Comments on: CMI: Copyright Managent Information http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:06:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Image Watermark Hijacking | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-129787 Image Watermark Hijacking | PlagiarismToday Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:29:46 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-129787 [...] would be that, in the U.S. under the DMCA, hijacking a watermark would constitute removal of Copyright Management Information (CMI) and such infringements can accrue significant damages, even if the work is not registered. [...] [...] would be that, in the U.S. under the DMCA, hijacking a watermark would constitute removal of Copyright Management Information (CMI) and such infringements can accrue significant damages, even if the work is not registered. [...]

]]> By: Why You Should License Your Work | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-125829 Why You Should License Your Work | PlagiarismToday Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:54:42 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-125829 [...] addition, depending on how the license is affixed to the work, it may be considered copyright management information (CMI), which adds another avenue for a lawsuit, should an infringement rise to that, and it can be [...] [...] addition, depending on how the license is affixed to the work, it may be considered copyright management information (CMI), which adds another avenue for a lawsuit, should an infringement rise to that, and it can be [...]

]]> By: C-Registry: Orphan Work Prevention | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-125450 C-Registry: Orphan Work Prevention | PlagiarismToday Tue, 05 May 2009 19:26:17 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-125450 [...] or image. Though they can be easily removed, knowingly doing so for malicious purposes is a violation under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and can be sued [...] [...] or image. Though they can be easily removed, knowingly doing so for malicious purposes is a violation under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and can be sued [...]

]]> By: 3 Count: CMIdea | PlagiarismTodayhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-125107 3 Count: CMIdea | PlagiarismToday Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:42:06 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-125107 [...] of the elements of the AP’s counterclaims against Fairey includes a mention of stripping out Copyright Management Information [...] [...] of the elements of the AP’s counterclaims against Fairey includes a mention of stripping out Copyright Management Information [...]

]]> By: maxpowerhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-1328 maxpower Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:28:43 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-1328 "... it is illegal to remove copyright information affixed to a work or to provide false information before distributing it to others."Very solid post. With reference to the above quote from your story, if someone affixes their copyright to someone else's work, they violate the DMCA right? Does this mean that if I find some random site on the web claiming something as being copyrighted by them when in fact another party owns the copyright (ug!), that the DMCA can be applied? Irregardless of the true copyright owners awareness? [Crikey this legal talk makes the english language so rigid!] “… it is illegal to remove copyright information affixed to a work or to provide false information before distributing it to others.”

Very solid post. With reference to the above quote from your story, if someone affixes their copyright to someone else’s work, they violate the DMCA right? Does this mean that if I find some random site on the web claiming something as being copyrighted by them when in fact another party owns the copyright (ug!), that the DMCA can be applied? Irregardless of the true copyright owners awareness? [Crikey this legal talk makes the english language so rigid!]

]]> By: maxpowerhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/04/26/cmi-copyright-managent-information/comment-page-1/#comment-122490 maxpower Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:28:43 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=228#comment-122490 "... it is illegal to remove copyright information affixed to a work or to provide false information before distributing it to others."<br><br>Very solid post. With reference to the above quote from your story, if someone affixes their copyright to someone else's work, they violate the DMCA right? Does this mean that if I find some random site on the web claiming something as being copyrighted by them when in fact another party owns the copyright (ug!), that the DMCA can be applied? Irregardless of the true copyright owners awareness? [Crikey this legal talk makes the english language so rigid!] “… it is illegal to remove copyright information affixed to a work or to provide false information before distributing it to others.”

Very solid post. With reference to the above quote from your story, if someone affixes their copyright to someone else’s work, they violate the DMCA right? Does this mean that if I find some random site on the web claiming something as being copyrighted by them when in fact another party owns the copyright (ug!), that the DMCA can be applied? Irregardless of the true copyright owners awareness? [Crikey this legal talk makes the english language so rigid!]

]]>