Comments on: Copyright 2.0 Show – Episode 29 – Usenet Sued http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:03:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Reclinershttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-66156 Recliners Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:48:54 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-66156 Makes things clearer, thanks. Makes things clearer, thanks.

]]> By: Reclinershttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-122750 Recliners Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:48:54 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-122750 Makes things clearer, thanks. Makes things clearer, thanks.

]]> By: JBhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-66089 JB Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:16:35 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-66089 Recliners: The idea is that since Usenet hosted some of the groups, they could use the technology on their servers to prevent the files from being uploaded to begin with or to take them down before they get downloaded.This is similar to what YouTube is doing now.Hope that explains it! Recliners: The idea is that since Usenet hosted some of the groups, they could use the technology on their servers to prevent the files from being uploaded to begin with or to take them down before they get downloaded.

This is similar to what YouTube is doing now.

Hope that explains it!

]]> By: JBhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-122749 JB Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:16:35 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-122749 Recliners: The idea is that since Usenet hosted some of the groups, they could use the technology on their servers to prevent the files from being uploaded to begin with or to take them down before they get downloaded.<br><br>This is similar to what YouTube is doing now. <br><br>Hope that explains it! Recliners: The idea is that since Usenet hosted some of the groups, they could use the technology on their servers to prevent the files from being uploaded to begin with or to take them down before they get downloaded.

This is similar to what YouTube is doing now.

Hope that explains it!

]]> By: Reclinershttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-65966 Recliners Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:08:03 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-65966 Fingerprint technology for Facebook? Is that even possible? Wouldn't your PC have to be enabled with the appropriate hardware or software or whatever is required? Fingerprint technology for Facebook? Is that even possible? Wouldn’t your PC have to be enabled with the appropriate hardware or software or whatever is required?

]]> By: Reclinershttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-122748 Recliners Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:08:03 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-122748 Fingerprint technology for Facebook? Is that even possible? Wouldn't your PC have to be enabled with the appropriate hardware or software or whatever is required? Fingerprint technology for Facebook? Is that even possible? Wouldn’t your PC have to be enabled with the appropriate hardware or software or whatever is required?

]]> By: JBhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-65867 JB Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:42:50 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-65867 Jeremy: You and me both. I really though Usenet was just a realm for Uber nerds and old guys who remember the "good old days" of the Web. Looks like I was wrong.Mr. J: I haven't heard of this taking place. In fact, YouTube has been pretty clear that their technology doesn't have such capability. According to them, they can't even use it to distinguish between porn and other types of content or detect copyrighted material that has not been submitted. It seems unlikely that they have the capability to read faces.I could be wrong though, have you seen an article on that? Jeremy: You and me both. I really though Usenet was just a realm for Uber nerds and old guys who remember the “good old days” of the Web. Looks like I was wrong.

Mr. J: I haven’t heard of this taking place. In fact, YouTube has been pretty clear that their technology doesn’t have such capability. According to them, they can’t even use it to distinguish between porn and other types of content or detect copyrighted material that has not been submitted. It seems unlikely that they have the capability to read faces.

I could be wrong though, have you seen an article on that?

]]> By: JBhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-122747 JB Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:42:50 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-122747 Jeremy: You and me both. I really though Usenet was just a realm for Uber nerds and old guys who remember the "good old days" of the Web. Looks like I was wrong.<br><br>Mr. J: I haven't heard of this taking place. In fact, YouTube has been pretty clear that their technology doesn't have such capability. According to them, they can't even use it to distinguish between porn and other types of content or detect copyrighted material that has not been submitted. It seems unlikely that they have the capability to read faces.<br><br>I could be wrong though, have you seen an article on that? Jeremy: You and me both. I really though Usenet was just a realm for Uber nerds and old guys who remember the “good old days” of the Web. Looks like I was wrong.

Mr. J: I haven’t heard of this taking place. In fact, YouTube has been pretty clear that their technology doesn’t have such capability. According to them, they can’t even use it to distinguish between porn and other types of content or detect copyrighted material that has not been submitted. It seems unlikely that they have the capability to read faces.

I could be wrong though, have you seen an article on that?

]]> By: Mr. Jhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-65859 Mr. J Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:30:11 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-65859 I've heard that websites such as Youtube and Myspace are using fingerprint technology or something similar to confirm people's identities, and maybe even keep the information on record. Isn't that an invasion of privacy? I’ve heard that websites such as Youtube and Myspace are using fingerprint technology or something similar to confirm people’s identities, and maybe even keep the information on record. Isn’t that an invasion of privacy?

]]> By: Mr. Jhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/comment-page-1/#comment-122746 Mr. J Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:30:11 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/22/copyright-20-show-episode-29-usenet-sued/#comment-122746 I've heard that websites such as Youtube and Myspace are using fingerprint technology or something similar to confirm people's identities, and maybe even keep the information on record. Isn't that an invasion of privacy? I’ve heard that websites such as Youtube and Myspace are using fingerprint technology or something similar to confirm people’s identities, and maybe even keep the information on record. Isn’t that an invasion of privacy?

]]>