<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Technorati a Scraper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday - Spammers Want Your Content &#124; ISTP Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-32941</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday - Spammers Want Your Content &#124; ISTP Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-32941</guid>
		<description>[...] I was going to write about this today, but Googling for similar pages shows it&#8217;s been well discussed by Plagiarism Today here and here months ago. I am convinced that spammers&#8217; use of Technorati is mainly to blame for problems I&#8217;ve been having. Specifically I blame the tagging feature. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was going to write about this today, but Googling for similar pages shows it&#8217;s been well discussed by Plagiarism Today here and here months ago. I am convinced that spammers&#8217; use of Technorati is mainly to blame for problems I&#8217;ve been having. Specifically I blame the tagging feature. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marios Alexandrou</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken to adding the nofollow attribute to my blog&#039;s technorati tags. I figure if they are going to put the attribute on links back to my site, then I might as well too. No need to &quot;boost&quot; their site without a return favor.

Two things I still need to work out are:

1) Will the nofollow attribute apply to Technorati&#039;s spider?

2) If I don&#039;t actually get much traffic from Technorati then is there any point in having the tags at all on my site?

Lastly, if you happen to be using the Simpletags Wordpress plugin for this site, it&#039;s a quick change to add the nofollow code in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken to adding the nofollow attribute to my blog&#8217;s technorati tags. I figure if they are going to put the attribute on links back to my site, then I might as well too. No need to &#8220;boost&#8221; their site without a return favor.</p>
<p>Two things I still need to work out are:</p>
<p>1) Will the nofollow attribute apply to Technorati&#8217;s spider?</p>
<p>2) If I don&#8217;t actually get much traffic from Technorati then is there any point in having the tags at all on my site?</p>
<p>Lastly, if you happen to be using the Simpletags WordPress plugin for this site, it&#8217;s a quick change to add the nofollow code in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marios Alexandrou</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-123074</link>
		<dc:creator>Marios Alexandrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-123074</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken to adding the nofollow attribute to my blog&#039;s technorati tags. I figure if they are going to put the attribute on links back to my site, then I might as well too. No need to &quot;boost&quot; their site without a return favor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two things I still need to work out are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Will the nofollow attribute apply to Technorati&#039;s spider?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) If I don&#039;t actually get much traffic from Technorati then is there any point in having the tags at all on my site?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lastly, if you happen to be using the Simpletags Wordpress plugin for this site, it&#039;s a quick change to add the nofollow code in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve taken to adding the nofollow attribute to my blog&#39;s technorati tags. I figure if they are going to put the attribute on links back to my site, then I might as well too. No need to &#8220;boost&#8221; their site without a return favor.</p>
<p>Two things I still need to work out are:</p>
<p>1) Will the nofollow attribute apply to Technorati&#39;s spider?</p>
<p>2) If I don&#39;t actually get much traffic from Technorati then is there any point in having the tags at all on my site?</p>
<p>Lastly, if you happen to be using the Simpletags WordPress plugin for this site, it&#39;s a quick change to add the nofollow code in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-4914</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-4914</guid>
		<description>Just taking a guess here, but AFAIK is every outgoing link from a site dropping the PR bit by bit, every incoming link is rising it. The more relevance the linktext as well as the pointing site has, the more effect does it have on the PR.

So if Technorati decides on one hand to robot-nofollow their own sites as well as all outgoing links and on the other hand add a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; to each and every link, I&#039;d say it sounds as if they try to raise the PR for the main site. Or, the other way round, the try to avoid getting the PR dropped bit by bit by providing outgoing links. 

Which way you put it, the result is the same, as this way, the PR gets &quot;stolen&quot; from those who&#039;re linking to Technorati, but get nothing in return. It&#039;s the socialising and link/blogrolling which made blogging into what it is today. It&#039;s ironic that &quot;socialising services&quot; now start to shave those off who &quot;made&quot; them.

