<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Addresses Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrossroadsReviews.co</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-128121</link>
		<dc:creator>CrossroadsReviews.co</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-128121</guid>
		<description>Although this post is years old, I&#039;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic - a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &amp; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#039;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this post is years old, I&#039;v only just reached it as a result of my quest to understand the real issue behind the mind buggling duplicate content penalty. I use article marketing as my sole source of traffic &#8211; a method that usually requires posting to as many directories as possible &amp; could be confused for duplicate content. What I&#039;ve learned from this post is to post the article to my blog first, then submit to these directories with a link back to my website, the origin of the articles. This answers all my questions. Thanks Jonathan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Modified Scraping on the Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-67142</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Modified Scraping on the Rise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-67142</guid>
		<description>[...] please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!It appears that Google&#8217;s push to handle duplicate content may be having an unintended side [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!It appears that Google&#8217;s push to handle duplicate content may be having an unintended side [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Five Practical Reasons for Fighting Plagiarism</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-62056</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Five Practical Reasons for Fighting Plagiarism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-62056</guid>
		<description>[...] nsfw) as it pertains to scraping, one penalty is certain, increased competition. Even if there is no algorithmic &#8220;penalty&#8221; placed on your site, the plagiarists will still show up for in your keyword results. For example, if you had a keyword [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nsfw) as it pertains to scraping, one penalty is certain, increased competition. Even if there is no algorithmic &#8220;penalty&#8221; placed on your site, the plagiarists will still show up for in your keyword results. For example, if you had a keyword [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Social News: Another Plagiarism Concern</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-56666</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Social News: Another Plagiarism Concern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-56666</guid>
		<description>[...] Google has addressed that and said that it should not be a major concern, I have worked with several businesses that have had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has addressed that and said that it should not be a major concern, I have worked with several businesses that have had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; When Will Google Stand Up to Spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-49512</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; When Will Google Stand Up to Spam?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-49512</guid>
		<description>[...] you talk a great game about being able to detect duplicate content, but yet junk content is still getting through and it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you talk a great game about being able to detect duplicate content, but yet junk content is still getting through and it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Warning Headers</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-38219</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Warning Headers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-38219</guid>
		<description>[...] Though warnings may not stop scraping or even effectively warn users, they can defend against one of the fears that comes with scraping, search engine penalties. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though warnings may not stop scraping or even effectively warn users, they can defend against one of the fears that comes with scraping, search engine penalties. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; 2006: A Look Back</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-31941</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; 2006: A Look Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-31941</guid>
		<description>[...] I would say that it hasn&#8217;t made it to the web in a major way given the ineffectiveness of automated translation tools, but Google&#8217;s hint about translated text not being duplicate content may indicate a growing problem in this field. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would say that it hasn&#8217;t made it to the web in a major way given the ineffectiveness of automated translation tools, but Google&#8217;s hint about translated text not being duplicate content may indicate a growing problem in this field. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Dagza</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-121828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Dagza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-121828</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saw your site listed on 9rules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! </p>
<p>I saw your site listed on 9rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Dagza</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/12/21/google-addresses-duplicate-content/comment-page-1/#comment-31112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Dagza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=392#comment-31112</guid>
		<description>Congratulations!  
 
I saw your site listed on 9rules </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! </p>
<p>I saw your site listed on 9rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 20:54:27 -->
