<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ben Domenech Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up:Young Author, Ancient Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up:Young Author, Ancient Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>[...] All of this made the Harvard sophomore an almost instant celebrity. However, she&#8217;s now found herself embroiled in the most-talked about plagiarism scandal since the politically-charged Ben Domenech story broke a month ago. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of this made the Harvard sophomore an almost instant celebrity. However, she&#8217;s now found herself embroiled in the most-talked about plagiarism scandal since the politically-charged Ben Domenech story broke a month ago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: Al Franken, Syriana and More</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: Al Franken, Syriana and More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally, I was going to skip this week&#8217;s wrap up column as little plagiarism news seemed to come up before the Tuesday deadline. It seemed that, possibly the Web was a bit tired of discussing the issue after the Domenech and Engadget scandals.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally, I was going to skip this week&#8217;s wrap up column as little plagiarism news seemed to come up before the Tuesday deadline. It seemed that, possibly the Web was a bit tired of discussing the issue after the Domenech and Engadget scandals.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: AP Controversy, Cowherd &#38; More</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: AP Controversy, Cowherd &#38; More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>[...] Plagiarism has been in the news in a major way this week. However, with so much focus on the Ben Domenech scandal that other important plagiarism stories have gone almost unnoticed. Still, there hasn&#8217;t been enough time this week to report everything that&#8217;s been going on so here&#8217;s a look at what else has been happening in plagiarism news on the Web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plagiarism has been in the news in a major way this week. However, with so much focus on the Ben Domenech scandal that other important plagiarism stories have gone almost unnoticed. Still, there hasn&#8217;t been enough time this week to report everything that&#8217;s been going on so here&#8217;s a look at what else has been happening in plagiarism news on the Web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Punditry: I&#8217;ve Heard it all Before</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Punditry: I&#8217;ve Heard it all Before</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-998</guid>
		<description>[...] As I was writing my article on the Ben Domenech scandal, doing my best to make it impartial and present all sides, bloggers were working feverishly to poke holes in Deomenech&#8217;s defense and, more significantly, something was swirling around inside Domenech&#8217;s head. He knew that he had been caught and that the lies he had told the world in his defense would soon be discovered.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I was writing my article on the Ben Domenech scandal, doing my best to make it impartial and present all sides, bloggers were working feverishly to poke holes in Deomenech&#8217;s defense and, more significantly, something was swirling around inside Domenech&#8217;s head. He knew that he had been caught and that the lies he had told the world in his defense would soon be discovered.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balls and Walnuts - dig the frog &#187; Evening linkage</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Balls and Walnuts - dig the frog &#187; Evening linkage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] Post script to the Ben Domenech plagiarism story, from Media Matters: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post script to the Ben Domenech plagiarism story, from Media Matters: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-122883</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-122883</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#039;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &quot;I didn&#039;t do it, my editors did&quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#8217;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t do it, my editors did&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-980</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#039;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &quot;I didn&#039;t do it, my editors did&quot;? 
 
I&#039;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#039;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &quot;I didn&#039;t do it, my editors did&quot;?</p>
<p>I&#039;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 15:52:01 -->
