http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:31:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-62687 Scott Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:29:44 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-62687 Maybe to compare to the paid links. If a non-paid link is getting a lot of clicks maybe it can be brought to the administrator's attention and converted to a paid link. Maybe to compare to the paid links. If a non-paid link is getting a lot of clicks maybe it can be brought to the administrator’s attention and converted to a paid link.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-121867 Scott Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:29:44 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-121867 Maybe to compare to the paid links. If a non-paid link is getting a lot of clicks maybe it can be brought to the administrator's attention and converted to a paid link. Maybe to compare to the paid links. If a non-paid link is getting a lot of clicks maybe it can be brought to the administrator’s attention and converted to a paid link.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-62685 JB Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:58:02 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-62685 I guess what I don't understand is why one would need to track a mere credit link. I understand the need for tracking ads and any referral links, but just a regular link, what purpose would detailed tracking serve beyond what you can get through javascript. I guess what I don’t understand is why one would need to track a mere credit link. I understand the need for tracking ads and any referral links, but just a regular link, what purpose would detailed tracking serve beyond what you can get through javascript.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-121866 JB Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:58:02 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-121866 I guess what I don't understand is why one would need to track a mere credit link. I understand the need for tracking ads and any referral links, but just a regular link, what purpose would detailed tracking serve beyond what you can get through javascript. I guess what I don’t understand is why one would need to track a mere credit link. I understand the need for tracking ads and any referral links, but just a regular link, what purpose would detailed tracking serve beyond what you can get through javascript.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-62652 Scott Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:35:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-62652 But without any redirect there is no way to track how many clicks the link got. From a statistical standpoint this solution isn't very ideal. But without any redirect there is no way to track how many clicks the link got. From a statistical standpoint this solution isn’t very ideal.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-121865 Scott Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:35:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-121865 But without any redirect there is no way to track how many clicks the link got. From a statistical standpoint this solution isn't very ideal. But without any redirect there is no way to track how many clicks the link got. From a statistical standpoint this solution isn’t very ideal.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-62650 JB Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:16:17 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-62650 I think the idea solution would be, in most cases, to use simple HTML links to link to sites and 302s for paid links. The use of 302s should be kept to an absolute minimum. I think the idea solution would be, in most cases, to use simple HTML links to link to sites and 302s for paid links. The use of 302s should be kept to an absolute minimum.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-121864 JB Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:16:17 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-121864 I think the idea solution would be, in most cases, to use simple HTML links to link to sites and 302s for paid links. The use of 302s should be kept to an absolute minimum. I think the idea solution would be, in most cases, to use simple HTML links to link to sites and 302s for paid links. The use of 302s should be kept to an absolute minimum.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-62620 Scott Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:13:04 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-62620 So maybe the ideal solution is to use a 302 and a nofollow on a paid link and a 301 on a non-paid link? So maybe the ideal solution is to use a 302 and a nofollow on a paid link and a 301 on a non-paid link?

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/comment-page-1/#comment-121863 Scott Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:13:04 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/06/20/update-stylefeeder-responds-and-gets-banned/#comment-121863 So maybe the ideal solution is to use a 302 and a nofollow on a paid link and a 301 on a non-paid link? So maybe the ideal solution is to use a 302 and a nofollow on a paid link and a 301 on a non-paid link?

]]>