<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Punditry: I&#8217;ve Heard it all Before</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/26/punditry-ive-heard-it-all-before/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/26/punditry-ive-heard-it-all-before/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;Affaire Domenech at blog.matthewstinson.net</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/26/punditry-ive-heard-it-all-before/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;Affaire Domenech at blog.matthewstinson.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=199#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>[...] Postscript (3/27/06 3:40pm):  Though I ended this post with a critique of Domenech&#8217;s critics, some will take it to mean that I feel Domenech did not deserve to lose his job.  On the contrary, for reasons explained here and also highlighted in an excellent post at Plagiarism Today, Domenech&#8217;s plagiarism rendered him unfit to helm a blog at America&#8217;s second-largest newspaper.  Though I think many of Domenech&#8217;s enemies crossed the line in how they attacked him, in retrospect, conservatives, and even Domenech himself, should be thankful that his plagiarism was uncovered so quickly.  Were he not a plagiarist, however, the debate would be very different, and this post would only be half as long.  As such, my advice to anyone wishing to comment here is that they read both halves of the argument presented, rather than blindly choose to enlist me as an ally or target me as an enemy in an online war I wish to be no part of.  Technorati Tags: Ben Domenech blogging conservative infighting plagiarism race Redstate Red America Washington Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Postscript (3/27/06 3:40pm):  Though I ended this post with a critique of Domenech&#8217;s critics, some will take it to mean that I feel Domenech did not deserve to lose his job.  On the contrary, for reasons explained here and also highlighted in an excellent post at Plagiarism Today, Domenech&#8217;s plagiarism rendered him unfit to helm a blog at America&#8217;s second-largest newspaper.  Though I think many of Domenech&#8217;s enemies crossed the line in how they attacked him, in retrospect, conservatives, and even Domenech himself, should be thankful that his plagiarism was uncovered so quickly.  Were he not a plagiarist, however, the debate would be very different, and this post would only be half as long.  As such, my advice to anyone wishing to comment here is that they read both halves of the argument presented, rather than blindly choose to enlist me as an ally or target me as an enemy in an online war I wish to be no part of.  Technorati Tags: Ben Domenech blogging conservative infighting plagiarism race Redstate Red America Washington Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 20:33:30 -->
