax or a postal mail is bad enough if you live in the country, it&#039;d be ten time worse if you lived across an ocean.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a workaround and a way to send an email using a PDF with a scanned signature, but it is a pain to say the least. That, and I don&#039;t know the email for Adsense, just for Google and Blogspot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, one could try the other account amac at google dot com.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RS: As true as that is, one thing I&#039;ve learned from watching the financial markets is that it is all quarter to quarter. When a company is in a growth cycle like Google, they tend to obsess over keeping the growth going and making next quarter&#039;s results better than the last.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That leads to some stupid decisions if one asks me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure if Google did what was actually in the shareholder&#039;s best interest, the shareholders would bail on them as the stocks slid in the short run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are fickle that way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the compliments!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy: Thank you for the compliments and for the add! Greatly appreciated! I didn&#8217;t talk about how U.S.-centric their Adsense policy is and I probably should have. Sending a fax or a postal mail is bad enough if you live in the country, it&#8217;d be ten time worse if you lived across an ocean.</p><p>There is a workaround and a way to send an email using a PDF with a scanned signature, but it is a pain to say the least. That, and I don&#8217;t know the email for Adsense, just for Google and Blogspot.</p><p>Still, one could try the other account amac at google dot com.</p><p>RS: As true as that is, one thing I&#8217;ve learned from watching the financial markets is that it is all quarter to quarter. When a company is in a growth cycle like Google, they tend to obsess over keeping the growth going and making next quarter&#8217;s results better than the last.</p><p>That leads to some stupid decisions if one asks me.</p><p>I&#8217;m sure if Google did what was actually in the shareholder&#8217;s best interest, the shareholders would bail on them as the stocks slid in the short run.</p><p>People are fickle that way.</p><p>Thanks for the compliments!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-17 19:49:38 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      19
Cached queries:     2
Total query time:   0.019
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |    0.002 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2007' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='11' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='16' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'googles-shell-games' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '729' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (729) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (729)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-23 18:24:44'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-19 06:28:49'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 19:45:25'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 18:45:25'
   14 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 15:33:03'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 14:33:03'
   16 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 03:48:50'
   17 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-18 02:48:50'
   18 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-17 16:57:56'
   19 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 729 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-11-17 15:57:56'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_160efefba350a5d19ec1db64a9c697cb
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.557s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 GMT
ETag:               "c2f9cd86c24cda3b43d77e39b7d48669"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->