At least there&#039;s coming a half-decent share of traffic from Technorati. Even if some of my blogs won&#039;t get pinged anymore for some reason I don&#039;t understand. And even if you&#039;re never ever getting an answer from their support. :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just taking a guess here, but AFAIK is every outgoing link from a site dropping the PR bit by bit, every incoming link is rising it. The more relevance the linktext as well as the pointing site has, the more effect does it have on the PR.</p>
<p>So if Technorati decides on one hand to robot-nofollow their own sites as well as all outgoing links and on the other hand add a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to each and every link, I&#8217;d say it sounds as if they try to raise the PR for the main site. Or, the other way round, the try to avoid getting the PR dropped bit by bit by providing outgoing links. </p>
<p>Which way you put it, the result is the same, as this way, the PR gets &#8220;stolen&#8221; from those who&#8217;re linking to Technorati, but get nothing in return. It&#8217;s the socialising and link/blogrolling which made blogging into what it is today. It&#8217;s ironic that &#8220;socialising services&#8221; now start to shave those off who &#8220;made&#8221; them.</p>
<p>At least there&#8217;s coming a half-decent share of traffic from Technorati. Even if some of my blogs won&#8217;t get pinged anymore for some reason I don&#8217;t understand. And even if you&#8217;re never ever getting an answer from their support. :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-123073</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-123073</guid>
		<description>Just taking a guess here, but AFAIK is every outgoing link from a site dropping the PR bit by bit, every incoming link is rising it. The more relevance the linktext as well as the pointing site has, the more effect does it have on the PR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So if Technorati decides on one hand to robot-nofollow their own sites as well as all outgoing links and on the other hand add a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; to each and every link, I&#039;d say it sounds as if they try to raise the PR for the main site. Or, the other way round, the try to avoid getting the PR dropped bit by bit by providing outgoing links. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which way you put it, the result is the same, as this way, the PR gets &quot;stolen&quot; from those who&#039;re linking to Technorati, but get nothing in return. It&#039;s the socialising and link/blogrolling which made blogging into what it is today. It&#039;s ironic that &quot;socialising services&quot; now start to shave those off who &quot;made&quot; them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least there&#039;s coming a half-decent share of traffic from Technorati. Even if some of my blogs won&#039;t get pinged anymore for some reason I don&#039;t understand. And even if you&#039;re never ever getting an answer from their support. :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just taking a guess here, but AFAIK is every outgoing link from a site dropping the PR bit by bit, every incoming link is rising it. The more relevance the linktext as well as the pointing site has, the more effect does it have on the PR.</p>
<p>So if Technorati decides on one hand to robot-nofollow their own sites as well as all outgoing links and on the other hand add a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to each and every link, I&#39;d say it sounds as if they try to raise the PR for the main site. Or, the other way round, the try to avoid getting the PR dropped bit by bit by providing outgoing links. </p>
<p>Which way you put it, the result is the same, as this way, the PR gets &#8220;stolen&#8221; from those who&#39;re linking to Technorati, but get nothing in return. It&#39;s the socialising and link/blogrolling which made blogging into what it is today. It&#39;s ironic that &#8220;socialising services&#8221; now start to shave those off who &#8220;made&#8221; them.</p>
<p>At least there&#39;s coming a half-decent share of traffic from Technorati. Even if some of my blogs won&#39;t get pinged anymore for some reason I don&#39;t understand. And even if you&#39;re never ever getting an answer from their support. :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxpower</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>maxpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some theorize that search engines penalize sites with large collections of outgoing links, some might say it&#039;s a sign of hostility between the blog search engines and the traditional ones, and a few go as far as to say that it&#039;s proof the blog search engines are engaging in scraper-like activity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can&#039;t believe that technorati or icerocket need to ensure good placement in the Google Serps.  Who searches for &#039;blog search&#039; or whatever.  Heck, I can&#039;t even remember a time where I searched for something and a technorati or icerocket link came up.  

A couple months ago now, I removed nofollow from my website and as far as I can tell I haven&#039;t been smited by the search engines.  

I personally think that other websites use nofollow when linking to blogs to remove bloggers influence on the search engine results.  Effectively, by using no follow we (they) are muting the blogosphere&#039;s (bleh) collective voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some theorize that search engines penalize sites with large collections of outgoing links, some might say it&#8217;s a sign of hostility between the blog search engines and the traditional ones, and a few go as far as to say that it&#8217;s proof the blog search engines are engaging in scraper-like activity.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe that technorati or icerocket need to ensure good placement in the Google Serps.  Who searches for &#8216;blog search&#8217; or whatever.  Heck, I can&#8217;t even remember a time where I searched for something and a technorati or icerocket link came up.  </p>
<p>A couple months ago now, I removed nofollow from my website and as far as I can tell I haven&#8217;t been smited by the search engines.  </p>
<p>I personally think that other websites use nofollow when linking to blogs to remove bloggers influence on the search engine results.  Effectively, by using no follow we (they) are muting the blogosphere&#8217;s (bleh) collective voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxpower</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/06/19/is-technorati-a-scraper/comment-page-1/#comment-123072</link>
		<dc:creator>maxpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=269#comment-123072</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some theorize that search engines penalize sites with large collections of outgoing links, some might say it&#039;s a sign of hostility between the blog search engines and the traditional ones, and a few go as far as to say that it&#039;s proof the blog search engines are engaging in scraper-like activity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t believe that technorati or icerocket need to ensure good placement in the Google Serps.  Who searches for &#039;blog search&#039; or whatever.  Heck, I can&#039;t even remember a time where I searched for something and a technorati or icerocket link came up.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A couple months ago now, I removed nofollow from my website and as far as I can tell I haven&#039;t been smited by the search engines.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally think that other websites use nofollow when linking to blogs to remove bloggers influence on the search engine results.  Effectively, by using no follow we (they) are muting the blogosphere&#039;s (bleh) collective voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some theorize that search engines penalize sites with large collections of outgoing links, some might say it&#39;s a sign of hostility between the blog search engines and the traditional ones, and a few go as far as to say that it&#39;s proof the blog search engines are engaging in scraper-like activity.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#39;t believe that technorati or icerocket need to ensure good placement in the Google Serps.  Who searches for &#39;blog search&#39; or whatever.  Heck, I can&#39;t even remember a time where I searched for something and a technorati or icerocket link came up.  </p>
<p>A couple months ago now, I removed nofollow from my website and as far as I can tell I haven&#39;t been smited by the search engines.  </p>
<p>I personally think that other websites use nofollow when linking to blogs to remove bloggers influence on the search engine results.  Effectively, by using no follow we (they) are muting the blogosphere&#39;s (bleh) collective voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 15:42:43 -->
