Comments on: Picking a Dead Man’s Pocket http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: JB http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/comment-page-1/#comment-61932 JB Sun, 22 Jul 2007 03:19:55 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/#comment-61932 Will, There are some advantages to being on an archive site. If you don't use a non-repudiation service such as Numly or Registered Commons, an archive site can provide some verification of copyright ownership by proving that the work was up on your site at a time before the infringer started using it. Other than that, there is little practical reason to be included in such a site, especially if you plan to remove your site from it before closure. The decision, as I see it, is really up to the Webmaster... Hope that helps! Will,

There are some advantages to being on an archive site. If you don’t use a non-repudiation service such as Numly or Registered Commons, an archive site can provide some verification of copyright ownership by proving that the work was up on your site at a time before the infringer started using it.

Other than that, there is little practical reason to be included in such a site, especially if you plan to remove your site from it before closure.

The decision, as I see it, is really up to the Webmaster…

Hope that helps!

]]> By: JB http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/comment-page-1/#comment-122744 JB Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:19:55 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/#comment-122744 Will,There are some advantages to being on an archive site. If you don't use a non-repudiation service such as Numly or Registered Commons, an archive site can provide some verification of copyright ownership by proving that the work was up on your site at a time before the infringer started using it.Other than that, there is little practical reason to be included in such a site, especially if you plan to remove your site from it before closure.The decision, as I see it, is really up to the Webmaster...Hope that helps! Will,There are some advantages to being on an archive site. If you don't use a non-repudiation service such as Numly or Registered Commons, an archive site can provide some verification of copyright ownership by proving that the work was up on your site at a time before the infringer started using it.Other than that, there is little practical reason to be included in such a site, especially if you plan to remove your site from it before closure.The decision, as I see it, is really up to the Webmaster…Hope that helps!

]]> By: Will http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/comment-page-1/#comment-61894 Will Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:26:59 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/#comment-61894 Hi Jonathan! About #2 in prevention, "Block known archiving sites". It got me wondering what possible advantage there could be for any of our sites to be included on an archiving site, ever? Are you recommending step #2 only for dead sites? Or do you do it on current sites also? Thanks -Will Hi Jonathan! About #2 in prevention, “Block known archiving sites”. It got me wondering what possible advantage there could be for any of our sites to be included on an archiving site, ever? Are you recommending step #2 only for dead sites? Or do you do it on current sites also?

Thanks -Will

]]> By: Will http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/comment-page-1/#comment-122743 Will Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:26:59 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/07/19/picking-a-dead-mans-pocket/#comment-122743 Hi Jonathan! About #2 in prevention, "Block known archiving sites". It got me wondering what possible advantage there could be for any of our sites to be included on an archiving site, ever? Are you recommending step #2 only for dead sites? Or do you do it on current sites also? Thanks -Will Hi Jonathan! About #2 in prevention, "Block known archiving sites". It got me wondering what possible advantage there could be for any of our sites to be included on an archiving site, ever? Are you recommending step #2 only for dead sites? Or do you do it on current sites also? Thanks -Will

]]>