<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Content Theft:  A Guide for Community Admins</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: &#187; Outsourcing and International Copyright Laws Virtual Assistance For Business: Technology, Innovation and offshore outsourcing for Small Medium Enterprises(SME&#8217;s)</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-61937</link> <dc:creator>&#187; Outsourcing and International Copyright Laws Virtual Assistance For Business: Technology, Innovation and offshore outsourcing for Small Medium Enterprises(SME&#8217;s)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-61937</guid> <description>[...] Read Jonathon Bailey&#8217;s take on &#8220;Content Theft: A Guide for Community Admins&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Jonathon Bailey&#8217;s take on &#8220;Content Theft: A Guide for Community Admins&#8221; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Marta</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-59655</link> <dc:creator>John Marta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:41:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-59655</guid> <description>Wow! Thank you for this detailed answer! Brilliant!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thank you for this detailed answer! Brilliant!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Marta</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-122273</link> <dc:creator>John Marta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:41:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-122273</guid> <description>Wow! Thank you for this detailed answer! Brilliant!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thank you for this detailed answer! Brilliant!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-59644</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-59644</guid> <description>John,I&#039;m sorry for the confusion, we&#039;re talking about two different situations though.The question here is one of where the infringement is taking place. If the infringement is taking place on the community site, the administrator has a responsibility as per the DMCA to remove the material if they are properly notified. You can read more about that in the &quot;Contacting the Host&quot; page.If the infringement is taking place on a site outside of the admin&#039;s control, such as a spam blog, the administrator can not do anything since they do not hold the copyright to the material. The DMCA requires that either the copyright holder or a designated agent file the notice.The DMCA does not require the site to make a determination of ownership. If the notice is proper, they have to act. However, there is a counter-notice provision to get falsely removed works restored and severe civil penalties offered to anyone who misuses the DMCA.The law basically says that the admin does not have the responsibility to determine who owns a work, just one to respond to proper notices of infringement that take place on their servers. Yes, the system has been abused a few times (search this site for Michael Crook) but it almost never worked out well for the person misusing it.Hope that clarifies the situation! Let me know if you have any further questions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p><p>I&#8217;m sorry for the confusion, we&#8217;re talking about two different situations though.</p><p>The question here is one of where the infringement is taking place. If the infringement is taking place on the community site, the administrator has a responsibility as per the DMCA to remove the material if they are properly notified. You can read more about that in the &#8220;Contacting the Host&#8221; page.</p><p>If the infringement is taking place on a site outside of the admin&#8217;s control, such as a spam blog, the administrator can not do anything since they do not hold the copyright to the material. The DMCA requires that either the copyright holder or a designated agent file the notice.</p><p>The DMCA does not require the site to make a determination of ownership. If the notice is proper, they have to act. However, there is a counter-notice provision to get falsely removed works restored and severe civil penalties offered to anyone who misuses the DMCA.</p><p>The law basically says that the admin does not have the responsibility to determine who owns a work, just one to respond to proper notices of infringement that take place on their servers. Yes, the system has been abused a few times (search this site for Michael Crook) but it almost never worked out well for the person misusing it.</p><p>Hope that clarifies the situation! Let me know if you have any further questions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-122272</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-122272</guid> <description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sorry for the confusion, we&#039;re talking about two different situations though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The question here is one of where the infringement is taking place. If the infringement is taking place on the community site, the administrator has a responsibility as per the DMCA to remove the material if they are properly notified. You can read more about that in the &quot;Contacting the Host&quot; page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the infringement is taking place on a site outside of the admin&#039;s control, such as a spam blog, the administrator can not do anything since they do not hold the copyright to the material. The DMCA requires that either the copyright holder or a designated agent file the notice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DMCA does not require the site to make a determination of ownership. If the notice is proper, they have to act. However, there is a counter-notice provision to get falsely removed works restored and severe civil penalties offered to anyone who misuses the DMCA. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The law basically says that the admin does not have the responsibility to determine who owns a work, just one to respond to proper notices of infringement that take place on their servers. Yes, the system has been abused a few times (search this site for Michael Crook) but it almost never worked out well for the person misusing it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope that clarifies the situation! Let me know if you have any further questions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p><p>I&#8217;m sorry for the confusion, we&#8217;re talking about two different situations though.</p><p>The question here is one of where the infringement is taking place. If the infringement is taking place on the community site, the administrator has a responsibility as per the DMCA to remove the material if they are properly notified. You can read more about that in the &#8220;Contacting the Host&#8221; page.</p><p>If the infringement is taking place on a site outside of the admin&#8217;s control, such as a spam blog, the administrator can not do anything since they do not hold the copyright to the material. The DMCA requires that either the copyright holder or a designated agent file the notice.</p><p>The DMCA does not require the site to make a determination of ownership. If the notice is proper, they have to act. However, there is a counter-notice provision to get falsely removed works restored and severe civil penalties offered to anyone who misuses the DMCA.