<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Scrape?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: seolinkpro</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-129092</link> <dc:creator>seolinkpro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:37:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-129092</guid> <description>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seolinkpro</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-128075</link> <dc:creator>seolinkpro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-128075</guid> <description>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seolinkpro</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-125915</link> <dc:creator>seolinkpro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:37:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-125915</guid> <description>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, because its Soooooooo easy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-123174</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-123174</guid> <description>I agree that you can&#039;t control it but you can do a great deal to mitigate against it by including digital fingerprints to track it and using the inbound links to point to your own site. Glad you liked the article!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that you can&#39;t control it but you can do a great deal to mitigate against it by including digital fingerprints to track it and using the inbound links to point to your own site. Glad you liked the article!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Justin Hitt</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-123173</link> <dc:creator>Justin Hitt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-123173</guid> <description>While you really can&#039;t control what Google or scraper sites do, you can format your content to provide links back to your site.  The quality will be low, but if a prospect stumbles across your content, they may come back to your site on the next visit.  Thanks for the ideas, anything that keeps revenue in my pocket is appreciated.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you really can&#39;t control what Google or scraper sites do, you can format your content to provide links back to your site.  The quality will be low, but if a prospect stumbles across your content, they may come back to your site on the next visit.  Thanks for the ideas, anything that keeps revenue in my pocket is appreciated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-20856</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-20856</guid> <description>The problem really isn&#039;t setting up a new network that caters only to the best of sites. Many networks are doing that right now. The problem is getting enough of both the advertisers and the publishers to reach critical mass. Google was able to do that easily due to their background, others have struggled.I fooled around with Adwords some recently and was AMAZED at how much people pay for clicks through Google. It&#039;s insane at times.The price on this is going to have to come down, especially with all of the fraud, it&#039;s too easy to make a free living off of spamming.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem really isn&#8217;t setting up a new network that caters only to the best of sites. Many networks are doing that right now. The problem is getting enough of both the advertisers and the publishers to reach critical mass. Google was able to do that easily due to their background, others have struggled.</p><p>I fooled around with Adwords some recently and was AMAZED at how much people pay for clicks through Google. It&#8217;s insane at times.</p><p>The price on this is going to have to come down, especially with all of the fraud, it&#8217;s too easy to make a free living off of spamming.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JB</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-122200</link> <dc:creator>JB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-122200</guid> <description>The problem really isn&#039;t setting up a new network that caters only to the best of sites. Many networks are doing that right now. The problem is getting enough of both the advertisers and the publishers to reach critical mass. Google was able to do that easily due to their background, others have struggled. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I fooled around with Adwords some recently and was AMAZED at how much people pay for clicks through Google. It&#039;s insane at times. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The price on this is going to have to come down, especially with all of the fraud, it&#039;s too easy to make a free living off of spamming.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem really isn&#8217;t setting up a new network that caters only to the best of sites. Many networks are doing that right now. The problem is getting enough of both the advertisers and the publishers to reach critical mass. Google was able to do that easily due to their background, others have struggled.</p><p>I fooled around with Adwords some recently and was AMAZED at how much people pay for clicks through Google. It&#8217;s insane at times.</p><p>The price on this is going to have to come down, especially with all of the fraud, it&#8217;s too easy to make a free living off of spamming.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MaxPower</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-20851</link> <dc:creator>MaxPower</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-20851</guid> <description>It seems to me that Google is going to have to revisit the Adsense game.  With so many millions of pages of generated and scraped content existing solely for the purpose of creating money off of waylayed Internet searchers, advertisers are going to get fed up with increasingly diminishing returns.Sooner or later someone is going to come up with an Advertising product / service that only accepts quality sites of real utility.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Google is going to have to revisit the Adsense game.  With so many millions of pages of generated and scraped content existing solely for the purpose of creating money off of waylayed Internet searchers, advertisers are going to get fed up with increasingly diminishing returns.</p><p>Sooner or later someone is going to come up with an Advertising product / service that only accepts quality sites of real utility.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MaxPower</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/20/why-scrape/comment-page-1/#comment-122199</link> <dc:creator>MaxPower</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=359#comment-122199</guid> <description>It seems to me that Google is going to have to revisit the Adsense game.  With so many millions of pages of generated and scraped content existing solely for the purpose of creating money off of waylayed Internet searchers, advertisers are going to get fed up with increasingly diminishing returns. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sooner or later someone is going to come up with an Advertising product / service that only accepts quality sites of real utility.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Google is going to have to revisit the Adsense game.  With so many millions of pages of generated and scraped content existing solely for the purpose of creating money off of waylayed Internet searchers, advertisers are going to get fed up with increasingly diminishing returns.</p><p>Sooner or later someone is going to come up with an Advertising product / service that only accepts quality sites of real utility.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-18 19:49:42 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      18
Cached queries:     3
Total query time:   0.015
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.006 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2006' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='10' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='20' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'why-scrape' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '359' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (359) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (359)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-07-10 01:37:39'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-07-09 21:37:39'
   12 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2009-07-09 20:37:39'
   13 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-08-28 19:48:22'
   14 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-08-28 14:03:37'
   15 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-20 19:33:57'
   16 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-20 19:33:57'
   17 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-20 19:12:10'
   18 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 359 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-20 19:12:10'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_1dd9b9e0b6919fbec140cd9782ea87c2
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.492s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 GMT
ETag:               "c2f9cd86c24cda3b43d77e39b7d48669"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->