http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/09/06/the-three-kinds-of-plagiarism-part-one/ Content Theft, Plagiarism, Copyright Infringement Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:59:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/09/06/the-three-kinds-of-plagiarism-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-128690 New Communications Technology Essay « for1501HUM Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:46:39 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=89#comment-128690 [...] language, or writing, when done without proper acknowledgment of the original source,” (The Three Kinds of Plagairism: Part One 2005).  The solution to controlling the distribution of information, media and all creative works [...] [...] language, or writing, when done without proper acknowledgment of the original source,” (The Three Kinds of Plagairism: Part One 2005).  The solution to controlling the distribution of information, media and all creative works [...]

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/09/06/the-three-kinds-of-plagiarism-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-131709 Julian Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:28:00 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=89#comment-131709 I am writing an essay on plagiarism and citations and I believe that the overall idea of plagiarism is rather good. It protects overall ideas of people from being stolen. But then when you get into the nitty gritty, it gets rather shady. Why should we have to site a source if we write a paper or an article about something just because it may seem like a complicated fact? Is there not the rule of common knowledge? Why should we have to cite every fact that is put in a written work? It takes away from our own ability to learn by making us give credit to somone else and making it seem as though we could not know this fact on our own. I am writing an essay on plagiarism and citations and I believe that the overall idea of plagiarism is rather good. It protects overall ideas of people from being stolen. But then when you get into the nitty gritty, it gets rather shady. Why should we have to site a source if we write a paper or an article about something just because it may seem like a complicated fact? Is there not the rule of common knowledge? Why should we have to cite every fact that is put in a written work? It takes away from our own ability to learn by making us give credit to somone else and making it seem as though we could not know this fact on our own.

]]> http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/09/06/the-three-kinds-of-plagiarism-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-722 PlagiarismToday » Punditry: Turn This In Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:32:19 +0000 http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?p=89#comment-722 [...] On the other hand, Turnitin does offer the extra benefit of protecting the sites in its database against plagiarism. Theoretically, any site held within the Turnitin database can not be plagiarized by anyone at any institution using the service.  However, academic plagiarists, the area Turnitin specializes in, have the least amount of economic impact on its victims of any kind of plagiarists. On the other hand, as Turnitin makes its way into the journalism arena, that may change. [...] [...] On the other hand, Turnitin does offer the extra benefit of protecting the sites in its database against plagiarism. Theoretically, any site held within the Turnitin database can not be plagiarized by anyone at any institution using the service.  However, academic plagiarists, the area Turnitin specializes in, have the least amount of economic impact on its victims of any kind of plagiarists. On the other hand, as Turnitin makes its way into the journalism arena, that may change. [...]

]]>