<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One DMCA Notice or Twenty? - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-123298</link>
		<dc:creator>One DMCA Notice or Twenty? - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-123298</guid>
		<description>[...] there is no correct answer. Though you can definitely mention multiple works in the same notice, including several hundred if you see fit, there is no way to tell which approach is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is no correct answer. Though you can definitely mention multiple works in the same notice, including several hundred if you see fit, there is no way to tell which approach is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting developments &#8230; &#171; Stop bitacle.org</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20654</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting developments &#8230; &#171; Stop bitacle.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20654</guid>
		<description>[...] PlagiarismToday: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlagiarismToday: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20240</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20240</guid>
		<description>Plain Jane Mom,

I&#039;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#039;s to come. 

Still waiting on a word from Google.

As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#039;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.

In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#039;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#039;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.

If they don&#039;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#039;s my hunch. 

Of course, I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain Jane Mom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#8217;s to come. </p>
<p>Still waiting on a word from Google.</p>
<p>As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#8217;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.</p>
<p>In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#8217;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#8217;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#8217;s my hunch. </p>
<p>Of course, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-122927</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-122927</guid>
		<description>Plain Jane Mom,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#039;s to come. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still waiting on a word from Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#039;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#039;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#039;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they don&#039;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#039;s my hunch. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain Jane Mom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#8217;s to come. </p>
<p>Still waiting on a word from Google.</p>
<p>As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#8217;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.</p>
<p>In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#8217;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#8217;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#8217;s my hunch. </p>
<p>Of course, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plain Jane Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20236</link>
		<dc:creator>Plain Jane Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20236</guid>
		<description>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.

I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.</p>
<p>I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plain Jane Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-122926</link>
		<dc:creator>Plain Jane Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-122926</guid>
		<description>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.</p>
<p>I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      15
Cached queries:     0
Total query time:   0.010
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2006' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='10' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='17' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '356' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.002 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (356) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (356)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key = '_pprredirect_url'
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2008-09-24 15:47:42'
   11 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-19 14:03:30'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-17 19:12:46'
   13 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-17 19:12:46'
   14 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-17 18:56:16'
   15 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 356 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-10-17 18:56:16'
-->