<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Warning Headers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: WebMetricsGuru</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38764</link> <dc:creator>WebMetricsGuru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38764</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA...&lt;/strong&gt;Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere&#160;by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco.&quot;... Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA&#8230;</strong></p><p>Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere&nbsp;by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco.&quot;&#8230; Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WebMetricsGuru</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122219</link> <dc:creator>WebMetricsGuru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122219</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere&#160;by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco.&quot;... Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA&#8230;</strong></p><p>Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere&nbsp;by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco.&quot;&#8230; Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked&#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38339</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38339</guid> <description>I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. :-(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. <img
src='http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122218</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122218</guid> <description>I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. :-(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. <img
src='http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MySmallVentures</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38271</link> <dc:creator>MySmallVentures</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:21:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38271</guid> <description>I&#039;m thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MySmallVentures</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122217</link> <dc:creator>MySmallVentures</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:21:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122217</guid> <description>I&#039;m thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38226</link> <dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38226</guid> <description>Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic.I&#039;ve heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I&#039;d heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank.What I hadn&#039;t thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I&#039;ll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.Thanks again for this insightful article.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic.</p><p>I&#8217;ve heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I&#8217;d heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank.</p><p>What I hadn&#8217;t thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I&#8217;ll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.</p><p>Thanks again for this insightful article.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: legal - uttaruk.com &#187; Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38225</link> <dc:creator>legal - uttaruk.com &#187; Warning Headers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:42:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38225</guid> <description>[...] post by jb and software by Elliott Back    [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by jb and software by Elliott Back    [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122216</link> <dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:47:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122216</guid> <description>Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I&#039;d heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I hadn&#039;t thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I&#039;ll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again for this insightful article.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic.</p><p>I&#8217;ve heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I&#8217;d heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank.</p><p>What I hadn&#8217;t thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I&#8217;ll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.</p><p>Thanks again for this insightful article.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38221</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:41:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38221</guid> <description>Gayla,Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It&#039;s a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I&#039;ve written about it before here:http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/Give it a look if you&#039;re interested and, if you need any help, don&#039;t hesitate to send me an email.Good luck with your scraper!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gayla,</p><p>Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It&#8217;s a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I&#8217;ve written about it before here:</p><p><a
href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/" rel="nofollow">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/</a></p><p>Give it a look if you&#8217;re interested and, if you need any help, don&#8217;t hesitate to send me an email.</p><p>Good luck with your scraper!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-20 07:43:46 -->