<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The &#8216;New&#8217; Plagiarism&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zach van Draden</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-28138</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach van Draden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-28138</guid>
		<description>Is it really that much to ask when we say, &quot;in your own words?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really that much to ask when we say, &#8220;in your own words?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach van Draden</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-121138</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach van Draden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-121138</guid>
		<description>Is it really that much to ask when we say, &quot;in your own words?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really that much to ask when we say, &#8220;in your own words?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>Paragonshop.com-All new Jordan Sneakers Michael Jordan Shoes p7vRzPEY 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;replica handbags&lt;/a&gt;
http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paragonshop.com-All new Jordan Sneakers Michael Jordan Shoes p7vRzPEY<br />
<a href="http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com" rel="nofollow">replica handbags</a><br />
<a href="http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com" rel="nofollow">http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-121137</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-121137</guid>
		<description>Paragonshop.com-All new Jordan Sneakers Michael Jordan Shoes p7vRzPEY &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;replica handbags&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com&quot;&gt;http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paragonshop.com-All new Jordan Sneakers Michael Jordan Shoes p7vRzPEY <br /><a href="http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com" rel="nofollow">replica handbags</a><br /><a href="http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com">http://jordan-sneakers.jamminweb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never Tell&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-06-01</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>Never Tell&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-06-01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3799</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlagiarismToday Â» â€œThe â€˜Newâ€™ Plagiarismâ€? â€œThe â€˜Newâ€™ Plagiarismâ€? (tags: toread) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feed My Pet Brain &#187; Thoughts on aggregation and plagiarism</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Feed My Pet Brain &#187; Thoughts on aggregation and plagiarism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>[...] Following up on the new plagiarism, I wonder if the framework might expand to include another point - the degree to which the aggregate content provides a filtered (in an information overload sense) view of the topic. Does the site provide an expert&#8217;s, or amateur&#8217;s (which can be equally useful), view of the important resources? Here, blogs are the tool of &#8216;the mentat&#8217; in Herbert&#8217;s (Dune) and Hunter&#8217;s (World Without Secrets) worlds.&#160; Well maybe not Herbert&#039;s as blogs approach &quot;likeness of the human mind&quot; in a Doctorow sense anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following up on the new plagiarism, I wonder if the framework might expand to include another point &#8211; the degree to which the aggregate content provides a filtered (in an information overload sense) view of the topic. Does the site provide an expert&rsquo;s, or amateur&rsquo;s (which can be equally useful), view of the important resources? Here, blogs are the tool of &lsquo;the mentat&rsquo; in Herbert&rsquo;s (Dune) and Hunter&rsquo;s (World Without Secrets) worlds.&nbsp; Well maybe not Herbert&#39;s as blogs approach &quot;likeness of the human mind&quot; in a Doctorow sense anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zrlnd / Bloggers: thieves, hacks or journalists?</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>zrlnd / Bloggers: thieves, hacks or journalists?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3619</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hawkwings made an excellent article on the subject, and plagiarismtoday.com is running this article â€œThe â€˜Newâ€™ Plagiarismâ€? which has, I think, some quite subtle points of view. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Tentacle Monster &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PlagiarismToday Â» â€œThe â€˜Newâ€™ Plagiarismâ€?</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Tentacle Monster &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PlagiarismToday Â» â€œThe â€˜Newâ€™ Plagiarismâ€?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 00:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>[...] PlagiarismToday &#187; &#8220;The &#8216;New&#8217; Plagiarism&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PlagiarismToday &#187; &#8220;The &#8216;New&#8217; Plagiarism&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bloggers: Thieves, hacks or journos?</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3593</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bloggers: Thieves, hacks or journos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 14:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3593</guid>
		<description>[...] First, Jonathan Bailey at Plagiarism Today posted a thoughtful piece  on bloggers, intellectual property and plagiarism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, Jonathan Bailey at Plagiarism Today posted a thoughtful piece  on bloggers, intellectual property and plagiarism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nortypig</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/05/10/the-new-plagiarism/comment-page-2/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>nortypig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 00:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=238#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>I agree all authors are derivers as well...

Who wrote the first 10 Ways to Improve SEO for example - I&#039;ve read quite a number. Did those people perhaps absorb it from the atmosphere? Yet none of them to my memory said they learned that on another blog. Its a valid example.

I have to say I would find it very hard ever to say exactly where what I&#039;ve heard becomes my own opinion. Mind you I was a writer before being a blogger so am well aware of how parts of things soup away in a bubbling brew and come out as something original. Or originalish.

Yes I like Joseph&#039;s point and have made it myself to a lesser extent in the past. Quite a few articles on professional blogging sites seem to be a circuitous rehash of the same information which may have begun on Micro Persuasion or somewhere else.

Its kind of icky when you think of it? Human aggregators or programatical is probably irrelevant.

I&#039;m for a free blogosphere where conversation and the sharing of knowledge are more important than click through revenue... on blogs at least.

Is either side of the debate right though? Mmm I probably think the truth and the path are in that grey area you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree all authors are derivers as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Who wrote the first 10 Ways to Improve SEO for example &#8211; I&#8217;ve read quite a number. Did those people perhaps absorb it from the atmosphere? Yet none of them to my memory said they learned that on another blog. Its a valid example.</p>
<p>I have to say I would find it very hard ever to say exactly where what I&#8217;ve heard becomes my own opinion. Mind you I was a writer before being a blogger so am well aware of how parts of things soup away in a bubbling brew and come out as something original. Or originalish.</p>
<p>Yes I like Joseph&#8217;s point and have made it myself to a lesser extent in the past. Quite a few articles on professional blogging sites seem to be a circuitous rehash of the same information which may have begun on Micro Persuasion or somewhere else.</p>
<p>Its kind of icky when you think of it? Human aggregators or programatical is probably irrelevant.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m for a free blogosphere where conversation and the sharing of knowledge are more important than click through revenue&#8230; on blogs at least.</p>
<p>Is either side of the debate right though? Mmm I probably think the truth and the path are in that grey area you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_916e3e787ad4516f08c8c533c7ed629b
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      page caching is disabled
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      1.266s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:10:48 GMT
ETag:               "f87f9e6ffefebb165264678d5dd30e02"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->