<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Ben Domenech Scandal</title> <atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/</link> <description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up:Young Author, Ancient Controversy</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up:Young Author, Ancient Controversy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1305</guid> <description>[...] All of this made the Harvard sophomore an almost instant celebrity. However, she&#8217;s now found herself embroiled in the most-talked about plagiarism scandal since the politically-charged Ben Domenech story broke a month ago. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of this made the Harvard sophomore an almost instant celebrity. However, she&#8217;s now found herself embroiled in the most-talked about plagiarism scandal since the politically-charged Ben Domenech story broke a month ago. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: Al Franken, Syriana and More</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: Al Franken, Syriana and More</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1081</guid> <description>[...] Originally, I was going to skip this week&#8217;s wrap up column as little plagiarism news seemed to come up before the Tuesday deadline. It seemed that, possibly the Web was a bit tired of discussing the issue after the Domenech and Engadget scandals.&#160; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally, I was going to skip this week&#8217;s wrap up column as little plagiarism news seemed to come up before the Tuesday deadline. It seemed that, possibly the Web was a bit tired of discussing the issue after the Domenech and Engadget scandals.&nbsp; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: AP Controversy, Cowherd &#38; More</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Wrap Up: AP Controversy, Cowherd &#38; More</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:45:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-1026</guid> <description>[...] Plagiarism has been in the news in a major way this week. However, with so much focus on the Ben Domenech scandal that other important plagiarism stories have gone almost unnoticed. Still, there hasn&#8217;t been enough time this week to report everything that&#8217;s been going on so here&#8217;s a look at what else has been happening in plagiarism news on the Web. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plagiarism has been in the news in a major way this week. However, with so much focus on the Ben Domenech scandal that other important plagiarism stories have gone almost unnoticed. Still, there hasn&#8217;t been enough time this week to report everything that&#8217;s been going on so here&#8217;s a look at what else has been happening in plagiarism news on the Web. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Punditry: I&#8217;ve Heard it all Before</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link> <dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Punditry: I&#8217;ve Heard it all Before</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-998</guid> <description>[...] As I was writing my article on the Ben Domenech scandal, doing my best to make it impartial and present all sides, bloggers were working feverishly to poke holes in Deomenech&#8217;s defense and, more significantly, something was swirling around inside Domenech&#8217;s head. He knew that he had been caught and that the lies he had told the world in his defense would soon be discovered.&#160; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I was writing my article on the Ben Domenech scandal, doing my best to make it impartial and present all sides, bloggers were working feverishly to poke holes in Deomenech&#8217;s defense and, more significantly, something was swirling around inside Domenech&#8217;s head. He knew that he had been caught and that the lies he had told the world in his defense would soon be discovered.&nbsp; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Balls and Walnuts - dig the frog &#187; Evening linkage</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link> <dc:creator>Balls and Walnuts - dig the frog &#187; Evening linkage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:08:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-981</guid> <description>[...] Post script to the Ben Domenech plagiarism story, from Media Matters: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post script to the Ben Domenech plagiarism story, from Media Matters: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Hoffman</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link> <dc:creator>Doug Hoffman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-980</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#039;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &quot;I didn&#039;t do it, my editors did&quot;?I&#039;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#8217;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t do it, my editors did&#8221;?</p><p>I&#8217;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Hoffman</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2006/03/24/the-ben-domenech-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-122883</link> <dc:creator>Doug Hoffman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=198#comment-122883</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#039;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &quot;I didn&#039;t do it, my editors did&quot;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200603240015" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> has rebutted at least a part of Domenech&#8217;s defense. And, am I correct in understanding that his defense is, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t do it, my editors did&#8221;?</p><p>I&#8217;m having a hard time believing this guy. What makes more sense: more than one rogue editor, or one rogue author?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk
Group:              single
JavaScript info:
   Location     |    Last modified    |         Size | Path
  include-nb    | 2010-03-18 19:49:42 |          422 | http://files.plagiarismtoday.com/scripts/dropdowns.js (/home/plagiari/public_html/wp-content/w3tc/min/minify_eee85f9a0229376e1be9e983e2ebaced.js)
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: CDN debug info:
Engine:             cf
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Total queries:      16
Cached queries:     1
Total query time:   0.010
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'aiosp_post_title_format' LIMIT 1
    3 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SHOW TABLES LIKE 'wp_feedfooter_rss_map'
    4 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    5 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND YEAR(wp_posts.post_date)='2006' AND MONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='3' AND DAYOFMONTH(wp_posts.post_date)='24' AND wp_posts.post_name = 'the-ben-domenech-scandal' AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    6 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '198' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    7 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag') AND tr.object_id IN (198) ORDER BY t.name ASC
    8 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (198)
    9 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT post_id, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_url' and post_id in (SELECT post_id FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key='_pprredirect_active')
   10 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-04-27 19:46:06'
   11 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-04-07 13:56:34'
   12 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-03-30 01:45:22'
   13 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-03-27 03:52:32'
   14 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-03-25 05:08:17'
   15 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-03-25 05:06:00'
   16 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT COUNT(comment_ID) FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = 198 AND comment_parent = 0 AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_date_gmt < '2006-03-25 04:06:00'
-->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_38f83a8a91137b00579cf1daa7aafb07_page_da88aab0e43a0949cc39990fc3235ced
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      user agent is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.465s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:21:04 GMT
ETag:               "c2f9cd86c24cda3b43d77e39b7d48669"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->