My feed is still being reposted in its entirety. I replied to the above email from Nooz/Rojo earlier this week but have gotten no response.

“Thank you for your notification. We will require the account holder to remove the material in question; it may take several days for the process to be complete.

Please note that if the account holder has a good faith belief that he or she is being asked to remove or disable this material as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material, the account holder is
entitled to ask that the material be restored by sending Six Apart a counter notification as described in Section 512(g) of the Copyright Act. If this happens, we will contact you with further information.

Sincerely,
Rojo Customer Support”

I’m not quite sure what they mean by account holder and if I’m entitled to know who this person is who might be petitioning Rojo/Nooz to have my content reposted.

At this moment both Rojo & Nooz are down. I’m guessing they’re doing some stuff.

"Thank you for your notification. We will require the account holder to remove the material in question; it may take several days for the process to be complete.

Please note that if the account holder has a good faith belief that he or she is being asked to remove or disable this material as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material, the account holder is

entitled to ask that the material be restored by sending Six Apart a counter notification as described in Section 512(g) of the Copyright Act. If this happens, we will contact you with further information.

Sincerely,

Rojo Customer Support"

I'm not quite sure what they mean by account holder and if I'm entitled to know who this person is who might be petitioning Rojo/Nooz to have my content reposted.

At this moment both Rojo & Nooz are down. I'm guessing they're doing some stuff.

Thank you Jonathan. There is no way that I could have fixed this on my own after seeing what you had to go through to get it done and I don’t think SixApart would have figured it out in any timely fashion.

Well, I may be speaking too soon, we’ll see if my content is actually removed and if there are any other remedies for the fact that they’ve been reposting my blog and thousands of others for a year.

So you’re saying because I’m the only one with a problem, it’s not really a problem that deserves notice, or you couldn’t imagine that someone would want to opt out of a scraping service you didn’t even know you had?

Nope, I was just trying to explain how it broke and I wasn’t aware of it. Hope that helps.

So you’re saying because I’m the only one with a problem, it’s not really a problem that deserves notice, or you couldn’t imagine that someone would want to opt out of a scraping service you didn’t even know you had?

Nope, I was just trying to explain how it broke and I wasn’t aware of it. Hope that helps.

Anil – How could the fact that the copyright email address for both Rojo.com and Nooz.com nor the Abuse@ email address not work be considered a bug? And by the way, they still don’t work and no revised information has been placed on the Nooz site. I can see programming taking a while … how hard is it to update the text with an email address or form that works?

Besides that, I’ve faxed (twice) and sent my DMCA take down via snailmail. How many bugs do you have?

“For what it’s worth, we didn’t notice the problem right away because almost nobody every emails any requests in, despite millions of people using our various services.”

So you’re saying because I’m the only one with a problem, it’s not really a problem that deserves notice, or you couldn’t imagine that someone would want to opt out of a scraping service you didn’t even know you had?

As far as I can tell, you didn’t “notice” the problem at all. Jonathan had to bring it to your attention.

On a brighter note, I noticed there is a change in the programming of Nooz at the moment. Clicking on the title of the post will now take you to the actual blog (via a redirect from the feed address) but clicking on the “attribution” (which is not the way I attribute my blog, thankyouverymuch) takes you to the Nooz page of all posts from that blog … not to the owner of the content.

Anil – How could the fact that the copyright email address for both Rojo.com and Nooz.com nor the Abuse@ email address not work be considered a bug? And by the way, they still don’t work and no revised information has been placed on the Nooz site. I can see programming taking a while … how hard is it to update the text with an email address or form that works?

Besides that, I’ve faxed (twice) and sent my DMCA take down via snailmail. How many bugs do you have?

“For what it’s worth, we didn’t notice the problem right away because almost nobody every emails any requests in, despite millions of people using our various services.”

So you’re saying because I’m the only one with a problem, it’s not really a problem that deserves notice, or you couldn’t imagine that someone would want to opt out of a scraping service you didn’t even know you had?

As far as I can tell, you didn’t “notice” the problem at all. Jonathan had to bring it to your attention.

On a brighter note, I noticed there is a change in the programming of Nooz at the moment. Clicking on the title of the post will now take you to the actual blog (via a redirect from the feed address) but clicking on the “attribution” (which is not the way I attribute my blog, thankyouverymuch) takes you to the Nooz page of all posts from that blog … not to the owner of the content.