It would appear that he is scraping my content for blackhat CPC marketing.

I have had this happen before. The last time, I contacted the host of the site (one of the largest hosts on the Internet) I did not receive any response to the emails I sent them. I could not get the email address of the person doing it, so have to resort to a little JavaScript file that redirected their links to a site on anal prolapse. After about one week, I received a pretty nasty email from the person stealing the content. Still it worked pretty well, as he no longer linked to my site.

But it is annoying, as it impacts on Google ranking and earnings etc, not to mention page views.

Let me know if you are interested and would like more details.

Regards Ross…

It would appear that he is scraping my content for blackhat CPC marketing.

I have had this happen before. The last time, I contacted the host of the site (one of the largest hosts on the Internet) I did not receive any response to the emails I sent them. I could not get the email address of the person doing it, so have to resort to a little JavaScript file that redirected their links to a site on anal prolapse. After about one week, I received a pretty nasty email from the person stealing the content. Still it worked pretty well, as he no longer linked to my site.

But it is annoying, as it impacts on Google ranking and earnings etc, not to mention page views.

Let me know if you are interested and would like more details.

Regards Ross…

Goood blog you have there. Lot of goodies !

There is a copyright violation protest going on against Yahoo. Yeah corpo gianto Yahoo plagiarizing contents from bloggers

chk out de blog.
http://myinjimanga.blogspot.com/2007/02/bloggers-protest-event-against-yahoo.html

Goood blog you have there. Lot of goodies !

There is a copyright violation protest going on against Yahoo. Yeah corpo gianto Yahoo plagiarizing contents from bloggers

chk out de blog.
http://myinjimanga.blogspot.com/2007/02/blogger...

For one, Perez still portrays himself as a simple little blogger – which is a convenient label to hide behind to slander, bully, dehumanize, and just plain destroy personalities and guise – while racking in advertising money for it.

Yet at the same time, he presents himself as a serious news organisation in the media (a business), makes thousands of dollars on it as you observed, and gets free exposure in the press & TV which results in traffic for him.

But that’s where it ends. Cause his enterprise blatantly refuses to take any of the responsibilities that come with the stature it is being given..and really I can’t imagine any other news organisation or business which could get away with what all the slander, with the law allowing it.

Bottom line: I think Perez’s site is a very dangerous enteprise, precisely because it is currently being misrepresented to everyone. It has nothing to do with internet freedom at all..

For one, Perez still portrays himself as a simple little blogger – which is a convenient label to hide behind to slander, bully, dehumanize, and just plain destroy personalities and guise – while racking in advertising money for it.

Yet at the same time, he presents himself as a serious news organisation in the media (a business), makes thousands of dollars on it as you observed, and gets free exposure in the press & TV which results in traffic for him.

But that’s where it ends. Cause his enterprise blatantly refuses to take any of the responsibilities that come with the stature it is being given..and really I can’t imagine any other news organisation or business which could get away with what all the slander, with the law allowing it.

Bottom line: I think Perez’s site is a very dangerous enteprise, precisely because it is currently being misrepresented to everyone. It has nothing to do with internet freedom at all..

It may have originally been serious, but as a lot was played out on both sites and with the lack of follow-up action, I feel that X17 and Perezhilton have reached an agreement where he has ceased his previous action of using their images, with no further legal measures taken.

The amount of publicity and, correspondingly traffic that the story generated, obviously helped both sites.

On the specific issue of Hilton fighting in court, in the Universal case, he would have to use the arguments you mention for his defense. For the suits brought by paparazzi agencies, I think if any suit came to court, you may see him use another argument about the ownership rights of the individual themselves in the photos. This would have the potential to set precedent pertaining to the paparazzi themselves.

Just my thoughts, but where Perezhilton is concerned, there is always a large element of fabrication and manipulation.

It may have originally been serious, but as a lot was played out on both sites and with the lack of follow-up action, I feel that X17 and Perezhilton have reached an agreement where he has ceased his previous action of using their images, with no further legal measures taken.

The amount of publicity and, correspondingly traffic that the story generated, obviously helped both sites.

On the specific issue of Hilton fighting in court, in the Universal case, he would have to use the arguments you mention for his defense. For the suits brought by paparazzi agencies, I think if any suit came to court, you may see him use another argument about the ownership rights of the individual themselves in the photos. This would have the potential to set precedent pertaining to the paparazzi themselves.

Just my thoughts, but where Perezhilton is concerned, there is always a large element of fabrication and manipulation.