<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One DMCA Notice or Twenty? - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-123298</link>
		<dc:creator>One DMCA Notice or Twenty? - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-123298</guid>
		<description>[...] there is no correct answer. Though you can definitely mention multiple works in the same notice, including several hundred if you see fit, there is no way to tell which approach is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is no correct answer. Though you can definitely mention multiple works in the same notice, including several hundred if you see fit, there is no way to tell which approach is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting developments &#8230; &#171; Stop bitacle.org</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20654</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting developments &#8230; &#171; Stop bitacle.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20654</guid>
		<description>[...] PlagiarismToday: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlagiarismToday: DMCA From Hell (PDF) and Bitacle Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-122927</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-122927</guid>
		<description>Plain Jane Mom,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#039;s to come. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still waiting on a word from Google.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#039;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#039;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#039;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they don&#039;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#039;s my hunch. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain Jane Mom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#8217;s to come. </p>
<p>Still waiting on a word from Google.</p>
<p>As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#8217;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.</p>
<p>In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#8217;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#8217;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#8217;s my hunch. </p>
<p>Of course, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plain Jane Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-122926</link>
		<dc:creator>Plain Jane Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-122926</guid>
		<description>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.</p>
<p>I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20240</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20240</guid>
		<description>Plain Jane Mom, 
 
I&#039;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#039;s to come.  
 
Still waiting on a word from Google. 
 
As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#039;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear. 
 
In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#039;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#039;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services. 
 
If they don&#039;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#039;s my hunch.  
 
Of course, I could be wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain Jane Mom,</p>
<p>I&#039;m still seeing the ads next to the comment form. However, if Bitacle is a large site it could be that they are removing it piece by piece. What you saw might be a preview of what&#039;s to come. </p>
<p>Still waiting on a word from Google.</p>
<p>As far as who might match their ethics? My gut says to look overseas but no names jump out at me right now. The problem is that the advertisers will likely balk at Bitacle&#039;s practices, making it prudent for an ad network to steer clear.</p>
<p>In that regard, look for advertisers that might bite. Gambling took a huge hit with the U.S. banning online gambling and won&#039;t likely invest, despite Bitacle&#039;s high overseas presence. That only leave pornography and other spammable services.</p>
<p>If they don&#039;t simply try a switch to a new network (and get another beating) or shut down altogether, look for them to shack up with a shady advertising partner or partners. That&#039;s my hunch. </p>
<p>Of course, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plain Jane Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/10/17/dmca-from-hell-pdf-and-bitacle-update/comment-page-1/#comment-20236</link>
		<dc:creator>Plain Jane Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=356#comment-20236</guid>
		<description>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan. 
 
I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#039;s? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see zero ads on my posts on bitacle. Nice work, Jonathan.</p>
<p>I wonder who they will partner with next for their advertising? Any ideas about advertising companies whose ethics match bitacle&#039;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 21:35:58 -->
