http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/comment-page-1/#comment-54795 How Wordpress.com Stays Spam Free « TechFold Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:01:11 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/#comment-54795 [...] to the anti-spam features list as well, as pointed out in the context of LiveJournal, in another PT article: by assuming that the only LiveJournal Friends of a spam blog are also spam blogs (a valid [...] [...] to the anti-spam features list as well, as pointed out in the context of LiveJournal, in another PT article: by assuming that the only LiveJournal Friends of a spam blog are also spam blogs (a valid [...]

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/comment-page-1/#comment-54582 Anil Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:03:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/#comment-54582 I should point out -- LJ is far from perfect here, sinceit's still early days for this kind of filtering. But I've had the chance to see the thinking that our team's put into this, as well as the great results they've gotten out of it, and I think it's going to be another great tool in the arsenal of anti-spam tech. I should point out — LJ is far from perfect here, sinceit’s still early days for this kind of filtering. But I’ve had the chance to see the thinking that our team’s put into this, as well as the great results they’ve gotten out of it, and I think it’s going to be another great tool in the arsenal of anti-spam tech.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/comment-page-1/#comment-121851 Anil Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:03:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/04/10/update-and-livejournal-too/#comment-121851 I should point out -- LJ is far from perfect here, sinceit's still early days for this kind of filtering. But I've had the chance to see the thinking that our team's put into this, as well as the great results they've gotten out of it, and I think it's going to be another great tool in the arsenal of anti-spam tech. I should point out — LJ is far from perfect here, sinceit's still early days for this kind of filtering. But I've had the chance to see the thinking that our team's put into this, as well as the great results they've gotten out of it, and I think it's going to be another great tool in the arsenal of anti-spam tech.

]]>