Comments on: Warning Headers http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: WebMetricsGuru http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38764 WebMetricsGuru Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:31:23 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38764 <strong>Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA...</strong> Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco."... Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked...... Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA…

Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco."… Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked……

]]> By: WebMetricsGuru http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122219 WebMetricsGuru Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:31:23 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122219 <strong>Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA...</strong><br><br>Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco."... Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked...... Spam Blogs Study shows the largest concentration of Blog Spam comes from Mountain View, CA…

Hmm, Steve Rubel mentioned New Stats on Spam in the Blogosphere by the eBuity Group that places the nexus of Blog Spam in Mountain View, Washington DC and San Francisco."… Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. We ranked……

]]> By: Alex http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122218 Alex Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:48:35 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122218 I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. :-( I fear the problem is much more basic. Maybe these strategies do not work as well as they should, because most of the readers plagiarize, themselves! This is a question of values, and I get the sense that more and more people simply do not see anything wrong with plagiarism. Until we fix *that* problem, we are basically taking water out of the boat with a bucket to keep the Titanic from sinking. :-(

]]> By: MySmallVentures http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122217 MySmallVentures Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:21:37 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122217 I'm thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this. I’m thinking of turning off full post feeds because of this.

]]> By: legal - uttaruk.com » Warning Headers http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38225 legal - uttaruk.com » Warning Headers Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:42:03 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38225 [...] post by jb and software by Elliott Back [...] [...] post by jb and software by Elliott Back [...]

]]> By: Elaine Vigneault http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122216 Elaine Vigneault Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:47:14 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122216 Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic. <br><br>I've heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I'd heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank. <br><br>What I hadn't thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I'll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.<br><br>Thanks again for this insightful article. Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic.

I’ve heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I’d heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank.

What I hadn’t thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I’ll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.

Thanks again for this insightful article.

]]> By: JB http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38221 JB Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:41:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38221 Gayla, Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It's a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I've written about it before here: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/ Give it a look if you're interested and, if you need any help, don't hesitate to send me an email. Good luck with your scraper! Gayla,

Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It’s a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I’ve written about it before here:

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/

Give it a look if you’re interested and, if you need any help, don’t hesitate to send me an email.

Good luck with your scraper!

]]> By: JB http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122215 JB Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:41:33 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122215 Gayla,<br><br>Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It's a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I've written about it before here:<br><br><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsense-and-the-dmca/">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsen...</a><br><br>Give it a look if you're interested and, if you need any help, don't hesitate to send me an email.<br><br>Good luck with your scraper! Gayla,

Just a heads up on this one, to get Google Adsense to respond to your request, you most likely will need to file a DMCA complaint with them. It’s a pain, especially since it has to be faxed or mailed in and is legally dubious, and I’ve written about it before here:

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/08/31/adsen…

Give it a look if you’re interested and, if you need any help, don’t hesitate to send me an email.

Good luck with your scraper!

]]> By: Gayla McCord http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-122214 Gayla McCord Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:35:55 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-122214 Thanks for the call out on Dating Dames. The one thing I made sure I did prior to making that particular post was to report them through their Google Ads. Hopefully all these efforts combined will help :)<br><br>Thanks again for all your efforts<br>Gayla Thanks for the call out on Dating Dames. The one thing I made sure I did prior to making that particular post was to report them through their Google Ads. Hopefully all these efforts combined will help :)

Thanks again for all your efforts
Gayla

]]> By: Elaine Vigneault http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-38226 Elaine Vigneault Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:47:14 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/02/01/warning-headers/#comment-38226 Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic. I've heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I'd heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank. What I hadn't thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I'll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership. Thanks again for this insightful article. Worthwhile read. Thanks for writing on this topic.

I've heard of linking back to yourself periodically for this and other reasons. And I'd heard that duplicate content lowers your search engine rank.

What I hadn't thought about was how readers might be turned off by reading a warning. I tend to write whatever I want without thought to who my readers are and what they want to read. Obviously I'll have to try a little harder if I want to increase and maintain a large readership.

Thanks again for this insightful article.

]]>