Comments on: Plagiarism 2006: A Preview http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/12/31/plagiarism-2006-a-preview/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:49:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Unangsthttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/12/31/plagiarism-2006-a-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-471 Unangst Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:26:10 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=151#comment-471 A number of years ago, I created a Plagiarism Search Engine after I stumbled across a number of cheating students in another district building. For some reason, I decided that it would be fun to create a search engine plugin for the same plagiarism search. If you have Firefox you can grab the plagiarism plugin: http://www.1hs.org/blog/?p=23 A number of years ago, I created a Plagiarism Search Engine after I stumbled across a number of cheating students in another district building. For some reason, I decided that it would be fun to create a search engine plugin for the same plagiarism search. If you have Firefox you can grab the plagiarism plugin: http://www.1hs.org/blog/?p=23

]]> By: Unangsthttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/12/31/plagiarism-2006-a-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-122649 Unangst Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:26:10 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=151#comment-122649 A number of years ago, I created a Plagiarism Search Engine after I stumbled across a number of cheating students in another district building. For some reason, I decided that it would be fun to create a search engine plugin for the same plagiarism search. If you have Firefox you can grab the plagiarism plugin: <a href="http://www.1hs.org/blog/?p=23">http://www.1hs.org/blog/?p=23</a> A number of years ago, I created a Plagiarism Search Engine after I stumbled across a number of cheating students in another district building. For some reason, I decided that it would be fun to create a search engine plugin for the same plagiarism search. If you have Firefox you can grab the plagiarism plugin: http://www.1hs.org/blog/?p=23

]]> By: Plagiarism Checker creator - Darren Homhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/12/31/plagiarism-2006-a-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Plagiarism Checker creator - Darren Hom Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:18:51 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=151#comment-394 I've read several sides to this issue, since I'm a member on a number of Web development and SEO boards. People sell programs that obtain content by scraping other sites and offer this as "easy content" for a fee. In response, Google clamps down on duplicate content and sometimes excludes the original sites' content in favor of the plagiarizers'. Then people try to get on Google's case about this because of lost traffic. In the end, we all lose, since Google will eventually ban the plagiarizers, legitimate Web masters will lose traffic, and Google will spend millions of dollars trying to develop better algorithms.Human nature sure is rotten, but hopefully more of us will decide to do something about it. :) I’ve read several sides to this issue, since I’m a member on a number of Web development and SEO boards. People sell programs that obtain content by scraping other sites and offer this as “easy content” for a fee. In response, Google clamps down on duplicate content and sometimes excludes the original sites’ content in favor of the plagiarizers’. Then people try to get on Google’s case about this because of lost traffic. In the end, we all lose, since Google will eventually ban the plagiarizers, legitimate Web masters will lose traffic, and Google will spend millions of dollars trying to develop better algorithms.

Human nature sure is rotten, but hopefully more of us will decide to do something about it. :)

]]> By: Plagiarism Checker creator - Dhttp://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/12/31/plagiarism-2006-a-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-122648 Plagiarism Checker creator - D Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:18:51 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=151#comment-122648 I've read several sides to this issue, since I'm a member on a number of Web development and SEO boards. People sell programs that obtain content by scraping other sites and offer this as "easy content" for a fee. In response, Google clamps down on duplicate content and sometimes excludes the original sites' content in favor of the plagiarizers'. Then people try to get on Google's case about this because of lost traffic. In the end, we all lose, since Google will eventually ban the plagiarizers, legitimate Web masters will lose traffic, and Google will spend millions of dollars trying to develop better algorithms.<br><br>Human nature sure is rotten, but hopefully more of us will decide to do something about it. :) I’ve read several sides to this issue, since I’m a member on a number of Web development and SEO boards. People sell programs that obtain content by scraping other sites and offer this as “easy content” for a fee. In response, Google clamps down on duplicate content and sometimes excludes the original sites’ content in favor of the plagiarizers’. Then people try to get on Google’s case about this because of lost traffic. In the end, we all lose, since Google will eventually ban the plagiarizers, legitimate Web masters will lose traffic, and Google will spend millions of dollars trying to develop better algorithms.

Human nature sure is rotten, but hopefully more of us will decide to do something about it. :)

]]>