http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/29/twil-discusses-implied-licenses-on-rss-feeds/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/29/twil-discusses-implied-licenses-on-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-52526 PlagiarismToday » Six Apart/Rojo: Now Spam Bloggers? Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:14:37 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/29/twil-discusses-implied-licenses-on-rss-feeds/#comment-52526 [...] Six Apart allows this to continue are dubious at best. Legal scholars have already agreed that there is no implied license with RSS feeds, this use, as long as it is executed without permission, is basically copyright infringement. [...] [...] Six Apart allows this to continue are dubious at best. Legal scholars have already agreed that there is no implied license with RSS feeds, this use, as long as it is executed without permission, is basically copyright infringement. [...]

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/29/twil-discusses-implied-licenses-on-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-41012 PlagiarismToday » Dapper and Yahoo! Pipes: Scraping Redux Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:11:46 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/01/29/twil-discusses-implied-licenses-on-rss-feeds/#comment-41012 [...] Lawyers seem to agree that there is no implied license with RSS, and definitely not one with HTML, Dapper is still skating on dangerous ice and needs to rethink how it approaches unregistered sites. [...] [...] Lawyers seem to agree that there is no implied license with RSS, and definitely not one with HTML, Dapper is still skating on dangerous ice and needs to rethink how it approaches unregistered sites. [...]

]]>