</p><p>The law basically says that the admin does not have the responsibility to determine who owns a work, just one to respond to proper notices of infringement that take place on their servers. Yes, the system has been abused a few times (search this site for Michael Crook) but it almost never worked out well for the person misusing it.</p><p>Hope that clarifies the situation! Let me know if you have any further questions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Marta</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-59643</link> <dc:creator>John Marta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-59643</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry, could you please clarify?In this article you&#039;re suggesting that community managers don&#039;t hold the copyright for the content posted by their users, and therefore cannot determine where it could be displayed.So in a nutshell, if Wordpress received an email from you saying another Wordpress user had stolen your content, what should Wordpress do if they can&#039;t determine where that content belongs?Indeed, how could they even know if it&#039;s your content or not? Maybe you&#039;re just making some story up, they can&#039;t tell, plus they have millions of users, it&#039;s probably too time consuming to check each case individually.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, could you please clarify?</p><p>In this article you&#8217;re suggesting that community managers don&#8217;t hold the copyright for the content posted by their users, and therefore cannot determine where it could be displayed.</p><p>So in a nutshell, if Wordpress received an email from you saying another Wordpress user had stolen your content, what should Wordpress do if they can&#8217;t determine where that content belongs?</p><p>Indeed, how could they even know if it&#8217;s your content or not? Maybe you&#8217;re just making some story up, they can&#8217;t tell, plus they have millions of users, it&#8217;s probably too time consuming to check each case individually.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Marta</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-122271</link> <dc:creator>John Marta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-122271</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry, could you please clarify? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this article you&#039;re suggesting that community managers don&#039;t hold the copyright for the content posted by their users, and therefore cannot determine where it could be displayed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in a nutshell, if Wordpress received an email from you saying another Wordpress user had stolen your content, what should Wordpress do if they can&#039;t determine where that content belongs? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, how could they even know if it&#039;s your content or not? Maybe you&#039;re just making some story up, they can&#039;t tell, plus they have millions of users, it&#039;s probably too time consuming to check each case individually.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, could you please clarify?</p><p>In this article you&#8217;re suggesting that community managers don&#8217;t hold the copyright for the content posted by their users, and therefore cannot determine where it could be displayed.</p><p>So in a nutshell, if Wordpress received an email from you saying another Wordpress user had stolen your content, what should Wordpress do if they can&#8217;t determine where that content belongs?</p><p>Indeed, how could they even know if it&#8217;s your content or not? Maybe you&#8217;re just making some story up, they can&#8217;t tell, plus they have millions of users, it&#8217;s probably too time consuming to check each case individually.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-59587</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-59587</guid> <description>Aaron,Thanks for the heads up, I fixed the mistake. I&#039;m not sure why I just now saw your comment in my inbox but I did. However, it has been fixed.Perhaps with all of the running around I&#039;ve neglected my comment inbox some. I am sorry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p><p>Thanks for the heads up, I fixed the mistake. I&#8217;m not sure why I just now saw your comment in my inbox but I did. However, it has been fixed.</p><p>Perhaps with all of the running around I&#8217;ve neglected my comment inbox some. I am sorry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-122270</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-122270</guid> <description>Aaron, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the heads up, I fixed the mistake. I&#039;m not sure why I just now saw your comment in my inbox but I did. However, it has been fixed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps with all of the running around I&#039;ve neglected my comment inbox some. I am sorry.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p><p>Thanks for the heads up, I fixed the mistake. I&#8217;m not sure why I just now saw your comment in my inbox but I did. However, it has been fixed.</p><p>Perhaps with all of the running around I&#8217;ve neglected my comment inbox some. I am sorry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/comment-page-1/#comment-59568</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/05/09/content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins/#comment-59568</guid> <description>Just to clarify. Under ch. 204(a) only the grantor must sign. The grantee is not required to execute the writing.This is not legal advice. Please seek competent counsel.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify. Under ch. 204(a) only the grantor must sign. The grantee is not required to execute the writing.</p><p>This is not legal advice. Please seek competent counsel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-18 19:49:42 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      19
Cached queries:     6
Total query time:   0.035
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |    0.002 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.003 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2007' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='5' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='9' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'content-theft-a-guide-for-community-admins' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '487' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (487) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (487)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |     0.01 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-07-22 07:02:18'
   11 |    0.011 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-17 11:41:45'
   12 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-17 11:41:45'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-16 19:33:07'
   14 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-16 19:33:07'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-16 18:16:26'
   16 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-16 18:16:26'
   17 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-11 19:52:37'
   18 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-11 19:52:37'
   19 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 487 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2007-05-10 10:05:20'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_cf3745d9edc81afa0109953e85a9b3fe
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.886s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 GMT
ETag:               "c2f9cd86c24cda3b43d77e39b7d48669"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->