First off, I’m sorry to both of you that I haven’t responded sooner. I was gone this weekend on a holiday and really have just sat back down to site work today.

I ran the articles in question through a battery of plagiarism checks. I used several tools including some that are experimental and I found no evidence of plagiarism. If the content was plagiarized, it wasn’t from the Web.

I’m no fan of Michael Crook, I think that much is clear, but I don’t believe he is a plagiarist, at least not when it comes to these articles. Many bad names can be said about Michael Crook, but plagiarist is not one of them at this time.

It would have been ironic for someone who claims to support copyright holders to be a plagiarist and there have been cases of that in the past, it’s not the case here.

I hope that puts this to rest.

First off, I'm sorry to both of you that I haven't responded sooner. I was gone this weekend on a holiday and really have just sat back down to site work today.

I ran the articles in question through a battery of plagiarism checks. I used several tools including some that are experimental and I found no evidence of plagiarism. If the content was plagiarized, it wasn't from the Web.

I'm no fan of Michael Crook, I think that much is clear, but I don't believe he is a plagiarist, at least not when it comes to these articles. Many bad names can be said about Michael Crook, but plagiarist is not one of them at this time.

It would have been ironic for someone who claims to support copyright holders to be a plagiarist and there have been cases of that in the past, it's not the case here.

I hope that puts this to rest.

So which is it, Craigy-poo? Is he copying these articles from “someone else”, that “someone else” whom you’ve failed to point out, or is he experienced in dodging process servers?

Seems to me Craigy has an axe to grind, and fails to get proof before making accusations.

So which is it, Craigy-poo? Is he copying these articles from "someone else", that "someone else" whom you've failed to point out, or is he experienced in dodging process servers?

Seems to me Craigy has an axe to grind, and fails to get proof before making accusations.

It seems to me that he infact may have plagiarized those article. He just changed 3 or 4 words so they fit his case.

Look at the first one. He specifically says “As of December, I have 1 case against me” Then later in the article, it says “Even if I lose both of these cases”

In the dodging servers article, he says “I have become quite adept at dodging process servers, and in fact make it a point to do so in most cases.” Hes speaking as if he has done this many times before in trials.

He has obviously copied these articles from someone else

It seems to me that he infact may have plagiarized those article. He just changed 3 or 4 words so they fit his case.

Look at the first one. He specifically says "As of December, I have 1 case against me" Then later in the article, it says "Even if I lose both of these cases"

In the dodging servers article, he says "I have become quite adept at dodging process servers, and in fact make it a point to do so in most cases." Hes speaking as if he has done this many times before in trials.

He has obviously copied these articles from someone else