<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use Copyright Notices?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Ovalle</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-29867</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Ovalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-29867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d add a couple of things. ^_^

Although it is nearly three decades since you&#039;ve had to register a work, the copyright notice was necessary for a longer period of time. The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which removed the requirement for formalities, wasn&#039;t enacted until 1989. 

Also, whether or not a copyright symbol appears does affect older works. For example, a work published without notice between 1978 and 1989 and not registered may be in the public domain. Peter Hirtle has a handy chart:
http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d add a couple of things. ^_^</p>
<p>Although it is nearly three decades since you&#8217;ve had to register a work, the copyright notice was necessary for a longer period of time. The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which removed the requirement for formalities, wasn&#8217;t enacted until 1989. </p>
<p>Also, whether or not a copyright symbol appears does affect older works. For example, a work published without notice between 1978 and 1989 and not registered may be in the public domain. Peter Hirtle has a handy chart:<br />
<a href="http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Ovalle</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-122919</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Ovalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-122919</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d add a couple of things. ^_^&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although it is nearly three decades since you&#039;ve had to register a work, the copyright notice was necessary for a longer period of time. The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which removed the requirement for formalities, wasn&#039;t enacted until 1989. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, whether or not a copyright symbol appears does affect older works. For example, a work published without notice between 1978 and 1989 and not registered may be in the public domain. Peter Hirtle has a handy chart:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtl...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d add a couple of things. ^_^</p>
<p>Although it is nearly three decades since you&#8217;ve had to register a work, the copyright notice was necessary for a longer period of time. The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, which removed the requirement for formalities, wasn&#8217;t enacted until 1989. </p>
<p>Also, whether or not a copyright symbol appears does affect older works. For example, a work published without notice between 1978 and 1989 and not registered may be in the public domain. Peter Hirtle has a handy chart:<br /><a href="http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm">http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtl&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Matthieu</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-122918</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Matthieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-122918</guid>
		<description>In addition to (c)opyright marks and claims, you could stamp your work with (N)umly numbers.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://numly.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Numly&lt;/a&gt; provides authors and artists a way to freely or inexpensively submit their digital works online along with their desired All Rights Reserved or Creative Commons license and receive a verifiable Numly Number and HTML that can be embedded into your work to prove your copyright.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Numly Numbers are linked back to Numly&#039;s database to provide third party, non-repudiation services and time stamps of submitted works and meta data associated with the copyright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to (c)opyright marks and claims, you could stamp your work with (N)umly numbers.  <a href="http://numly.com" rel="nofollow">Numly</a> provides authors and artists a way to freely or inexpensively submit their digital works online along with their desired All Rights Reserved or Creative Commons license and receive a verifiable Numly Number and HTML that can be embedded into your work to prove your copyright.  </p>
<p>Numly Numbers are linked back to Numly&#8217;s database to provide third party, non-repudiation services and time stamps of submitted works and meta data associated with the copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Matthieu</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-28373</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Matthieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-28373</guid>
		<description>In addition to (c)opyright marks and claims, you could stamp your work with (N)umly numbers.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://numly.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Numly&lt;/a&gt; provides authors and artists a way to freely or inexpensively submit their digital works online along with their desired All Rights Reserved or Creative Commons license and receive a verifiable Numly Number and HTML that can be embedded into your work to prove your copyright.   
 
Numly Numbers are linked back to Numly&#039;s database to provide third party, non-repudiation services and time stamps of submitted works and meta data associated with the copyright. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to (c)opyright marks and claims, you could stamp your work with (N)umly numbers.  <a href="http://numly.com" rel="nofollow">Numly</a> provides authors and artists a way to freely or inexpensively submit their digital works online along with their desired All Rights Reserved or Creative Commons license and receive a verifiable Numly Number and HTML that can be embedded into your work to prove your copyright.  </p>
<p>Numly Numbers are linked back to Numly&#039;s database to provide third party, non-repudiation services and time stamps of submitted works and meta data associated with the copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-122917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-122917</guid>
		<description>&quot;Basically, as long as a few people cling to the myth, it will likely be worth addressing.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This applies to so many situations in life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Basically, as long as a few people cling to the myth, it will likely be worth addressing.&#8221;</p>
<p>This applies to so many situations in life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/11/22/why-use-copyright-notices/comment-page-1/#comment-27327</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McGuinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=377#comment-27327</guid>
		<description>&quot;Basically, as long as a few people cling to the myth, it will likely be worth addressing.&quot; 
 
This applies to so many situations in life... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Basically, as long as a few people cling to the myth, it will likely be worth addressing.&quot;</p>
<p>This applies to so many situations in life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 16:17:26 -->
