<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Internet Archive Ruled Inadmissible</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-129148</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-129148</guid> <description>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#039;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#39;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.</p><p>Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-127968</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-127968</guid> <description>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#039;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#39;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.</p><p>Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-123313</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-123313</guid> <description>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#039;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is very good news and thank you for adding it to this post. I&#39;ll be sure to note that you would be willing to provide such help should it become necessary. Hopefully though, it never will be.</p><p>Thank you for your thoughts and assurances!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Julian Boote</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-123311</link> <dc:creator>Julian Boote</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:25:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-123311</guid> <description>Jonathan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We enjoyed reading your article.  It&#039;s only a pity we didn&#039;t know of its posting at the time, as we&#039;d have been happy to comment sooner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point about the requirement of additional evidence such as affidavits regarding how services such as our works is entirely logical, and - in duly noted&#039;s case - it has never been our expectation to only provide a certificate upon a client&#039;s regsitration of their work.  We have not believed that, and only that, would be acceptable for a court.  In the event a client&#039;s work is infringed, our policy is at the very least to provide them their work plus a letter from the company, signed by one of its directors, verifying the date stamp of the registration, and outlining our processes and our technologies that enable us to do so.  We are also willing to sign affidavits about such at the client&#039;s request.  While this latter aspect would require additional charges (the notary&#039;s services, admin etc.) any such charges would not be prohibitive against its value as admissible evidence in court.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, we can&#039;t make guarantees as to just what evidence a court may decide to accept or refuse, as that is simply out of our hands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Julian &amp; John Boote&lt;br&gt;Duly noted® Limited</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan</p><p>We enjoyed reading your article.  It&#39;s only a pity we didn&#39;t know of its posting at the time, as we&#39;d have been happy to comment sooner.</p><p>The point about the requirement of additional evidence such as affidavits regarding how services such as our works is entirely logical, and &#8211; in duly noted&#39;s case &#8211; it has never been our expectation to only provide a certificate upon a client&#39;s regsitration of their work.  We have not believed that, and only that, would be acceptable for a court.  In the event a client&#39;s work is infringed, our policy is at the very least to provide them their work plus a letter from the company, signed by one of its directors, verifying the date stamp of the registration, and outlining our processes and our technologies that enable us to do so.  We are also willing to sign affidavits about such at the client&#39;s request.  While this latter aspect would require additional charges (the notary&#39;s services, admin etc.) any such charges would not be prohibitive against its value as admissible evidence in court.</p><p>Of course, we can&#39;t make guarantees as to just what evidence a court may decide to accept or refuse, as that is simply out of our hands.</p><p>Julian &#038; John Boote<br
/>Duly noted® Limited</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Julian Boote</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-123310</link> <dc:creator>Julian Boote</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:23:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-123310</guid> <description>Jonathan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We enjoyed reading your article.  It&#039;s only a pity we didn&#039;t know of its posting at the time, as we&#039;d have been happy to comment sooner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point about the requirement of additional evidence such as affidavits regarding how services such as our works is entirely logical, and - in duly noted&#039;s case - it has never been our expectation to only provide a certificate upon a client&#039;s regsitration of their work.  We have not believed that, and only that, would be acceptable for a court.  In the event a client&#039;s work is infringed, our policy is at the very least to provide them their work plus a letter from the company, signed by one of its directors, verifying the date stamp of the registration, and outlining our processes and our technologies that enable us to do so.  We are also willing to sign affidavits about such at the client&#039;s request.  While this latter aspect would require additional charges (the notary&#039;s services, admin etc.) any such charges would not be prohibitive against its value as admissible evidence in court.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, we can&#039;t make guarantees as to just what evidence a court may decide to accept or refuse, as that is simply out of our hands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Julian &amp; John Boote&lt;br&gt;Duly noted® Limited</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan</p><p>We enjoyed reading your article.  It&#39;s only a pity we didn&#39;t know of its posting at the time, as we&#39;d have been happy to comment sooner.</p><p>The point about the requirement of additional evidence such as affidavits regarding how services such as our works is entirely logical, and &#8211; in duly noted&#39;s case &#8211; it has never been our expectation to only provide a certificate upon a client&#39;s regsitration of their work.  We have not believed that, and only that, would be acceptable for a court.  In the event a client&#39;s work is infringed, our policy is at the very least to provide them their work plus a letter from the company, signed by one of its directors, verifying the date stamp of the registration, and outlining our processes and our technologies that enable us to do so.  We are also willing to sign affidavits about such at the client&#39;s request.  While this latter aspect would require additional charges (the notary&#39;s services, admin etc.) any such charges would not be prohibitive against its value as admissible evidence in court.</p><p>Of course, we can&#39;t make guarantees as to just what evidence a court may decide to accept or refuse, as that is simply out of our hands.</p><p>Julian &#038; John Boote<br
/>Duly noted® Limited</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-62623</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-62623</guid> <description>Chris,I believe that Lars accidentally emailed me his reply. I&#039;m going to forward you the relevant portions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p><p>I believe that Lars accidentally emailed me his reply. I&#8217;m going to forward you the relevant portions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-120839</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-120839</guid> <description>Chris,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe that Lars accidentally emailed me his reply. I&#039;m going to forward you the relevant portions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p><p>I believe that Lars accidentally emailed me his reply. I&#8217;m going to forward you the relevant portions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Matthieu</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-62401</link> <dc:creator>Chris Matthieu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-62401</guid> <description>How does this url service handle advertisements such as google ads in the page?  I would imagine that the next time the page is loaded and the ads don&#039;t match, the hash will be invalid.  Lars, can you clarify?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this url service handle advertisements such as google ads in the page?  I would imagine that the next time the page is loaded and the ads don&#8217;t match, the hash will be invalid.  Lars, can you clarify?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Matthieu</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-120838</link> <dc:creator>Chris Matthieu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-120838</guid> <description>How does this url service handle advertisements such as google ads in the page?  I would imagine that the next time the page is loaded and the ads don&#039;t match, the hash will be invalid.  Lars, can you clarify?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this url service handle advertisements such as google ads in the page?  I would imagine that the next time the page is loaded and the ads don&#8217;t match, the hash will be invalid.  Lars, can you clarify?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/comment-page-1/#comment-62352</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/23/internet-archive-ruled-inadmissible/#comment-62352</guid> <description>Lars,This is a very interesting service, I&#039;m going to see about emailing you in a few days to see about covering it here.From what I&#039;ve seen though, it looks great and very easy to use.Thank you for posting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lars,</p><p>This is a very interesting service, I&#8217;m going to see about emailing you in a few days to see about covering it here.</p><p>From what I&#8217;ve seen though, it looks great and very easy to use.</p><p>Thank you for posting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-19 18:42:24 -->