<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Addresses Duplicate Content</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: CrossroadsReviews.com</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-129194</link> <dc:creator>CrossroadsReviews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-129194</guid> <description>Although this post is years old, I&#039;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic - a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &amp; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#039;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this post is years old, I&#39;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic &#8211; a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &#038; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#39;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CrossroadsReviews.com</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-128121</link> <dc:creator>CrossroadsReviews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-128121</guid> <description>Although this post is years old, I&#039;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic - a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &amp; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#039;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this post is years old, I&#39;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic &#8211; a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &#038; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#39;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CrossroadsReviews.com</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-126509</link> <dc:creator>CrossroadsReviews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-126509</guid> <description>Although this post is years old, I&#039;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic - a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &amp; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#039;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this post is years old, I&#39;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic &#8211; a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &#038; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#39;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Modified Scraping on the Rise</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-67142</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Modified Scraping on the Rise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:34:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-67142</guid> <description>[...] please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!It appears that Google&#8217;s push to handle duplicate content may be having an unintended side [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!It appears that Google&#8217;s push to handle duplicate content may be having an unintended side [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Five Practical Reasons for Fighting Plagiarism</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-62056</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Five Practical Reasons for Fighting Plagiarism</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-62056</guid> <description>[...] nsfw) as it pertains to scraping, one penalty is certain, increased competition. Even if there is no algorithmic &#8220;penalty&#8221; placed on your site, the plagiarists will still show up for in your keyword results. For example, if you had a keyword [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nsfw) as it pertains to scraping, one penalty is certain, increased competition. Even if there is no algorithmic &#8220;penalty&#8221; placed on your site, the plagiarists will still show up for in your keyword results. For example, if you had a keyword [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Social News: Another Plagiarism Concern</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56666</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Social News: Another Plagiarism Concern</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:59:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-56666</guid> <description>[...] Google has addressed that and said that it should not be a major concern, I have worked with several businesses that have had [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has addressed that and said that it should not be a major concern, I have worked with several businesses that have had [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; When Will Google Stand Up to Spam?</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-49512</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; When Will Google Stand Up to Spam?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-49512</guid> <description>[...] you talk a great game about being able to detect duplicate content, but yet junk content is still getting through and it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you talk a great game about being able to detect duplicate content, but yet junk content is still getting through and it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Warning Headers</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-38219</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Warning Headers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:32:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-38219</guid> <description>[...] Though warnings may not stop scraping or even effectively warn users, they can defend against one of the fears that comes with scraping, search engine penalties. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though warnings may not stop scraping or even effectively warn users, they can defend against one of the fears that comes with scraping, search engine penalties. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; 2006: A Look Back</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-31941</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; 2006: A Look Back</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-31941</guid> <description>[...] I would say that it hasn&#8217;t made it to the web in a major way given the ineffectiveness of automated translation tools, but Google&#8217;s hint about translated text not being duplicate content may indicate a growing problem in this field. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would say that it hasn&#8217;t made it to the web in a major way given the ineffectiveness of automated translation tools, but Google&#8217;s hint about translated text not being duplicate content may indicate a growing problem in this field. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ralph Dagza</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-31112</link> <dc:creator>Ralph Dagza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:16:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-31112</guid> <description>Congratulations!I saw your site listed on 9rules</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!</p><p>I saw your site listed on 9rules</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/19 queries in 0.087 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: files.plagiarismtoday.com

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2010-03-21 06:19:01 -->