<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Fans Infringe Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/</link>
	<description>Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fans and Copyright Issues - PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-123219</link>
		<dc:creator>Fans and Copyright Issues - PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=123#comment-123219</guid>
		<description>[...] 2005 when a fan of the Applegeeks Webcomic, Chris Davis, tired of waiting for a printed version and created his own, printing it using an online publisher. Though just one copy of the book was made, this resulted in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2005 when a fan of the Applegeeks Webcomic, Chris Davis, tired of waiting for a printed version and created his own, printing it using an online publisher. Though just one copy of the book was made, this resulted in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=123#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Unfortunately, that is simply not true. I strongly encourage you to check out these links for examples of fan fiction sites getting taken down for copyright violations:

http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/
http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html (check section 2.1 annd 2.2)

Anyone who knows their way around copyright law knows that all incidents of fan fiction are, technically, unlawful derivative works. It&#039;s not that they&#039;re copyright non physical elements, technically only the story itself is copyrighted, but copyright law protects the non physical elements of the story.

I&#039;m sorry, the law does not favor your perspective and both t he 2nd and 9th circuit have said so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that is simply not true. I strongly encourage you to check out these links for examples of fan fiction sites getting taken down for copyright violations:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html</a> (check section 2.1 annd 2.2)</p>
<p>Anyone who knows their way around copyright law knows that all incidents of fan fiction are, technically, unlawful derivative works. It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re copyright non physical elements, technically only the story itself is copyrighted, but copyright law protects the non physical elements of the story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, the law does not favor your perspective and both t he 2nd and 9th circuit have said so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-123042</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=123#comment-123042</guid>
		<description>Joe,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, that is simply not true. I strongly encourage you to check out these links for examples of fan fiction sites getting taken down for copyright violations:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/&quot;&gt;http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html&quot;&gt;http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html&lt;/a&gt; (check section 2.1 annd 2.2)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone who knows their way around copyright law knows that all incidents of fan fiction are, technically, unlawful derivative works. It&#039;s not that they&#039;re copyright non physical elements, technically only the story itself is copyrighted, but copyright law protects the non physical elements of the story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sorry, the law does not favor your perspective and both t he 2nd and 9th circuit have said so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that is simply not true. I strongly encourage you to check out these links for examples of fan fiction sites getting taken down for copyright violations:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/">http://www.chillingeffects.org/fanfic/</a><br /><a href="http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html">http://www.whoosh.org/issue25/lee1.html</a> (check section 2.1 annd 2.2)</p>
<p>Anyone who knows their way around copyright law knows that all incidents of fan fiction are, technically, unlawful derivative works. It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re copyright non physical elements, technically only the story itself is copyrighted, but copyright law protects the non physical elements of the story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, the law does not favor your perspective and both t he 2nd and 9th circuit have said so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Szymanski</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-123041</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Szymanski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=123#comment-123041</guid>
		<description>I just want to point out that fan fiction sites are not being shut down because of copyright infringement.  The copyright laws only protect physical things, such as a specific wiriting or a specific painting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You cannot copyright a character.  You cannot copyright a name.  Both of these fall outside of the realm of copyrights.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What fan fiction writing typically break are trademarks. LucasArts owns the trademark to the name Star Wars, and to many famous names like Jedi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo.  By writing a fan fiction, you are break these trademarks, not the copyrights.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Breaking copyrights almost always refers to making a copy of an existing piece of work.  I believe the only other method of breaking copyright is using a selection from a piece of work to create something yourself (ie. sampling or unreferenced direct quotes).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just think that this should be clarified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to point out that fan fiction sites are not being shut down because of copyright infringement.  The copyright laws only protect physical things, such as a specific wiriting or a specific painting.</p>
<p>You cannot copyright a character.  You cannot copyright a name.  Both of these fall outside of the realm of copyrights.</p>
<p>What fan fiction writing typically break are trademarks. LucasArts owns the trademark to the name Star Wars, and to many famous names like Jedi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo.  By writing a fan fiction, you are break these trademarks, not the copyrights.</p>
<p>Breaking copyrights almost always refers to making a copy of an existing piece of work.  I believe the only other method of breaking copyright is using a selection from a piece of work to create something yourself (ie. sampling or unreferenced direct quotes).</p>
<p>I just think that this should be clarified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Szymanski</title>
		<link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/11/14/when-fans-infringe-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Szymanski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=123#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I just want to point out that fan fiction sites are not being shut down because of copyright infringement.  The copyright laws only protect physical things, such as a specific wiriting or a specific painting. 
 
You cannot copyright a character.  You cannot copyright a name.  Both of these fall outside of the realm of copyrights. 
 
What fan fiction writing typically break are trademarks. LucasArts owns the trademark to the name Star Wars, and to many famous names like Jedi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo.  By writing a fan fiction, you are break these trademarks, not the copyrights. 
 
Breaking copyrights almost always refers to making a copy of an existing piece of work.  I believe the only other method of breaking copyright is using a selection from a piece of work to create something yourself (ie. sampling or unreferenced direct quotes). 
 
I just think that this should be clarified. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to point out that fan fiction sites are not being shut down because of copyright infringement.  The copyright laws only protect physical things, such as a specific wiriting or a specific painting.</p>
<p>You cannot copyright a character.  You cannot copyright a name.  Both of these fall outside of the realm of copyrights.</p>
<p>What fan fiction writing typically break are trademarks. LucasArts owns the trademark to the name Star Wars, and to many famous names like Jedi, Luke Skywalker, and Han Solo.  By writing a fan fiction, you are break these trademarks, not the copyrights.</p>
<p>Breaking copyrights almost always refers to making a copy of an existing piece of work.  I believe the only other method of breaking copyright is using a selection from a piece of work to create something yourself (ie. sampling or unreferenced direct quotes).</p>
<p>I just think that this should be clarified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.plagiarismtoday.com @ 2012-02-13 17:01:07 -->
